___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Basic context:
# dmesg | head
...
FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r279514M: Wed Mar 18 20:11:15 PDT 2015
root@FBSDG5C0:/usr/obj/usr/srcC/sys/GENERIC64vtsc-NODEBUG powerpc
gcc version 4.9.1 (FreeBSD Ports Collection for powerpc64)
...
# freebsd-version -ku; uname -apKU
11.0-CURRENT
INDEX build failed with errors:
make: stopped in /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports
make: no system rules (sys.mk).
Committers on the hook:
Most recent SVN update was:
Updating '.':
At revision 381786.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. One common problem is
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. One common problem is
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as forbidden in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.
An overview of each port,
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on
On 21.03.2015, at 15:50, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/21/15 14:50, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Which means that if unsetting X11 on in the port and not globally ocaml
is built with X11 and unison without - which poudriere will fail on when
it tries to find the dependencies...
On 03/20/15 01:11, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On 03/17/2015 07:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi
On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/20/15 01:11, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On 03/17/2015 07:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Mon,
On 03/21/15 18:58, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On 3/21/15 10:41 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/20/15 01:11, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On 03/17/2015 07:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On
On 03/21/15 13:26, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 11:49, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree
:o).
Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
Here
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 13:26, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 11:49, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree
:o).
Would you mind submitting
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree :o).
Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
Here is the patch:
Index: Makefile
===
--- Makefile
Gerrit wrote:
how can I lock the screen by keystroke or button?
That has nothing to do with FreeBSD. Or even with PC-BSD, for that matter.
It's part of the configuration of whatever window manager and/or desktop
environment you're using.
AvW
--
I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 11:49, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree
:o).
Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
Here is the patch:
Index: Makefile
Hi,
on two different FreeBSD systems I'm getting build this port with
%%ETCSSH%% variable.
Isn't some kind of bug maybe ?
Example from rc.d script - openssh :
if [ -f %%ETCSSH%%/ssh_host_key -a \
-f %%ETCSSH%%/ssh_host_dsa_key -a \
-f
On 03/21/15 11:49, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree :o).
Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240?
Here is the patch:
Index: Makefile
Hi there,
how can I lock the screen by keystroke or button?
On my FreeBSD machine that can be achieved by pressing Win-l or by
choosing a button in the shutdown menu on the top right.
On this PC-BSD machine I can't find a method to achieve this :-)
Best regards
Gerrit
---\nPBI
On 03/21/15 14:50, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/21/15 13:26, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
This leads me to think there is some misalignment of the X11 option in
your setup, that's why I asked for the full log of the failed build, I
need to check the environment.
[...]
No problem at all, thank you :-)
Dne so 21. 3. 2015 20:28 uživatel Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org
napsal:
On 3/21/15 9:22 AM, Ing. Břetislav Kubesa wrote:
Hi,
on two different FreeBSD systems I'm getting build this port with
%%ETCSSH%% variable.
Isn't some kind of bug maybe ?
On 03/21/15 17:55, Michael Grimm wrote:
On 21.03.2015, at 15:50, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/21/15 14:50, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Which means that if unsetting X11 on in the port and not globally ocaml
is built with X11 and unison without - which poudriere will fail on
On 3/21/15 9:22 AM, Ing. Břetislav Kubesa wrote:
Hi,
on two different FreeBSD systems I'm getting build this port with
%%ETCSSH%% variable.
Isn't some kind of bug maybe ?
Example from rc.d script - openssh :
if [ -f %%ETCSSH%%/ssh_host_key -a \
-f
On 21.03.2015, at 19:10, Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net wrote:
On 03/21/15 17:55, Michael Grimm wrote:
I recently (after last upgrade of poudriere-devel, although I do not know if
that is the cause) ran into a comparable issue with unison without X11 :
| MWN cat
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:37:13PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
Some of you may have notice some work on the font area.
The goal of this work is to prevent every single font package to act
differently
and most of the time not correctly.
The change will be done in multiple
Guido Falsi wrote:
Exactly.
There are four cases:
one asks for both with or without X11, works fine, in both.
This is all ok.
one asks for ocaml without X11 and unison with X11, this is wrong and
cannot obviously work.
Absolutely. But this in theory should disable X11 in unison
Basic context:
[I'm using an example taken from buildworld activity just for illustration.
Yes, I know that powerpc64 buildworld via clang is not yet supported.
buildworld is not the actual point here but does illustrate a pre-existing
build environment having the issue in question.]
#
ports-mgmt/portell can't be installed now because its SourceForge project has
disappeared. It looks like the author is now just using a GitHub Gist for it:
https://gist.github.com/rkulla/1122022
Is that usable?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
Hello,
I'm having a problem with the port handbrake.
From the Makefile:
# Created by: Andrew Thompson a...@fud.org.nz
# $FreeBSD: head/multimedia/handbrake/Makefile 374303 2014-12-08 16:48:38Z
tijl $
The build and install of the port succeeds, but the resulting installation
is broken.
On Mar 21, 2015 8:21 PM, Matt Klein mpkl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm having a problem with the port handbrake.
From the Makefile:
# Created by: Andrew Thompson a...@fud.org.nz
# $FreeBSD: head/multimedia/handbrake/Makefile 374303 2014-12-08 16:48:38Z
tijl $
The build and install of
Hello,
Since FreeBSD now has Clang and always had its own shell, a lot of
dependencies and options like bash, gnu, hal, gcc, and gtk aren't
needed for many ports to compile. Some programs (especially gtk
affiliated and linux emulation programs) still fail without gmake, but
there
32 matches
Mail list logo
