new perl / perl-after-upgrade

2010-09-16 Thread Christer Solskogen
After upgrading perl to 5.12.2_1 running perl-after-upgrade showed that no files will be moved. And that is a little wierd when there are a lot of files left in /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.1. Is that script working as expected? -- chs, ___

autoconf-2.62 -- 2.67 upgrade has broken build of postgresql-server-8.4.x

2010-09-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
Postgresql configure seems to be picky about exactly what version of autoconf it works with: === Returning to dependency check for databases/postgresql84-server === Dependency check complete for databases/postgresql84-server === Cleaning for postgresql-server-8.4.4_3 === BACKUP

Re: autoconf-2.62 -- 2.67 upgrade has broken build of postgresql-server-8.4.x

2010-09-16 Thread Christer Solskogen
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: Postgresql configure seems to be picky about exactly what version of autoconf it works with: I did not encounter that one. My postgresql-server-84 builds fine. -- chs,

devel/autotools267 install error

2010-09-16 Thread andrew clarke
Hi, $ uname -a FreeBSD blizzard.phoenix 7.3-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p2 #0: Mon Jul 12 19:04:04 UTC 2010 r...@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 $ pwd /usr/ports/devel/autoconf267 $ make reinstall : install -o root -g wheel -m 444 ./autoconf-2.67.info

Re: [ports/net/isc-dhcp*] Don't stop DHCP related daemons

2010-09-16 Thread Greg Byshenk
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:31:51AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 9/15/2010 1:18 AM, Greg Byshenk wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 06:22:24PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: I can think of at least one more scenario off the top of my head. You want to run the new version of the service the next time

Re: autoconf267 perl module loading problems

2010-09-16 Thread Paul Macdonald
On 16/09/2010 11:01, Paul Macdonald wrote: i suspect this is due to the autoconf upgrade.. I'm in the process of downgrading autoconf, unless anyone has a better idea? /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd start Starting spamd. Can't locate NetAddr/IP.pm in @INC (@INC contains:

Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-gd-5.3.3_2

2010-09-16 Thread Alex Dupre
Nicholas E. Solon | CTO ha scritto: I am writing to request a change to the php5-gd port. This port requires that the gd extension include xpm support, which relies on a long dependency chain of x11 libraries. Since many PHP users run production web servers, myself included, it is not

Re: devel/autotools267 and UPDATING

2010-09-16 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 16.09.2010 01:30, schrieb Barbara: I've just run portupgrade -ap, after getting the new autotools and reading UPDATING. From what I can understand, as it's not a version bump but a new port (I realized it too late...). So maybe I should have used something like: # portupgrade -o

Re: www/openx vuln

2010-09-16 Thread Dan Langille
On Thu, September 16, 2010 1:09 am, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: 16.09.2010 05:45, Dan Langille пишет: This came in last night: http://blog.openx.org/09/security-update/ Port needs to be upgraded to 2.8.8 and a vuln entry created Sorry, bags not me. Until update is not come up,

Re: devel/autotools267 and UPDATING

2010-09-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 16/09/2010 11:43:04, Matthias Andree wrote: Am 16.09.2010 01:30, schrieb Barbara: I've just run portupgrade -ap, after getting the new autotools and reading UPDATING. From what I can understand, as it's not a version bump but a new port (I realized it too late...). So maybe I should

Re: www/openx vuln

2010-09-16 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
16.09.2010 17:59, Dan Langille пишет: On Thu, September 16, 2010 1:09 am, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: 16.09.2010 05:45, Dan Langille пишет: This came in last night: http://blog.openx.org/09/security-update/ Port needs to be upgraded to 2.8.8 and a vuln entry created Sorry, bags not

Re: www/openx vuln

2010-09-16 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
16.09.2010 19:19, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет: 16.09.2010 17:59, Dan Langille пишет: On Thu, September 16, 2010 1:09 am, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: 16.09.2010 05:45, Dan Langille пишет: This came in last night: http://blog.openx.org/09/security-update/ Port needs to be upgraded to 2.8.8

Re: www/openx vuln

2010-09-16 Thread Mike Jakubik
The risk is real, my own server was compromised yesterday. http://news.softpedia.com/news/Unpatched-OpenX-Vulnerability-Exploited-to-Compromise-Multiple-Ad-Servers-156402.shtml I am in the process of creating an updated port, should file a pr soon, but it should be marked as forbidden until

Re: [legal] port with restrictive license

2010-09-16 Thread Marcin Cieslak
Dnia 11.09.2010 Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru napisał/a: software authors kindly agreed to remove revocation term (which worried be the most), however other terms are in question. Could someone review that license and say whether that's ok in ports, whether distfile mirroring is OK and

Re: new perl / perl-after-upgrade

2010-09-16 Thread Sergey Skvortsov
On 16.09.2010 10:20, Christer Solskogen wrote: After upgrading perl to 5.12.2_1 running perl-after-upgrade showed that no files will be moved. And that is a little wierd when there are a lot of files left in /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.1. Is that script working as expected? Fixed, thanks for

Re: autoconf update

2010-09-16 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Dominic Fandrey (kamik...@bsdforen.de) wrote: Just out of curiosity, why a version bump because of a build dependency? I don't think an autoconf update should have an effect on any /running/ software but build systems. And I don't see how rebuilding all the software improves it. This

Re: Option in port depending on another port, how to handle ?

2010-09-16 Thread Eric Masson
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes: Hello, Why not extract it as a dependency then? .if defined(WITH_HTTP_UWSGI_MODULE) CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --add-module=${UWSGI_WRKSRC}/nginx BUILD_DEPENDS+= ${NONEXISTENT}:${PORTSDIR}/www/uwsgi:patch UWSGI_WRKSRC!= ${MAKE} -V WRKSRC -C

Re: [legal] port with restrictive license

2010-09-16 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Marcin Cieslak (sa...@saper.info) wrote: software authors kindly agreed to remove revocation term (which worried be the most), however other terms are in question. Could someone review that license and say whether that's ok in ports, whether distfile mirroring is OK and whether we

Tomcat6 port keeps locking up??

2010-09-16 Thread Kaya Saman
Hi, I'm running Tomcat6 in a jail which I'm using to host the Xwiki application. This is the version of Tomcat I'm running: tomcat-6.0.29 Open-source Java web server by Apache, 6.x branch Now after a while the wiki will just stop working and the CPU will spin up to 100%?? The

Re: autoconf update

2010-09-16 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 16/09/2010 19:17, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: * Dominic Fandrey (kamik...@bsdforen.de) wrote: Just out of curiosity, why a version bump because of a build dependency? I don't think an autoconf update should have an effect on any /running/ software but build systems. And I don't see how

Re: [legal] port with restrictive license

2010-09-16 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi-- On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: The only thing left that worries me is that US export laws stuff - I absolutely don't understand what that means and how we can/cannot violate these by mirroring distfiles/packages. For now I've removed all mirroring permissions from

autoconf-2.62 -- 2.67 upgrade has broken build of postgresql-server-8.4.x

2010-09-16 Thread Barbara
Christer Solskogen wrote On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Matthew Seaman Postgresql configure seems to be picky about exactly what version of autoconf it works with: I did not encounter that one. My postgresql-server-84 builds fine. I did. I guess that you are NOT building it WITH_ICU or