Am 23.01.2012 07:28 (UTC+1) schrieb Hiroki Sato:
Da Rock wrote
in<4f139c43.1050...@herveybayaustralia.com.au>:
fr> I'm trying to contact the maintainer of the acroread ports to see if
fr> they can put in a dependency on linux-f10-cups-libs for the ease of
fr> use by general users, and to
On 01/23/12 16:28, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Da Rock wrote
in<4f139c43.1050...@herveybayaustralia.com.au>:
fr> I'm trying to contact the maintainer of the acroread ports to see if
fr> they can put in a dependency on linux-f10-cups-libs for the ease of
fr> use by general users, and to enable acce
Da Rock wrote
in <4f139c43.1050...@herveybayaustralia.com.au>:
fr> I'm trying to contact the maintainer of the acroread ports to see if
fr> they can put in a dependency on linux-f10-cups-libs for the ease of
fr> use by general users, and to enable acceptance by the graphics
fr> industry niche.
> > > > I've stumbled across a weird issue with building the
> > > > databases/mysql-workbench52 port on a brandnew / fresh FreeBSD 9
> > > > RELEASE machine:
> > > its in the makefile for mysql-workbench51
> > > DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER= 51
> > > IGNORE_WITH_MYSQL= 41 55
> > >
> > > you can
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Erich Dollansky wrote:
I wonder why I should run FreeBSD under VMware.
There is some Dell Blade Hardware that I could not get to run FreeBSD 8.
So I installed ESXi and installed FreeBSD as a VM so I didn't have to
switch providers. It works OK.
I do not know anybody
FWIW, we're running a number of fbsd servers under vmware here at
missouri.edu. Aside from ntpd issues, remedied by running ntpdate from
cron, there have been no problems that I'm aware of. I can forward a
8.2 kernel config to anyone who's interested. It's nothing
special though.
Rich
_
On 1/22/2012 9:12 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 22.01.2012 02:15, schrieb Erich Dollansky:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wonder why I should run FreeBSD under VMware.
>>
>> On Sunday 22 January 2012 04:10:24 Jerry wrote:
>>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:12:53 -0500
>>> Michael Scheidell articulated:
>>>
I reache
On 2012-01-22 15:12, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 22.01.2012 02:15, schrieb Erich Dollansky:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wonder why I should run FreeBSD under VMware.
>>
>> On Sunday 22 January 2012 04:10:24 Jerry wrote:
>>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:12:53 -0500
>>> Michael Scheidell articulated:
>>>
I reached
On 2012-01-21 21:12, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> I reached out to a high level sr engineer at VMware and told him there was a
> lot of companies using FreeBSD on VMware, and a lot more that would, if just
> VMware gave us some love (fixed, or helped us fix some device drivers).
>
> He asked "how
on 22/01/2012 16:12 Matthias Andree said the following:
> Am 22.01.2012 02:15, schrieb Erich Dollansky:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wonder why I should run FreeBSD under VMware.
>>
>> On Sunday 22 January 2012 04:10:24 Jerry wrote:
>>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:12:53 -0500
>>> Michael Scheidell articulated:
>>>
>>
2012/1/22 Tobias Rehbein :
> Hi all,
>
> I will participate in a GIMP workshop this wednesday. GIMP 2.7.4 will be used
> in
> this workshop. As this is a development snapshot and therefore not in the
> ports tree I
> wondered if anyone on this list has an unofficial port of GIMP 2.7.4 I could
> u
On 22 Jan 2012 15:25, "t...@diogunix.com" wrote:
>
> > > I've stumbled across a weird issue with building the databases/mysql-
> >
> > > workbench52 port on a brandnew / fresh FreeBSD 9 RELEASE machine:
> > its in the makefile for mysql-workbench51
> > DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER= 51
> > IGNORE_WITH_MY
I now tried to build the same port on an older machine ruunning
- FreeBSD 8 / KDE
- MySQL 5.1
Result:
The build was successful in so far as I did not get any compile errors.
But when trying to start the Workbench, it just crashes (needs to get
killed). There's not even a splash screen.
Did n
> > I've stumbled across a weird issue with building the databases/mysql-
>
> > workbench52 port on a brandnew / fresh FreeBSD 9 RELEASE machine:
> its in the makefile for mysql-workbench51
> DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER= 51
> IGNORE_WITH_MYSQL= 41 55
>
> the maintainer thinks it won't work with m
On 01/23/12 01:13, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:44:25 + Chris Rees wrote:
On 22 January 2012 13:13, Da Rock
wrote:
I'm back to resolve some issues with my new port ports/164113.
I have to not install license as per instructions in the porters
handbook (which I wasn
On 01/23/12 00:54, Chris Rees wrote:
On 22 January 2012 13:55, Da Rock
wrote:
On 01/22/12 23:44, Chris Rees wrote:
On 22 January 2012 13:13, Da Rock
wrote:
I'm back to resolve some issues with my new port ports/164113.
I have to not install license as per instructions in the porters han
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:44:25 + Chris Rees wrote:
> On 22 January 2012 13:13, Da Rock
> wrote:
> > I'm back to resolve some issues with my new port ports/164113.
> >
> > I have to not install license as per instructions in the porters
> > handbook (which I wasn't aware it was doing). What is
On 22 January 2012 13:55, Da Rock
wrote:
> On 01/22/12 23:44, Chris Rees wrote:
>>
>> On 22 January 2012 13:13, Da Rock
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm back to resolve some issues with my new port ports/164113.
>>>
>>> I have to not install license as per instructions in the porters handbook
>>> (which I
Am 22.01.2012 02:15, schrieb Erich Dollansky:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder why I should run FreeBSD under VMware.
>
> On Sunday 22 January 2012 04:10:24 Jerry wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:12:53 -0500
>> Michael Scheidell articulated:
>>
>>> I reached out to a high level sr engineer at VMware and told h
On 01/22/12 23:44, Chris Rees wrote:
On 22 January 2012 13:13, Da Rock
wrote:
I'm back to resolve some issues with my new port ports/164113.
I have to not install license as per instructions in the porters handbook
(which I wasn't aware it was doing). What is the best way to achieve this?
Hu
On 22 January 2012 13:13, Da Rock
wrote:
> I'm back to resolve some issues with my new port ports/164113.
>
> I have to not install license as per instructions in the porters handbook
> (which I wasn't aware it was doing). What is the best way to achieve this?
Huh? Why don't you want to install t
I'm back to resolve some issues with my new port ports/164113.
I have to not install license as per instructions in the porters
handbook (which I wasn't aware it was doing). What is the best way to
achieve this?
I have already put in the Makefile (thanks Alex):
NO_LICENSES_INSTALL=yes
and i
Hi all,
I will participate in a GIMP workshop this wednesday. GIMP 2.7.4 will be used in
this workshop. As this is a development snapshot and therefore not in the ports
tree I
wondered if anyone on this list has an unofficial port of GIMP 2.7.4 I could
use?
gn...@freebsd.org, being the maintaine
On 21/01/2012 20:46, Mark Linimon wrote:
> tl;dr: I want to switch the default assumption we're making.
>
> IMHO when new ports come into the tree, we should make our default
> assumption that we will try to build them on amd64 and i386. For cases
> that this does not hold, we consider this Bad a
> I do not know anybody who runs FreeBSD in a VM. All run it native on
> their machines.
i do, servers in tokyo and seattle. and am quite happy. i know a bunch
of folk who do.
i am trying to understand the relationship between $subject, end of net
predicted, and the op calling vmware and being
On 21 Jan 2012 20:46, "Mark Linimon" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:20:05AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > Actually I take your point, that it should be possible to distinguish
> > between ports that permanently won't work on some architectures by
> > design, and ports that temporarily do
26 matches
Mail list logo
