Hi *, now I'm testing x11-toolkits/fltk for math/octave port.
sorry for delay.
thanks
From: Pietro Cerutti g...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP --- Update to x11-toolkits/fltk coming
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:53:31 +0200
On 2011-Sep-06, 08:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 09/06/2011
Hi list,
As you may know, games/flightgear-aircrafts is *HUGE*, way too big to be
useable and buildable correctly, and, as a maintainer, a real pain to
update. Today, if you just need one airplane from flightgear-aircrafts,
you would have to download 350+ airplanes and more than 2 GB of data,
On 2011-Sep-22, 16:30, Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi *, now I'm testing x11-toolkits/fltk for math/octave port.
sorry for delay.
I'm a bit behind schedule too, I'll probably get to it only next week!
Happy testing ;)
thanks
From: Pietro Cerutti g...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP --- Update
On 14/09/2011 11:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 14/09/2011 11:37, Matthew Seaman wrote:
This port has dependencies on three perl modules not already ported, so
I've created new ports for those as well. You can download .shar
archives of all four from:
On 22 Sep 2011 09:11, Ganael LAPLANCHE ganael.laplan...@martymac.org
wrote:
Hi list,
As you may know, games/flightgear-aircrafts is *HUGE*, way too big to be
useable and buildable correctly, and, as a maintainer, a real pain to
update. Today, if you just need one airplane from
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:03:38AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
On 22 Sep 2011 09:11, Ganael LAPLANCHE ganael.laplan...@martymac.org
wrote:
Hi list,
As you may know, games/flightgear-aircrafts is *HUGE*, way too big to be
useable and buildable correctly, and, as a maintainer, a real pain
On 22.09.2011 10:32, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 14/09/2011 11:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 14/09/2011 11:37, Matthew Seaman wrote:
This port has dependencies on three perl modules not already ported, so
I've created new ports for those as well. You can download .shar
archives of all four from:
Hi Chris,
I see; these things always might happen.
Can you tell me where I can find a summary of issues that come with this
version? I then can check whether this might affect my system or not.
For the time being I will stick to 1.9.
Thanks,
Jos Chrispijn
Chris Rees:
Unfortunately,
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:07:40 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote
Chris, Anton,
Thanks for your feedback.
4) add-on ports?
yes, this seems to be the case with latex, works fine.
I am not sure to understand what you mean exactly. Could you be more
precise ?
--
Ganael LAPLANCHE
On 22/09/2011 10:20, Florian Smeets wrote:
One question: committers -- would you prefer this as a .shar for a new
www/rt40 port, or as a diff against www/rt38 and repo-copy to www/rt40?
Please send it as a diff against rt38, as we'll do a repo copy.
Done.
Hiya
Im actually trying to install the port terminator, but the dependacy port it
tripping over itself.
Would anyone know how I can go about fixing this?
Kind Regards
Brent Clark
[root@bclark-laptop /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-vte]# make install clean
=== Building for py27-vte-0.26.2
CC
From Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org:
Well... you lose avahi, which is a zeroconf implementation, but you're
probably just better off with samba.
The BROKEN message references http://www.avahi.org/ticket/303 -- look
there for more information on why it's marked as such.
Chris
I found that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/22/11 5:28 AM, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:07:40 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote
Chris, Anton,
Thanks for your feedback.
4) add-on ports?
yes, this seems to be the case with latex, works fine.
I am not sure to
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:52:56 -0400, Greg Larkin wrote
Hi Greg,
[...]
If you can break the flightgear airplanes (or subsets of
airplanes) into a number of add-on ports, that would be one
way to avoid the huge download problem, as well as an
excessive number of OPTIONS in the base port. Of
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 01:35:48PM +0200, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:43:47 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote
Hi Anton,
print/teTeX is quite old. However, it's a critical
port for many people, and there is no easy update
or replacement (tex-live work is ongoing, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/22/11 9:13 AM, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:52:56 -0400, Greg Larkin wrote
Hi Greg,
[...]
If you can break the flightgear airplanes (or subsets of
airplanes) into a number of add-on ports, that would be one
way to
On 9/22/2011 9:38 AM, Greg Larkin wrote:
I don't use flightgear, so others would have a better opinion than me
about how to partition the airplane ports. Is there a forum on the
upstream distro site where you could ask?
You can also break them by first letter of the distfile names, combining
Hi gahr,
your fltk update seems to be ok to me (math/octave).
thanks
Nakata Maho
From: Pietro Cerutti g...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP --- Update to x11-toolkits/fltk coming
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:32:02 +0200
On 2011-Sep-22, 16:30, Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi *, now I'm testing
2011/9/22 Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com:
Hi gahr,
your fltk update seems to be ok to me (math/octave).
That's a good news.
wen
thanks
Nakata Maho
From: Pietro Cerutti g...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP --- Update to x11-toolkits/fltk coming
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:32:02 +0200
On
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
1) providing only a subset of available airplanes (i.e. *not* every
single airplane available on the FTP servers). This would be nice, but
requires to set up a list of the best planes to include (top 30 best
planes ?), and that list may not be the
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:57:58AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
I don't use this program either, but my first reaction was to break
it into broad categories.
For example:
aircraft-required
aircraft-25-most-popular
aircraft-civilian-prop
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:47 AM, tho...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hey everyone, I maintain devel/doxygen (sorry I didn't add my 2 cents
earlier, I've been a bit busy) and was looking at this particular thread. I
know someone filed a PR regarding the circular dependency, stating that it
might be
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:38:33 -0400, Greg Larkin wrote
You can also break them by first letter of the distfile names,
combining where appropriate.
[...]
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:57:58 -0400, Robert Huff wrote
my first reaction was to break it into broad categories.
For example:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:09:57AM -0500, Scot Hetzel wrote:
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:09:57 -0500
From: Scot Hetzel swhet...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Circular dependency in devel/doxygen?
To: tho...@freebsd.org, muel...@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:47
Mainly features introduced by external patches should be tested.
They work for me, but maybe someone will find some regressions.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any
25 matches
Mail list logo
