On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Mark Terribile wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry to bother everyone here, but either I'm a cretin or the ports
> management commands are ... non-obvious. Or worse.
>
> Here's what I need: a working, installable version of openoffice.org .
> The ports system on my FreeB
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Mon 22 Nov 2010 at 11:28:36 PST Greg Byshenk wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm not a porter, but how about the below...?
>> HTH
>> -greg
>>
>> --- begin diff ---
>>
>> --- porting-submitting.html 2007-09-11 01:11:07.0 +0200
>> +++ porting-s
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I put together this patch. I hope this is sufficient.
Thanks!
Jason
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 07:58:56PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen thus spake:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:19 PM, RW wrote:
Actually it does discuss the wording of the synopsis for both new and
updated ports which gives the imp
On 11/23/10 02:14, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 22:20, O. Hartmann
wrote:
On 11/22/10 19:20, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 19:28, O. Hartmann
wrote:
On 11/19/10 18:11, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
2010/11/19 O. Hartmann:
On 11/19/10 13:46, Koop Ma
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 22:20, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> On 11/22/10 19:20, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 19:28, O. Hartmann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/19/10 18:11, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
2010/11/19 O. Hartmann:
>
> On 11/19/10 13:46, Koop Mast wrote:
>>
Hi,
I'm sorry to bother everyone here, but either I'm a cretin or the ports
management commands are ... non-obvious. Or worse.
Here's what I need: a working, installable version of openoffice.org .
The ports system on my FreeBSD 7.1 (which I need to keep stable for a few
months) has only been w
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: asterisk-stat-2.0.1_8: no entry for /usr/ports/net/asterisk-addons
Committers on the hook:
bapt beat beech ehaupt fjoe jadawin kuriyama kwm makc mezz mm nivit obrien
ohauer pav skreuzer sunpoe
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 08:20:28PM +0200, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
[snip]
> Seems, like you think that Xerces authors use libNAME-VER.so naming
> scheme, while FreeBSD uses libNAME.so.VER ...
Just as a data point, it's possible (I'm not sure if it's the case with
Xerces, but it *is* the case with
On 22 November 2010 17:17, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 08:21:31PM +0300, Eir Nym wrote:
>> On 19 November 2010 18:32, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>> > Eir Nym wrote:
>> >
>> >> >>> Since when? If you are missing /bin/csh, your system is defective
>> >> >>> or at least nonstandar
On Monday 22 November 2010 13:15:18 RW wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:58:56 +0100
>
> Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:19 PM, RW
> >
> > wrote:
>
> If someone that's never submitted a document patch before, submits one
> that involves moving a chapter in the porter's han
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:58:56 +0100
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:19 PM, RW
> wrote:
>
> > IMO chapter 10 should either be 3.7 or be merged into 3.6. If
> > anything deserves to be under "Quick Porting" it's this.
> >
>
> So then we will see your PR for an update of tha
On Mon 22 Nov 2010 at 11:28:36 PST Greg Byshenk wrote:
I'm not a porter, but how about the below...?
HTH
-greg
--- begin diff ---
--- porting-submitting.html 2007-09-11 01:11:07.0 +0200
+++ porting-submitting.html 2010-11-22 20:14:54.0 +0100
@@ -69,6 +69,14 @@
+
+
+N
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: asterisk-stat-2.0.1_8: no entry for /usr/ports/net/asterisk-addons
Committers on the hook:
bapt beat ehaupt fjoe jadawin kuriyama kwm makc mezz mm nivit obrien skreuzer
sunpoet wen
Most rece
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 05:18:13PM +, David Southwell wrote:
> > > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:17:21 +
> > >
> > > David Southwell wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 12:12:11 +
> > > > >
> > > > > David Southwell wrote:
> > > > > > I posted about this failure some time ago but have h
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 05:18:13PM +, David Southwell wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:17:21 +
> >
> > David Southwell wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 12:12:11 +
> > > >
> > > > David Southwell wrote:
> > > > > I posted about this failure some time ago but have had no useful
> >
On 11/22/10 19:20, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 19:28, O. Hartmann
wrote:
On 11/19/10 18:11, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
2010/11/19 O. Hartmann:
On 11/19/10 13:46, Koop Mast wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:32:33 +0100
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
Hello.
Trying to do my firs
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 07:58:56PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:19 PM, RW wrote:
> >
> > Actually it does discuss the wording of the synopsis for both new and
> > updated ports which gives the impression that that that section covers
> > both.
> >
> > Furthermore th
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:19 PM, RW wrote:
>
> Actually it does discuss the wording of the synopsis for both new and
> updated ports which gives the impression that that that section covers
> both.
>
> Furthermore the update chapter is at the opposite end of the
> index under the single mis
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: asterisk-stat-2.0.1_8: no entry for /usr/ports/net/asterisk-addons
Committers on the hook:
bapt fjoe jadawin kuriyama kwm mezz mm nivit obrien sunpoet wen
Most recent CVS update was:
U devel/
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 09:26:49PM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote:
> E.g., why not send an email requesting resubmission in the proper
> format?
A lot of committers do try to do just that. There is no automated
process, however.
> Many of the of oldest unassigned but still-open PR's show no evidenc
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 19:28, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> On 11/19/10 18:11, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
>>
>> 2010/11/19 O. Hartmann:
>>>
>>> On 11/19/10 13:46, Koop Mast wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:32:33 +0100
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
> Hello.
> Trying to do my first port and
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:19:05 +
RW wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:22:57 -0800
> Charlie Kester wrote:
>
> > On Sun 21 Nov 2010 at 22:01:28 PST Janky Jay, III wrote:
> > >
> > >Almost anyone who is an only semi-serious port maintainer
> > > (meaning
> > >they only have a select few numbe
Charlie Kester wrote:
> I'm working on a new port that installs a program with a name that seems
> like it would already be taken, but I don't have anything by that name
> on my system -- even though I have lots of ports installed.
>
> I know that I can use "portsdb -r" to find all the ports that
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: asterisk-stat-2.0.1_8: no entry for /usr/ports/net/asterisk-addons
Committers on the hook:
bapt fjoe jadawin kuriyama mezz mm obrien wen
Most recent CVS update was:
U audio/mpdas/Makefile
U a
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 05:35:20PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Any ideas? I've tried the suggestions at
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/compiz-fusion/index.html and
> they don't work for me.
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Suggestions on getting compiz working?
> Date: W
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 08:21:31PM +0300, Eir Nym wrote:
> On 19 November 2010 18:32, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > Eir Nym wrote:
> >
> >> >>> Since when? If you are missing /bin/csh, your system is defective
> >> >>> or at least nonstandard.
> >> >>
> >> >> It is good joke, thanks
> >> >
> >>
On 11/19/10 18:11, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
2010/11/19 O. Hartmann:
On 11/19/10 13:46, Koop Mast wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:32:33 +0100
"O. Hartmann"wrote:
Hello.
Trying to do my first port and run into trouble.
The software package (Xerces-c 3.1.1) comes with a full autotoll
environm
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:22:57 -0800
Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Sun 21 Nov 2010 at 22:01:28 PST Janky Jay, III wrote:
> >
> >Almost anyone who is an only semi-serious port maintainer
> > (meaning
> >they only have a select few number of ports to maintain and are only
> >trying to contribute/par
On Sunday 21 November 2010 20:26:49 Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Sun 21 Nov 2010 at 20:09:23 PST Beech Rintoul wrote:
> >That is correct, although it is possible to use a unified diff with the
> >"-N" flag against a non existent source. The problem is too many
> >contributors send in update pr's in s
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsol
31 matches
Mail list logo