[HEADS UP] Ruby 1.9 will become the default Ruby version this weekend

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Barring objections, I'm planning to commit this patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~swills/ruby19_and_gems_changes6.diff tomorrow. It will update Ruby 1.9 and make it the default version. If you wish to continue using Ruby 1.8, set RUBY_VER=

Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer

Chris Rees wrote: > On 18 Aug 2011 08:15, "Matthias Andree" wrote: > > Am 18.08.2011 08:20, schrieb Chris Rees: > > > On 18 August 2011 09:03, wrote: > > >> Chris Rees wrote: > > >> > > >>> We don't want to provide broken software. > > >> > > >> Mark Linimon wrote: > > >> > > >>> ... it's obs

ImageMagick fails to install

This is on 7.x i386. Builds fine, and passes all self-tests. Thanks, Doug ( cd PerlMagick && gmake CC='cc -std=gnu99 -std=gnu99' && \ gmake CC='cc -std=gnu99 -std=gnu99' install ) gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/tmp/usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick-nox11/work/ImageMagick-6.7.0-10/PerlMa

clang vs. schilyware

It looks like a number of pieces of software by Joerg "schily" Schilling fail to build with clang. A little program avoffset is built and run to generate a header file. If compiled with clang, avoffset gets stuck in an infinite loop. sysutils/sdd is affected by this. Presumably, devel/smake and

Re: [patch] mplayer and faad PR still not committed

On 19 August 2011 18:04, David Demelier wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone please take a look at this ?.. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158501 > I'm on it. Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm

[patch] mplayer and faad PR still not committed

Hi, Can someone please take a look at this ?.. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158501 Thanks -- David Demelier ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send an

Ports & Packages infrastructure & feature import.

Hi ports team, cc: Vadim Goncharov Senior/ central ports team people who are competent, happy & authorised to hack in /usr/ports/Mk/* & on pkg tools etc, please notice ports & package infrastructure ideas in thread: From Vadim Goncharov Wed Aug 17 23:25:37 UTC 2011 http://

Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer

On 18 Aug 2011 08:15, "Matthias Andree" wrote: > > Am 18.08.2011 08:20, schrieb Chris Rees: > > On 18 August 2011 09:03, wrote: > >> Chris Rees wrote: > >> > >>> We don't want to provide broken software. > >> > >> Mark Linimon wrote: > >> > >>> ... it's obsolete, broken, junk ... > >> > >> Unl

Extra fields in INDEX

Hi all, I'm having a look at modifying INDEX to have a field at the end (to cause minimum breakage), but I've discovered that in a few ports there (6630 out of 22731) appears to be extra 'stuff' in fields past field 10 (which is for the first WWW: line in pkg-descr). Can anyone with knowledge of

Re: Big patches

On 19 August 2011 11:18, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > >> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 + (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote: >> >> > I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be >> > avoided´at most costs. >> >> > Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocke

Re: Big patches

Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 + (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be > > avoided´at most costs. > > > Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at > > least take 2 days until I

Re: Big patches

Chris Rees wrote: > On 19 August 2011 08:55, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > Mark Linimon wrote: > > > >> Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately. > >> > >> GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches > >> viruses).  Normally I handle such PRs manually befo

Re: Big patches

Hi! On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 + (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote: > I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be > avoided´at most costs. > Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at > least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I sub

Re: Big patches

On 19 August 2011 08:55, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Mark Linimon wrote: > >> Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately. >> >> GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches >> viruses).  Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup >> process runs, but

Re: Big patches

Mark Linimon wrote: > Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately. > > GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches > viruses). Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup > process runs, but I forgot to do it this time. (I only took a > glance.)