On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi folks,
After a few more -exp runs, we're down to exactly one piece of collateral
damage in terms of migrating from GNU make 3.81-3.82
It's a doozy.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:03:58AM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi folks,
After a few more -exp runs, we're down to exactly one piece of collateral
damage in terms of migrating from GNU make 3.81-3.82
It's a doozy.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:03:58AM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote:
What port is it? Sorry, I can't determine from the previous message...
ports/lang/io, Small prototype-based programming language
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On 2011-Apr-11 11:45:06 +0200, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa g...@atmarama.net wrote:
I'm also interested to see this port updated since gdc is advancing
rapidly and there is no dm2 port available for x86_64 architecture
which leaves 64bit users out of luck. :-(
There's no maintainer for lang/gdc so it's
Hi Doug,
Not that this is much a improvement but thought youd like to be informed
of it. I usually try to refrain whenever possible from calling utilities
like nice(1) or renice(1) and let processes inherit their niceness be
inherited from the parent process. This patch does that very thing for
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:46:01 +1000
Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote:
There's no maintainer for lang/gdc so it's unlikely it will get
updated unless someone with an interest in it (eg you) steps up and
submits an update.
Thank you for reply.
At the moment I still have to do some
Hi,
I'm disappointed that there are plans to remove the ports framework. I
always considered this to be one of the very strong points of the ports
infra structure, precisely because I believe...
Not only that but because maintainers would be
able to choose the best possible configuration for
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh
sunp...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:03:58AM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi folks,
After a few more -exp runs, we're down to exactly one piece of
Hello!
Where is search Wonder-4.0.0.475-Frameworks-53.tar.gz ?
Thank you.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
12.04.2011 19:46, Gennady Bushuev пишет:
Hello!
Where is search Wonder-4.0.0.475-Frameworks-53.tar.gz ?
afaik Wonder Project not in ports tree atm.
You can port it yourself or install it manually.
As for manual install, all the wonder releases is here:
On 4/12/2011 1:39 AM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
Hi Doug,
Not that this is much a improvement but thought youd like to be informed
of it. I usually try to refrain whenever possible from calling utilities
like nice(1) or renice(1) and let processes inherit their niceness be
inherited from the parent
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: neotcl-8.2.2_4: no entry for /usr/ports/databases/db2
make_index: neotcl-8.2.2_4: no entry for /usr/ports/databases/db2
Committers on the hook:
mandree mezz
Most recent CVS update was:
U
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:43:34AM +, Erwin Lansing wrote:
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: neotcl-8.2.2_4: no entry for /usr/ports/databases/db2
make_index: neotcl-8.2.2_4: no entry for /usr/ports/databases/db2
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
14 matches
Mail list logo