Re: postgresql93 port and libedit

2015-01-17 Thread Palle Girgensohn
17 jan 2015 kl. 01:41 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:02:22PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:27:14PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: Hi, I noticed that postgresql93-cl

Re: postgresql93 port and libedit

2015-01-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:37:49AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > > > 17 jan 2015 kl. 01:41 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:02:22PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin > >> wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:2

Re: postgresql93 port and libedit

2015-01-17 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:37:49AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: >> >> >> 17 jan 2015 kl. 01:41 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : >> >> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:02:22PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Ba

Cannot build FireFox on 9.3/i386

2015-01-17 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Hello. Due to the latest vulnerabilities, I'm trying to upgrade FireFox, but it stops on this error: clang++ -o Unified_cpp_content_media2.o -c -I../../dist/stl_wrappers -I../../dist/system_wrappers -include /tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/config/gcc_hidden.h -DOS_POSIX=1 -D

Re: postgresql93 port and libedit

2015-01-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:38:10AM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:37:49AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > >> > >> > >> 17 jan 2015 kl. 01:41 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : > >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:

Re: postgresql93 port and libedit

2015-01-17 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:38:10AM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:37:49AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> 17 jan 2015 kl. 01:41

Re: postgresql93 port and libedit

2015-01-17 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:38:10AM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Baptiste Daroussin >>> wrote: >>> > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:37:49AM +010

CURRENT breaks loading of nvidia.so

2015-01-17 Thread Bob Willcox
Yesterday when I upgraded my current box I encountered this failure when attempting to load the nvidia-driver (nvidia.so): link_elf_obj: symbol _callout_stop_safe undefined linker_load_file: Unsupported file type So, today I updtated my system again today hoping it might be fixed but the problem

Re: CURRENT breaks loading of nvidia.so

2015-01-17 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 01/17/15 16:18, Bob Willcox wrote: Yesterday when I upgraded my current box I encountered this failure when attempting to load the nvidia-driver (nvidia.so): link_elf_obj: symbol _callout_stop_safe undefined linker_load_file: Unsupported file type So, today I updtated my system again today h

Re: CURRENT breaks loading of nvidia.so

2015-01-17 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 04:45:04PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 01/17/15 16:18, Bob Willcox wrote: > > Yesterday when I upgraded my current box I encountered this failure when > > attempting to load the nvidia-driver (nvidia.so): > > > > link_elf_obj: symbol _callout_stop_safe undefined >

Re: CURRENT breaks loading of nvidia.so

2015-01-17 Thread Andreas Tobler
On 17.01.15 16:18, Bob Willcox wrote: Yesterday when I upgraded my current box I encountered this failure when attempting to load the nvidia-driver (nvidia.so): link_elf_obj: symbol _callout_stop_safe undefined linker_load_file: Unsupported file type So, today I updtated my system again today h

Re: Cannot build FireFox on 9.3/i386

2015-01-17 Thread Jan Beich
Andrea Venturoli writes: > Due to the latest vulnerabilities, I'm trying to upgrade FireFox, but > it stops on this error: > > In file included from > /tmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-i386-portbld-freebsd9.3/content/media/Unified_cpp_content_media1.cpp:29: > /tmp/usr/ports/www/

updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer)

2015-01-17 Thread Marco Beishuizen
Hi, I am the port maintainer of the alpine port, nevertheless not a very experienced one. The alpine mailer has recently been updated from 2.11 to 2.20 and I as a maintainer would like to update the port to the new version. According to the porter's handbook I have to use diff to create a p

Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer)

2015-01-17 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I am the port maintainer of the alpine port, nevertheless not a very > experienced one. > > The alpine mailer has recently been updated from 2.11 to 2.20 and I as a > maintainer would like to update the port to the new version. > > According to the porter's handbook I have to use diff to

Re:PVC cards supplier

2015-01-17 Thread Jason
Dear Sir/Madam, A Smile day for you ! This is eva of a professional RFID card manufacturer from China . To welcome your Christmas Day,we prepare some presents for you,all of products are with an amazing discount ,some as follow for your reference: Mifare FM1108 1K (FUDAN) blank card-$ 0.093/pcs

Re: Cannot build FireFox on 9.3/i386

2015-01-17 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 01/17/15 17:19, Jan Beich wrote: Already reported. std::abs(int64_t) for 32bit archs or std::llabs are not available in base libstdc++ or before 10.0-RELEASE (r255294) for libstdc++ in lang/gcc47 and earlier (libstdc++/54686). https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196772 Thanks

pkg segmentation fault

2015-01-17 Thread Patrick Powell
This just happened today. Any comments/suggestions? laptop_93: {356} # pkg -v 1.4.4 laptop_93: {357} # pkg delete p5-Archive-Zip Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 packages in the universe): Installed packages to be

[no subject]

2015-01-17 Thread Ronnie Miller
??? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer)

2015-01-17 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, the wise Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi Kurt, Thanks for helping. Unfortunately not all things went as planned. # fix distinfo, make makesum does this for mw make makesum This looked fine. # then I check the build and stuff on my test system (10.1-amd64) rm -rf work && make che

Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer)

2015-01-17 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > # then I check the build and stuff on my test system (10.1-amd64) > > rm -rf work && make check-plist > > [ some iterations later ] > > When I do the make check-plist I get an error: > > ===> License APACHE20 accepted by the user > ===> Found saved configuration for alpine-2.11_2 > ===

Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer)

2015-01-17 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, the wise Kurt Jaeger wrote: I normally proceed by moving all non-applying patches into a seperate directory and try if the build works: cd ~/myp/mail/alpine mkdir OLD mv files/patch-alpine__alpine.c OLD/ # and retry rm -rf work && make check-plist If the patch is require

Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer)

2015-01-17 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, the wise Kurt Jaeger wrote: > >> I normally proceed by moving all non-applying patches into a seperate >> directory and try if the build works: >> >> cd ~/myp/mail/alpine mkdir OLD mv files/patch-alpine__alpine.c OLD/

Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer)

2015-01-17 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, the wise Scot Hetzel wrote: On line 41 of the current ports Makefile, it shows tech-notes.txt: 41 PORTDOCSdoc= brochure.txt tech-notes.txt Then on lines 163-164 in the post-install stage it tries to install them: 163 .for f in ${PORTDOCSdoc} 164 ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}

Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer)

2015-01-17 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, the wise Scot Hetzel wrote: > >> On line 41 of the current ports Makefile, it shows tech-notes.txt: >> >> 41 PORTDOCSdoc= brochure.txt tech-notes.txt >> >> Then on lines 163-164 in the post-install stage it tries to in

Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer)

2015-01-17 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, the wise Scot Hetzel wrote: Are you using the correct version of the maildir.patch.gz. If you look on line 116 of the original Makefile, it shows: 116 PATCH_SITES= http://patches.freeiz.com/alpine/patches/alpine-2.11/ 117 PATCHFILES+= maildir.patch.gz You should change th

Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer)

2015-01-17 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, the wise Scot Hetzel wrote: Well, problems with the maildir patch seem to have dissappeared, but I'm not there yet. Alpine compiles, but the problems with the plist remain. I'll look further into the Makefile and see if I can solve this. The current error is: > Compr

Re: updating alpine port to new version (as a maintainer)

2015-01-17 Thread Ben Woods
Good news - that means the port is now compiling fine, and the last thing you need to do is fix the pkg-plist file to ensure it accurately reflects all the files the port will install: # cd PORTDIR # make clean # make # make makeplist That will dump the new plist to the console standard output, bu

Re: libfxp fails with poudriere but not as a port

2015-01-17 Thread Russell L. Carter
On 01/15/15 20:35, Russell L. Carter wrote: Greetings, amd64 stable/10, updated across the failure. I've been watching a poudriere build failure with graphics/libfpx for several days now and investigated, and it is a curious failure. Some advice solicited on the fix. With an updated poudrie

Re: CURRENT breaks loading of nvidia.so

2015-01-17 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Andreas Tobler wrote: > On 17.01.15 16:18, Bob Willcox wrote: > >> Yesterday when I upgraded my current box I encountered this failure when >> attempting to load the nvidia-driver (nvidia.so): >> >> link_elf_obj: symbol _callout_stop_safe undefined >> linker_load_

Re: CURRENT breaks loading of nvidia.so

2015-01-17 Thread Bob Willcox
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 07:48:37AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 04:45:04PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > The nvidia-driver package needs to be recompiled with the latest > > FreeBSD-current sources, because of changes in the callout subsystem. >

Re: CURRENT breaks loading of nvidia.so

2015-01-17 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 07:48:37AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 04:45:04PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The nvidia-driver package needs to be recompiled with the latest > > > FreeBS

Re: CURRENT breaks loading of nvidia.so

2015-01-17 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 09:22:06PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > ... > Can anyone tell me where PORTS_MODULES is documented? I don't find it in > the Handbook. It's not in src.conf(5). I've known of it since Doug B. (I > thing) wrote it. This is a very beneficial tool. It really needs to be well >

Re: Problems with fusefs-ntfs port

2015-01-17 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Stefan Ehmann: > After you get the "No such file or directory" error type > # dmesg | tail > Hopefully this will reveal a more helpful error message. Last message was a reference to "dhclient re0", which I did some time previous. > I'm currently not using fuse. But I think something like >

Re: CURRENT breaks loading of nvidia.so

2015-01-17 Thread Kevin Oberman
Any hope to get a bit of text on this into the Handbook? Maybe with the example in Doug B.'s e-mail announcing it. (It's in the ports archive and DuckDuckGo can find it easily.) The example in build(7) is for a single module while Doug's message show that they should be space delimited. -- R. Kevin

misconfigured package-build server causing bogus pkg-fallout messages

2015-01-17 Thread Perry Hutchison
Immediately after Poudriere reports the OSVERSIONs: !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1100052, Host: 1100050) !!! !!! This is not supported. !!! !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! !!! Expect build failures. !!! Given that, I suppose the rest of the error report is bogus, right