FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

2010-10-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2010-10-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2010-10-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on

FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2010-10-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

2010-10-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as forbidden in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port,

INDEX build failed for 6.x

2010-10-21 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..cannot open /local0/portmgr/tindex/ports/multimedia/pvr250/work/pkg-descr: No such file or directory === multimedia/pvr250 failed *** Error code 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /local0/portmgr/tindex/ports. *** Error code 1 Stop in

Re: INDEX build failed for 6.x

2010-10-21 Thread Edwin Groothuis
Oops... Fixing now. -- Edwin Groothuis Website: http://www.mavetju.org/ ed...@mavetju.org Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

Re: Problem (again) with portsnap5.FreeBSD.org?

2010-10-21 Thread Guido Falsi
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 01:02:47PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 09:53:24PM +0200, Barbara wrote: On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:11:35 +0200 (CEST) Barbara barbara.xxx1975 at libero.it articulated: $ date Wed Oct 20 01:11:10 CEST 2010 # portsnap fetch update

INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x

2010-10-21 Thread Erwin Lansing
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: Problem (again) with portsnap5.FreeBSD.org?

2010-10-21 Thread RW
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:31:24 +0200 Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net wrote: I have noticed on the machines I use/administer a bias towards portsnap5. I mean, all these machines are always choosing mirror number five. Some are behind squid proxies and using them for portsnap, so I think this

Re: FreeBSD Port: zabbix-server-1.8.3,2

2010-10-21 Thread Jim Riggs
On Oct 21, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Переклад Алексей wrote: I have multiple problems with net-mgmt/zabbix-server port on FreeBSD 8.1. First of all, it requires the netlibsnmp library version 1.6 while FreeBSD 8.1 uses version 2.0. I repaired that by creating symlink “libnetsnmp.so.16” to

Re: Problem (again) with portsnap5.FreeBSD.org?

2010-10-21 Thread Royce Williams
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:51 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:31:24 +0200 Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net wrote: I have noticed on the machines I use/administer a bias towards portsnap5. If you define a cache environment variable the random choice is seeded by

Re: Problem (again) with portsnap5.FreeBSD.org?

2010-10-21 Thread Guido Falsi
On 10/21/10 18:17, Royce Williams wrote: On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:51 AM, RWrwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:31:24 +0200 Guido Falsim...@madpilot.net wrote: I have noticed on the machines I use/administer a bias towards portsnap5. If you define a cache environment

GIMP 2.4 - better ui usability

2010-10-21 Thread Tomek CEDRO
I am really sick of idiotic GIMP 2.6 interface changes that destroys my multi workspace work habits learned for over 10 years (mainly related with menu available in toolbar). They want it to become more photoshop alike. Maybe someone has similar feeling, so I thought maybe its not that bad idea to

Re: Correction of the Ports documentation

2010-10-21 Thread Sahil Tandon
[replying on-list for posterity] On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 10:51:28 +0200, Carsten Jensen wrote: I followed the ports guide on freebsd.org perhaps you could get someone to fix the documentation there if my package is wrong.