Before opening an Problem Reports, I thought I'd run what I'd like to do
by the FreeBSD ports mailing list.
The following five ports need to be deleted:
lang/gnat-doc-html
lang/gnat-doc-info
lang/gnat-doc-ps
lang/gnat-doc-texi
lang/gnat-doc-tex
Reason: These provide documentation for GNAT
Better to send PRs to add or remove these ports. I am intersting to take.
wen
2011/1/4 John Marino freebs...@marino.st:
Before opening an Problem Reports, I thought I'd run what I'd like to do by
the FreeBSD ports mailing list.
The following five ports need to be deleted:
lang/gnat-doc-html
What installs libjawt?
eclipse-3.6.1_1:
/usr/local/lib/eclipse/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/149/1/.cp/libswt-
awt-gtk-3655.so misses libjawt.so
openoffice.org-3.2.1:
/usr/local/openoffice.org-3.2.1/openoffice.org/basis3.2/program/libofficebean.so
misses libjawt.so
David
Hello!
04.01.2011, 23:01, David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net:
What installs libjawt?
eclipse-3.6.1_1:
/usr/local/lib/eclipse/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/149/1/.cp/libswt-
awt-gtk-3655.so misses libjawt.so
openoffice.org-3.2.1:
David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net writes:
Hi,
What installs libjawt?
Any jre installed ?
e...@srvbsdfenssv:~ locate libjawt.so
/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libjawt.so
Regards
Éric Masson
--
Il veut que frjv disparaisse afin que les contacts entre pirates
et public soit
Hi
pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:
diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo-
jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so
Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ?
When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes
Hi!
pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:
diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo-
jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so
Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ?
Yes.
When attempting to install databases/libodbc++
On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote:
Hi
pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:
diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo-
jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so
Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ?
When
Hello!
05.01.2011, 01:00, J. Hellenthal jh...@dataix.net:
On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote:
Hi
pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:
diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo-
jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so
Is it right
Thanks Wen,
I submitted PR 153676 to delete the old gnat doc ports.
Regarding the seven new ports, should I write one PR to cover all seven,
or seven individual PRs? Some are dependencies of others, so it kind of
makes sense to submit them together.
John
wen heping wrote:
Better to send
On 1/4/11, jmdennis @dslextreme.com jmden...@dslextreme.com wrote:
Thanks for pointing out my duh moment. I did not think about having to
edit
any thing but it makes sense since you had mentioned that it should be
DS_ATTACHED. I guess who ever build the PBI for PC-BSD needs to do this as
Hello!
05.01.2011, 01:00, J. Hellenthal jh...@dataix.net:
On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote:
Hi
pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:
diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo-
jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so
[ Suggest not to cc: freebsd-stable@ from this point on; freebsd-ports@
is added ]
,--- You/ben (Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:16:26 +) *
| I've followed the steps at
| http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/desktop-browsers.html without any
| errors, except that neither Firefox nor any other
Hi!
Dima Panov write:
jh...@dataix.net wrote:
Replace libiodbc with unixODBC
They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC.
Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features,
exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso.
Ah, interesting. What's the
divHello!/divdivnbsp;/divdivdiablo-jdk is very outdated binary,
build almost ~1 year old portstree on a tinderbox with preinstalled
environment./divdivplease, don't rely on it in real
environment./divdivnbsp;/divdivcorrect solution is switch to builded
natively package (jdk16 or openjdk6),
Hello!
05.01.2011, 02:27, Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu:
Hi!
Dima Panov write:
jh...@dataix.net wrote:
Replace libiodbc with unixODBC
They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC.
Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features,
exist in libiodbc and
Can people please stick to plain text.
This is really quite unreadable
Thanks
Hello!
diablo-jdk is very outdated binary, build almost ~1 year old portstree on a
tinderbox with preinstalled environment.
please, don't rely on it in real environment.
correct solution is switch to builded
Quoth David Southwell on Tuesday, 04 January 2011:
Can people please stick to plain text.
This is really quite unreadable
Thanks
Agreed.
At least mark HTML content as type text/html instead of
text/plain.
--
Sterling (Chip) Camden| sterl...@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F
Hi,
rkhunter 1.3.8 from ports complains about the /etc/passwd file. Why
does it do that?
From /var/log/rkhunter.log:
[03:01:30] /etc/passwd [ Warning ]
[03:01:30] Warning: The file '/etc/passwd' exists on the system, but
it is not present in the rkhunter.dat
Hello!
diablo-jdk is very outdated binary, build almost ~1 year old portstree on a
tinderbox with preinstalled environment.
please, don't rely on it in real environment.
correct solution is switch to builded natively package (jdk16 or openjdk6),
which always will use correct system libraries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/27/2010 02:55 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade roundcube, and pecl-intl isn't building.
Removing the IGNORE shows a number of linker errors. I found PR#153438
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153438 suggesting that
On Jan 4, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
rkhunter 1.3.8 from ports complains about the /etc/passwd file. Why does it
do that?
It's buggy?
RKHunter is better known for generating vast numbers of obscure false positives
than it is for actually providing a security benefit.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Do you know if there would be any issues with MySQL 5.0.91 running on
FreeBSD?
Tom
- --
TJU13-ARIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:14:12AM -0500, Alex Goncharov wrote:
I play Flash in Firefox, (native) Opera and Chrome -- perfectly now.
For Firefox, the instructions in the Handbook worked for me.
I followed the handbook process only yesterday and i'm not experiencing any
problems with
On Jan 4, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
Do you know if there would be any issues with MySQL 5.0.91 running on FreeBSD?
There shouldn't be. I think ports is still at mysql-server-5.0.90_2, which
works fine, but I would expect that 5.0.91 would also be fine
Regards,
--
-Chuck
On 01/04/2011 01:03 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jan 4, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
Do you know if there would be any issues with MySQL 5.0.91 running on
FreeBSD?
There shouldn't be. I think ports is still at mysql-server-5.0.90_2, which
works fine, but I would expect that 5.0.91
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 22:49:32 +0100, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
Hi,
I don't know, if anyone follows development of Xfce 4.8, the next
stable version comes out soon, scheduled on January 16th, 2011. There
are still « things », that do not work well or are broken, in
particular Thunar (thunar-volman
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On Jan 4, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
rkhunter 1.3.8 from ports complains about the /etc/passwd file. Why does it
do that?
It's buggy?
RKHunter is better known for generating vast numbers of obscure
2011/1/4 John Marino freebs...@marino.st:
Thanks Wen,
I submitted PR 153676 to delete the old gnat doc ports.
Regarding the seven new ports, should I write one PR to cover all seven, or
seven individual PRs? Some are dependencies of others, so it kind of makes
Both OK.
wen
sense to submit
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:14:12AM -0500, Alex Goncharov wrote:
I play Flash in Firefox, (native) Opera and Chrome -- perfectly now.
For Firefox, the instructions in the Handbook worked for me.
I followed the handbook process only yesterday
Allow me to suggest flashblock.mozdev.org. Works fine as an add-on, but
here's also a port in www/xpi-flashblock.
I'll give it a go, thanks :-)
jamie
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
31 matches
Mail list logo