Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote: On 03/06/2011 17:59, Warren Block wrote: pkg_version is somewhat faster. True, but 'portmaster -L' (with a ports tree) gives you more information. Such as when ports you have installed have been DEPRECATED or MOVED. :) 'portmaster -L --index-only' is

Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

On 03/06/2011 17:59, Warren Block wrote: On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote: On 03/06/2011 16:40, Olivier Smedts wrote: Could you use "pkg_version -vL =" for your purpose ? It's a base system tool and doesn't need INDEX. If all you want to know is what ports need updating, portmaster has

Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote: On 03/06/2011 16:40, Olivier Smedts wrote: Could you use "pkg_version -vL =" for your purpose ? It's a base system tool and doesn't need INDEX. If all you want to know is what ports need updating, portmaster has an option for that. There is also an ali

Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

On 03/06/2011 16:40, Olivier Smedts wrote: Could you use "pkg_version -vL =" for your purpose ? It's a base system tool and doesn't need INDEX. If all you want to know is what ports need updating, portmaster has an option for that. There is also an alias to abbreviate the output in the man p

Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

2011/3/6 Grzegorz Blach : > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 23:25, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 03/06/2011 10:37, Grzegorz Blach wrote: >>> >>> On 03/06/2011 18:35, b. f. wrote: > > I read last post Martin Wilke's blog called "FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!" > > First of all, I think it's difficult

Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 23:25, Doug Barton wrote: > On 03/06/2011 10:37, Grzegorz Blach wrote: >> >> On 03/06/2011 18:35, b. f. wrote: I read last post Martin Wilke's blog called "FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!" First of all, I think it's difficult to testing ports > > No argument t

Re: [FYI] Fwd: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.python.mk

Heino Tiedemann wrote: >> >>> Does it rebuild all depending packages? > >> > >>And waht is the difference between make upgrade-site-packages and > >>portupgrade -r python? ... > can you tell me if libreoffice is in the list to recompile? I don't know, I don't have it on my machine. If you do, the

Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

On 03/06/2011 10:37, Grzegorz Blach wrote: On 03/06/2011 18:35, b. f. wrote: I read last post Martin Wilke's blog called "FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!" First of all, I think it's difficult to testing ports No argument there, it can be hard work. I'm using testing release of VirtualBox, but fo

Re: Is it possible to install only some parts of libreoffice?

Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 03.03.2011, 03:27, "Charlie Kester" : >> On Wed 02 Mar 2011 at 15:06:52 PST Charlie Kester wrote: >> >>> I don't want or need all of the programs in the libreoffice suite. >>> >>> In fact, the only reason I might install it is to get the presentation >>> program so I c

xfce 4.8 upgrade errors

How do I create a app menu, I'm getting an error when trying to load the menu "menus/applications.menu" not found. Recompile sysutils/garcon to resolve this error. I hope this helps someone else... Regards, Mark ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mai

Re: Firefox 4 - Beta

Sergey Nikolenko wrote: > On 06.03.2011 19:17, Heino Tiedemann wrote: >> Any manpage or howto how I can gat this on my computer? Do I need SVN >> for that > > 1. cd /usr/ports/devel/subversion; make install clean > 2. cd /usr/ports/www > 3. svn co > https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gec

Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

On 3/6/11, Grzegorz Blach wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/06/2011 18:35, b. f. wrote: ... >>> First of all, I think it's difficult to testing ports. ... > Multiple trees don't help me a lot, portmaster became fools. > There is no significant difference if I use v

Re: curses update

On 06/03/2011 21:17, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > It seems a lot of dependant packages need to be rebuilt: > > This is my personal rebuild list: > > # pkg_libchk -q > aalib-1.4.r5_5 > aspell-0.60.6_5 > eclipse-3.6.1_1 > Sorry about getting eclipse in there. It showed up because it's linked against

curses update

It seems a lot of dependant packages need to be rebuilt: # pkg_libchk aalib-1.4.r5_5: /usr/local/bin/aafire misses libncurses.so.5.7 aalib-1.4.r5_5: /usr/local/bin/aafire misses libncurses.so.5.7 aalib-1.4.r5_5: /usr/local/bin/aainfo misses libncurses.so.5.7 aalib-1.4.r5_5: /usr/local/bin/aainfo m

Re: FreeBSD Port: py27-feedparser-4.1_2

06.03.2011 16:52, Douglas Thrift пишет: Hello, It looks like there have been several new releases of the Universal Feed Parser in the past few months. Are there any plans to update the port to the latest version? Thanks! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/155322 -- Regards, Rus

Re: FreeBSD Port: sabnzbdplus-0.5.6_2 Installs Cherrypy-3.2

Hi Huib, Noticed that my sabnzbd failed after upgrading cherrypy 3.1.2 to 3.2 from ports. Hadn't seen the knob for the version check, mine started failing on the Cheetah check was my impression. In general sabnzbd comes with its own cherrypy version included, the FreeBSD version uses cherrypy fro

Re: KDE3?

On Wednesday 02 March 2011 17:26:20 Heino Tiedemann wrote: > is KDE3 "out"? > > > - misc/kdeutils3 (marked as IGNORE) > > or will it be compilable soon? it is fixed now -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla Waste not, get your budget cut next year. s

FreeBSD Port: sabnzbdplus-0.5.6_2 Installs Cherrypy-3.2

Hi Daniel, thanks for mainting the SABnzbdplus port. Just did a clean install of the port on a clean install of FreeBSD 8.2 (amd64) and run into the following: The port installs cherrypy version 3.2 but when I start the SABnzbd.py it says it wants Cherrypy version 3.1 I went into the SABnzbd.

Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/2011 18:35, b. f. wrote: >> I read last post Martin Wilke's blog called "FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!" >> >> First of all, I think it's difficult to testing ports. >> >> I'm using testing release of VirtualBox, >> but for build this port I must

Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

On Sunday 06 March 2011 18:35:10 b. f. wrote: > It sounds like you are using the wrong tools. Although portsnap (which > is not best suited for this purpose) has path arguments and an -l flag > that can be used to add or preserve local changes, and both portmaster > and portupgrade have options to

Re: Firefox 4 - Beta

On 06.03.2011 19:17, Heino Tiedemann wrote: is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports? maybe into www/firefox-devel? Firefox 4 is in the State "beta 12" - what means it is the release candidate. Firefox 4 is available for FreeBSD for a long time in our development reposito

Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

On 3/6/11, b. f. wrote: ... >> First of all, I think it's difficult to testing ports. ... >> Another possibility is replace ports in disk, but after upgrade tree eg. >> with portsnap I lose my changes, and portmaster want to rebuild these >> ports to stable release. ... > It sounds like you are us

Re: net-p2p/transmission-gtk2 fails to build

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > 05.03.2011 17:29, Anonymous пишет: >> >> Ruslan Mahmatkhanov  writes: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I'm trying to update transmission 2.13 ->  2.22 on 8-stable. >>> >>> Errors like this: >>> ../libtransmission/libtransmission.a(handshake.o)(.text+

Re: FreeBSD Port: transmission-2.22

On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Grzegorz Blach wrote: > On 03/06/2011 12:55, David Demelier wrote: >> On 06/03/2011 07:21, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >>> 06.03.2011 05:18, Alex V. Petrov пишет: FreeBSD alex.super 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #116: Thu Mar 3 21:55:50 KRAT 2011 alex@

Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

> I read last post Martin Wilke's blog called "FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!" > > First of all, I think it's difficult to testing ports. > > I'm using testing release of VirtualBox, > but for build this port I must download patches, > apply its on my own tree and merge its with official ports > using

Re: xfce4.8 icons/menus/panel

Install misc/gnome-icon-theme - go into Appearance (Icons tab), choose GNOME if you prefer Tango (like me), re-click on Tango, and keyboard icon will appear. 2011/3/6 David DEMELIER : > For me everything works well but I still do not have the Keyboard > icons (was already the same in 4.6) > > As

Re: xfce4.8 icons/menus/panel

For me everything works well but I still do not have the Keyboard icons (was already the same in 4.6) As you can see here : http://files.malikania.fr/settings.png It appears with every icons themes I try. Cheers, -- Demelier David ___ freebsd-ports@f

Re: Thunar startup

2011/3/5 Warren Block : > The last issue with the new xfce 4.8 is Thunar.  From the command line: > >  % thunar > >  (thunar:71482): GVFS-RemoteVolumeMonitor-WARNING **: invoking IsSupported() > failed for remote volume monitor with dbus name > org.gtk.Private.GPhoto2VolumeMonitor: > org.freedeskto

Re: Firefox 4 - Beta

Beat Gaetzi wrote: > On 05.03.2011 12:48, Heino Tiedemann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports? >> >> maybe into www/firefox-devel? >> >> >> Firefox 4 is in the State "beta 12" - what means it is the release >> candidate. > > Firefox 4 is available

Re: Adding a PAM config option to net-im/ejabberd

Lawrence Stewart writes: > On 01/31/11 13:09, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: >> Lawrence Stewart writes: >>> On 01/31/11 00:45, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: Hi Lawrence, Lawrence Stewart writes: > Hi Ashish, > What do you think about applying the attached patch to the ejabberd > por

FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

I read last post Martin Wilke's blog called "FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!" First of all, I think it's difficult to testing ports. I'm using testing release of VirtualBox, but for build this port I must download patches, apply its on my own tree and merge its with official ports using portshaker. I

FreeBSD Port: py27-feedparser-4.1_2

Hello, It looks like there have been several new releases of the Universal Feed Parser in the past few months. Are there any plans to update the port to the latest version? Thanks! -- Douglas William Thrift ___ freebsd-port

FreeBSD Port: transmission-2.22

> Because, probably it's not a good solution. > I'm useing memcached witch need libevent to work. > So removing libevent, will broke memcached :-( Either wait for a fix or remove libevent+deps->install libevent2+transmission- >install libevent+deps >From the gnome ml: http://lists.freebsd.org/pip

Re: FreeBSD Port: transmission-2.22

On 03/06/2011 12:55, David Demelier wrote: > On 06/03/2011 07:21, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >> 06.03.2011 05:18, Alex V. Petrov пишет: >>> FreeBSD alex.super 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #116: Thu Mar 3 >>> 21:55:50 >>> KRAT 2011 alex@alex.super:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ALEX amd64 >>> >>> transmissio

Re: [FYI] Fwd: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.python.mk

On 06/03/2011 05:47, b. f. wrote: On 3/5/11, b. f. wrote: Does it rebuild all depending packages? And waht is the difference between make upgrade-site-packages and portupgrade -r python? As I explained earlier on freebsd-python@, unlike 'portupgrade -r python', the upgrade-site-packages tar

Re: FreeBSD Port: transmission-2.22

On 06/03/2011 07:21, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: 06.03.2011 05:18, Alex V. Petrov пишет: FreeBSD alex.super 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #116: Thu Mar 3 21:55:50 KRAT 2011 alex@alex.super:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ALEX amd64 transmission-2.13< needs updating (port has 2.22) transmission-cli-2.13< ne

Re: [FYI] Fwd: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.python.mk

On 3/6/11, Rainer Hurling wrote: > On 06.03.2011 09:09 (UTC+1), b. f. wrote: >> On 3/6/11, Rainer Hurling wrote: >>> On 06.03.2011 00:56 (UTC+1), b. f. wrote: > > Now it is more clear to me that this upgrading process depends from the > specific installation. Perhaps it should be mentioned in po

Re: [FYI] Fwd: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.python.mk

"b. f." wrote: >>> Does it rebuild all depending packages? >> >>And waht is the difference between make upgrade-site-packages and >>portupgrade -r python? > > As I explained earlier on freebsd-python@, unlike 'portupgrade -r > python', the upgrade-site-packages target just rebuilds ports that > h

Re: [FYI] Fwd: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.python.mk

On 06.03.2011 09:09 (UTC+1), b. f. wrote: On 3/6/11, Rainer Hurling wrote: On 06.03.2011 00:56 (UTC+1), b. f. wrote: Does it rebuild all depending packages? And waht is the difference between make upgrade-site-packages and portupgrade -r python? As I explained earlier on freebsd-python@, u

Re: [FYI] Fwd: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.python.mk

On 3/6/11, Rainer Hurling wrote: > On 06.03.2011 00:56 (UTC+1), b. f. wrote: Does it rebuild all depending packages? >>> >>> And waht is the difference between make upgrade-site-packages and >>> portupgrade -r python? >> >> As I explained earlier on freebsd-python@, unlike 'portupgrade -r >>