Add DOCS to OPTIONS_DEFINE to ports that check for PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS.
-
Build ID: 20140715165800-27023
Job owner: ad...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 2 days
Enddate: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:40:09 G
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 09:57:44PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > 3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
> > 4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install apache, it
> > can't just be installed and not be
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 01:57:52PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 17 July 2014 13:54, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >
On 17 July 2014 13:54, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
>>
>> > On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> > > On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
>> > >> On Thu, Jul 1
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 01:21:32PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 17 July 2014 13:15, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> > On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 3) The bi
On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 13:21 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 17 July 2014 13:15, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> > On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 3) The binary pa
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
>
> > On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > > On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd
> > wrote:
> > >>> Hi!
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 17 July 2014 13:15, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> > On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd
> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 3) The binary
On 17 July 2014 13:15, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi!
3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
4) .. which means, when you d
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd
> wrote:
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> >>> 3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
> >>> 4) .. whi
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> 3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
>>> 4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install apache, it
>>
On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> 3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
>>> 4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install apache, it
>>> can't just be
On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> 3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
>> 4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install apache, it
>> can't just be installed and not be enabled, because that's a
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
> 4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install apache, it
> can't just be installed and not be enabled, because that's a bit of a
> problem;
No. Please NEVER do that! The u
On 17 July 2014 12:57, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> 3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
>> 4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install apache, it
>> can't just be installed and not be enabled, because
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
> 4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install apache, it
> can't just be installed and not be enabled, because that's a bit of a
> problem;
>
I disagree on this. For networ
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:52:38 +0200
"Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 22:40:36 +0200
> Serpent7776 wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 22:11:58 +0200
> > "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 21:12:23 +0200
> > > Serpent7776 wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 15 Jul 20
Hi!
3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install apache, it
can't just be installed and not be enabled, because that's a bit of a
problem;
5) .. and then we need examples of actually deploying useful
scenarios, like "so here's what you t
Hi,
I attend a lot of different Meetup groups in the San Francisco Bay Area /
Silicon Valley.
What I am seeing is the following usage pattern for new developers,
especially for web apps and cloud applications.
(1) On their desktop/laptop, they will generally be using
a Mac running OS X.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 02:54:09PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> Dimitry Andric skrev 2014-07-17 00:10:
> > On 16 Jul 2014, at 11:21, Leslie Jensen wrote:
> >> Hello list.
> >>
> >> I'm experiencing a very slow build of clang33
> >>
> >> It seems that it's when building clang33/work/llvm-3.3 th
Dimitry Andric skrev 2014-07-17 00:10:
On 16 Jul 2014, at 11:21, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Hello list.
I'm experiencing a very slow build of clang33
It seems that it's when building clang33/work/llvm-3.3 that is slows down.
Using top I can see that my system is almost idle, 99,4, and cc1plus has
Or why has it been moved into:
ftp.freedesktop.org/pub/mesa/7.6.1/
Hope you have a GREAT Day, after sorting out the the errors you lot sent
us!
Dr Sean J. Strand
--
D.Sc ESA, Ph.D ESA, MBA T.Can, ++.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On 07/15/14 06:36, Stefan Esser wrote:
What does this mean?
You are trying to delete the directory /usr/local, which is part of
the base system.
Just remove '@unexec rmdir "/usr/local" ...' from pkg-plist ...
Hello Stefan.
For some reason I didn't get your message and I see it only now...
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
Hi all,
I need some testers to have one unique libdrm what ever version xorg is used, we
know the newer version works properly with newer xorg, I have been testing so
far with old xorg and everything seems to work ootb.
Can anyone test and tell me if that works?
basically before and after the upd
1: Stagify.
2: USES=tar:bzip2.
Approved by:portmgr@ (blanket)
-
Build ID: 20140715163800-54141
Job owner: vani...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 40 hours
Enddate: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 08:31:46 G
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:11:19AM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, FreeBSD.
>
> I'm using 11-CURRENT (amd64) on my laptop and trying hard to use binary
> packages with pkg-devel. But attempt to upgrade installed packages goes
> crazy today. It trys to install ALL versions of gcc, ALL ver
27 matches
Mail list logo
