INDEX now builds successfully on 8.x

2014-02-08 Thread Ports Index build
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Error build the port devel/glib20

2014-02-08 Thread John Hein
Guido Falsi wrote at 09:05 +0100 on Feb 8, 2014: > On 02/08/14 02:20, John Hein wrote: > > Vladislav Prodan wrote at 02:18 +0200 on Feb 8, 2014: > > > # uname -a > > > FreeBSD vm-10-1.domain.com 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r261419: > > Mon Feb 3 02:57:25 UTC 2014 > > r...@gr

Re: INDEX build failed for 8.x

2014-02-08 Thread Bryan Drewery
My bad. It's been fixed. On 2/8/2014 9:17 PM, Ports Index build wrote: > INDEX build failed with errors: > Generating INDEX-8 - please > wait.."/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 6613: if-less endif > make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > ===> accessibility/ruby-at

INDEX build failed for 8.x

2014-02-08 Thread Ports Index build
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-8 - please wait.."/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 6613: if-less endif make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue ===> accessibility/ruby-atk failed *** [describe.accessibility] Error code 1 "/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/M

Creating files for FreeBSD from Linux files in WebRTC

2014-02-08 Thread Joe Nosay
In trunk/webrtc/modules in the sub-directories of video_capture, video_render and audio_device need to have a directory named freebsd in each. Both the linux and mac sub-directories reference the mixer, capture, and other parts of the system. Which ports in audio and multimedia have FreeBSD as a p

Creation of WebRTC directories to create a FreeBSD port

2014-02-08 Thread Joe Nosay
In the following directory trunk/webrtc/test there needs to be a freebsd directory containing the three files attached. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr

Re: Trouble verifying a pkg-repo signature manually

2014-02-08 Thread John W. O'Brien
On 2/8/14 6:50 PM, John W. O'Brien wrote: > Hello freebsd-ports@, > > I'm trying to build and maintain my own package repository and > understand how everything is put together in the process. Right now, I'm > having trouble understanding how the signatures are made and verified. > The following s

Trouble verifying a pkg-repo signature manually

2014-02-08 Thread John W. O'Brien
Hello freebsd-ports@, I'm trying to build and maintain my own package repository and understand how everything is put together in the process. Right now, I'm having trouble understanding how the signatures are made and verified. The following should illustrate both the problem I'm having and how I

Re: avogadro update

2014-02-08 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 05:45:51PM -0500, Ajtim wrote: > On Saturday 08 February 2014 19:41:42 Alex V. Petrov wrote: > > For me stop build: > > > > [ 10%] Building CXX object > > libavogadro/src/extensions/surfaces/openqube/CMakeFiles/OpenQube.dir/moc_gaussianset.cxx.o > > usr/local/include/boost/

Re: avogadro update

2014-02-08 Thread Ajtim
On Saturday 08 February 2014 19:41:42 Alex V. Petrov wrote: > For me stop build: > > [ 10%] Building CXX object > libavogadro/src/extensions/surfaces/openqube/CMakeFiles/OpenQube.dir/moc_gaussianset.cxx.o > usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/detail/has_binary_operator.hp:50: Parse > error at "BOO

Re: [FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] Time to bid farewell to the old pkg_ tools

2014-02-08 Thread Nikola Pavlović
On 08/02/14 14:04, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Michel Talon wrote: >> So >> how to interact with local.sqlite? > > Thanks Michel, > Noted. Further, if you really want to debug and inspect with text tools you can simply do $ sqlite3 local.sqlite .dump > dump.sql or $ sqlite3 -csv local.sqlite .du

Re: [FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] Time to bid farewell to the old pkg_ tools

2014-02-08 Thread Nikola Pavlović
On 06/02/14 13:58, Rick Miller wrote: > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Daniel Nebdal > wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Rick Miller >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Big Lebowski >>> >> wrote: The ability to install certain package version, instead of inst

Re: ICU sweeping upgrade: bug or feature?

2014-02-08 Thread Kevin Oberman
Add gvfs, gconf2, ORBit2-2.14.19, libIDL-0.8.14_1, gtk2-2.24.22_1. (Almost all of these were needed for either clutter or clutter-gtk. On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Add atk, clutter, pango, gdk-pixbuf2, and json-glib-0.14.2. > > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Kevin

Re: Error build the port devel/glib20

2014-02-08 Thread Mark Knight
On 08/02/2014 01:20, John Hein wrote: > See the 20130904 entry in ports/UPDATING I'm hitting the same issue. Unfortunately some ports seem to require converters/libiconv from ports - e.g. converters/php5-iconv or net/avahi-app. First I removed libiconv per instructions in UPDATING and some ports

Re: ICU sweeping upgrade: bug or feature?

2014-02-08 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 12:26:44PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Add atk, clutter, pango, gdk-pixbuf2, and json-glib-0.14.2. > You can add everything linked to glib to stah list pgpMY7WiCMrIx.pgp Description: PGP signature

[QAT] r343384: 2x leftovers, 2x depend (fetch in security/luasec)

2014-02-08 Thread Ports-QAT
Update to 0.9.2. PR: ports/182075 Submitted by: Paul Procacci / Benjamin Podszun - Build ID: 20140208203800-32675 Job owner: l...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 9 minutes Enddate:

Re: ICU sweeping upgrade: bug or feature?

2014-02-08 Thread Kevin Oberman
Add atk, clutter, pango, gdk-pixbuf2, and json-glib-0.14.2. On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > You need to bump gobject-introspection and glib20, as well. I'll report > any others I find later after the rebuild of those you caught and a run of > pkg_libchk. > > > On Sat, Fe

Re: 10.0-release jail on head-hosted tinderbox (Was: Re: 10.0-hosted tinderbox: 8.4 builds broken?)

2014-02-08 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On 2/7/14, 2:18 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 01:36:45PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: It appears that really weird SRCBASE assumptions are made throughout the code. I'll have to put a temporary hack in to just make SRCBASE appear inside the chroot whatever it's set to. Settin

Re: ICU sweeping upgrade: bug or feature?

2014-02-08 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 12:14:56PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > You need to bump gobject-introspection and glib20, as well. I'll report any > others I find later after the rebuild of those you caught and a run of > pkg_libchk. > No glib only depends on icu if one option is set which default to of

Re: ICU sweeping upgrade: bug or feature?

2014-02-08 Thread Kevin Oberman
You need to bump gobject-introspection and glib20, as well. I'll report any others I find later after the rebuild of those you caught and a run of pkg_libchk. On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 06:11:43PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > On 02/

Re: ICU sweeping upgrade: bug or feature?

2014-02-08 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 06:11:43PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 02/08/14 12:21, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Today I started some ports' upgrade and icu went from 50.1.2 to 52.1. > > > > As soon as this happened, lots of applications are not working anymore. > > E.G. > > > >> %

Re: curl-7.34.0 +Threaded DNS resolver

2014-02-08 Thread Václav Zeman
On 02/08/2014 12:10 AM, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 8/02/2014 1:51 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I think there's an issue with the latest curl when Threaded DNS resolver >> is selected. >> >> On several boxes curl doesn't return for dns required requests, but does >> for ip's >> >> rebuil

Re: ICU sweeping upgrade: bug or feature?

2014-02-08 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 02/08/14 18:11, Andrea Venturoli wrote: BTW LibreOffice was not bumped, so it would not be recompiled by "portupgrade -r icu" or similar. Forget this, please. Now I see it bumped. bye & Sorry av. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing lis

Re: ICU sweeping upgrade: bug or feature?

2014-02-08 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 02/08/14 12:21, Andrea Venturoli wrote: Hello. Today I started some ports' upgrade and icu went from 50.1.2 to 52.1. As soon as this happened, lots of applications are not working anymore. E.G. % firefox XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so: Shared object "libicui1

Re: ICU sweeping upgrade: bug or feature?

2014-02-08 Thread Warren Block
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, Andrea Venturoli wrote: Today I started some ports' upgrade and icu went from 50.1.2 to 52.1. As soon as this happened, lots of applications are not working anymore. ... Hmmm... so, to make it short: # ln -s libicudata.so.50.1.2 libicu # ln -s libicudata.so.50.1.2 libicu

[QAT] r343362: 4x leftovers

2014-02-08 Thread Ports-QAT
- Stage support - Build ID: 20140208163800-16284 Job owner: m...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 7 minutes Enddate: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 16:45:06 GMT Revision: r343362 Repository:

Re: WARNING: devel/icu: recent update redners openldap-server and other ports unusable!

2014-02-08 Thread Chris Rees
Shane Ambler wrote: >On 08/02/2014 08:24, O. Hartmann wrote: >> >> Today a couple of updates has been introduced, one of them was an >> update of port devel/icu. >> >> I the good manner/tradition of updating UPDATING, I expect a >> warning/hint/advice a couple of days from now - when everybody

Re: WARNING: devel/icu: recent update redners openldap-server and other ports unusable!

2014-02-08 Thread Matthew Rezny
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:54:45PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > Today a couple of updates has been introduced, one of them was an > > update of port devel/icu. > > > > I the good manner/tradition of updating UPDATING, I expect a > > warning/hint/advice a couple of days from now - when ever

Re: [FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] Time to bid farewell to the old pkg_ tools

2014-02-08 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Michel Talon wrote: > So > how to interact with local.sqlite? Thanks Michel, Noted. Would you please consider running send-pr to submit that for man 5 ? Prepending EXAMPLES Appending SEE ALSO pkg(8) There is no src/share/man/man5/local.sqlite.5 in both 10.0-RELEASE & branches/-cur

ICU sweeping upgrade: bug or feature?

2014-02-08 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Hello. Today I started some ports' upgrade and icu went from 50.1.2 to 52.1. As soon as this happened, lots of applications are not working anymore. E.G. % firefox XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so: Shared object "libicui18n.so.50" not found, required by "libxul.so"

graphics/ufraw: build failure because of old icu dependency

2014-02-08 Thread Rainer Hurling
After yesterdays update of devel/icu it also seems necessary to update graphics/ufraw: #diff -u Makefile.orig Makefile --- Makefile.orig 2014-02-06 16:44:50.0 +0100 +++ Makefile2014-02-08 12:38:24.0 +0100 @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ .endfor pre-build: - @${INSTALL_SCRI

Re: avogadro update

2014-02-08 Thread Alex V. Petrov
For me stop build: [ 10%] Building CXX object libavogadro/src/extensions/surfaces/openqube/CMakeFiles/OpenQube.dir/moc_gaussianset.cxx.o usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/detail/has_binary_operator.hp:50: Parse error at "BOOST_JOIN" --- libavogadro/src/moc_pythonengine_p.cxx --- *** [libavogadro

avogadro update

2014-02-08 Thread Ajtim
Hi! Avogadro 1.1.1_1 update on reeBSD 10.0-RELEASE (amd64) doesn't work: > Compressing man pages (compress-man) ===> Installing for avogadro-1.1.1_1 ===> Checking if science/avogadro already installed ===> Registering installation for avogadro-1.1.1_1 pkg-static: lstat(/usr/ports/science

databases/firebird25-client needs version bump after icu update

2014-02-08 Thread Phil Stone
Hi, After devel/icu update to version 5.2, a run was done to chase icu dependencies. The port databases/firebird25-server was bumped as part of this run. Howerver, the client port, databases/firebird25-client, was not. Yet, this client port builds /usr/local/lib/libfbembed, which depends on icu.

Re: USE_GCC politic -- why so many ports has it as runtime dependency?

2014-02-08 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 08/02/2014 10:33, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 08.02.2014 11:29, schrieb Matthew Seaman: > >> Other than getting over the hump of implementing all this, will this >> result in a massively increased workload for port maintainers? It >> shouldn't. Essentially one port will now generate several s

Re: USE_GCC politic -- why so many ports has it as runtime dependency?

2014-02-08 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 08.02.2014 11:31, schrieb John Marino: > On 2/8/2014 11:26, Matthias Andree wrote: >> Individual examples aside, I recollect that one of the selling points >> for STAGING, together with pkgNG, was that we would later have the >> chance to split up one build into multiple binary packages. >> >> N

Re: USE_GCC politic -- why so many ports has it as runtime dependency?

2014-02-08 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 08.02.2014 11:29, schrieb Matthew Seaman: > Other than getting over the hump of implementing all this, will this > result in a massively increased workload for port maintainers? It > shouldn't. Essentially one port will now generate several sub-packages > instead of one package. This will be

Re: USE_GCC politic -- why so many ports has it as runtime dependency?

2014-02-08 Thread John Marino
On 2/8/2014 11:26, Matthias Andree wrote: > Individual examples aside, I recollect that one of the selling points > for STAGING, together with pkgNG, was that we would later have the > chance to split up one build into multiple binary packages. > > Not sure what other changes to the infrastructure

Re: USE_GCC politic -- why so many ports has it as runtime dependency?

2014-02-08 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 08/02/2014 09:37, John Marino wrote: > Your "solution" causes multiple issues for others, and for what benefit? > The libraries are not packaged individually. You would need to split > up every GCC package into at least two packages, and then change the > infrastructure to add the compiler as

Re: USE_GCC politic -- why so many ports has it as runtime dependency?

2014-02-08 Thread Matthias Andree
Individual examples aside, I recollect that one of the selling points for STAGING, together with pkgNG, was that we would later have the chance to split up one build into multiple binary packages. Not sure what other changes to the infrastructure are required (Mk/bsd.port.mk needs to be taught to

Re: USE_GCC politic -- why so many ports has it as runtime dependency?

2014-02-08 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, John. You wrote 8 февраля 2014 г., 13:37:23: JM> No, it's all or nothing. And you are asking people to do a tremendous JM> amount of work to address a personal philosophy. While I can see value JM> in splitting out the gcc libraries into separate packages (especially JM> when subpackages

Re: USE_GCC politic -- why so many ports has it as runtime dependency?

2014-02-08 Thread John Marino
On 2/8/2014 10:24, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, John. > You wrote 8 февраля 2014 г., 12:32:23: > >>> JM> dynamically linked libraries. >>> JM> libcstd++ >>> JM> libgfortran >>> JM> libquadmath >>> JM> libssp >>> JM> libgcc_s >>> JM> etc,etc >>> 90% of USE_GCC-ports don't use libgrotran & libqu

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2014-02-08 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: USE_GCC politic -- why so many ports has it as runtime dependency?

2014-02-08 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, John. You wrote 8 февраля 2014 г., 12:32:23: JM> It doesn't matter, you get everything that is built by default. And you JM> need everything by default because sometimes gcc is needed for c++, JM> sometimes it's needed for fortran, sometimes it's needed for Ada JM> (gcc-aux), often the pac

Re: USE_GCC politic -- why so many ports has it as runtime dependency?

2014-02-08 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, John. You wrote 8 февраля 2014 г., 12:32:23: >> JM> dynamically linked libraries. >> JM> libcstd++ >> JM> libgfortran >> JM> libquadmath >> JM> libssp >> JM> libgcc_s >> JM> etc,etc >> 90% of USE_GCC-ports don't use libgrotran & libquadmath. Many of them >> doesn;t use libstdc++. virtualbo

Re: USE_GCC politic -- why so many ports has it as runtime dependency?

2014-02-08 Thread John Marino
On 2/8/2014 09:20, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, John. > You wrote 8 февраля 2014 г., 3:39:37: > > And it seems, that most of USE_GCC-equipped ports pull all this > development > toolkit for nothing! >>> DA> Well, some ports can be more or less difficult to get building with >>> DA>

Re: WARNING: devel/icu: recent update redners openldap-server and other ports unusable!

2014-02-08 Thread O. Hartmann
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:42:44 +1030 Shane Ambler wrote: > On 08/02/2014 08:24, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > Today a couple of updates has been introduced, one of them was an > > update of port devel/icu. > > > > I the good manner/tradition of updating UPDATING, I expect a > > warning/hint/advice a

Re: USE_GCC politic -- why so many ports has it as runtime dependency?

2014-02-08 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, John. You wrote 8 февраля 2014 г., 3:39:37: And it seems, that most of USE_GCC-equipped ports pull all this development toolkit for nothing! >> DA> Well, some ports can be more or less difficult to get building with >> DA> clang. So depending on whether the maintainer(s) wish to

Re: WARNING: devel/icu: recent update redners openldap-server and other ports unusable!

2014-02-08 Thread Shane Ambler
On 08/02/2014 08:24, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Today a couple of updates has been introduced, one of them was an > update of port devel/icu. > > I the good manner/tradition of updating UPDATING, I expect a > warning/hint/advice a couple of days from now - when everybody has > already stepped into th

Re: Error build the port devel/glib20

2014-02-08 Thread Guido Falsi
On 02/08/14 02:20, John Hein wrote: > Vladislav Prodan wrote at 02:18 +0200 on Feb 8, 2014: > > # uname -a > > FreeBSD vm-10-1.domain.com 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r261419: Mon > Feb 3 02:57:25 UTC 2014 > r...@grind.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > make B