Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
Actually, I just noticed (when compiling the port), that the Makefile now says:
WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes
Yes, sorry, my fault. Fixed, and as suggested by mat: It is
now as IGNORE with a message explaining how to do it for 9.x.
Not sure about the IGNORE vs BROKEN but looks
Hi!
> Actually, I just noticed (when compiling the port), that the Makefile now
> says:
>
> WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes
Yes, sorry, my fault. Fixed, and as suggested by mat: It is
now as IGNORE with a message explaining how to do it for 9.x.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198293
Jason Unovitch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||junovi...@freebsd.org,
В Mon, 4 Apr 2016 09:01:44 +0100
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> I could be wrong though -- the only example I know of creating ad-hoc
> packages outside the ports, is by Dag-Erling:
>
> https://blog.des.no/2013/08/creating-pkgng-packages-without-ports/
> https://blog.des.no/2013/08/pkgng-without-ports-
Martin Waschbüsch wrote:
Umm probably a really bad idea... consider this or something more
creative/descriptive:
.if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100 && ${WITH_OPENSSL_PORT} !=
"yes"
BROKEN= You must set WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes in /etc/make.conf on Pre 10.x
.endif
... the
> Umm probably a really bad idea... consider this or something more
> creative/descriptive:
>
> .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100 && ${WITH_OPENSSL_PORT} !=
> "yes"
> BROKEN= You must set WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes in /etc/make.conf on
> Pre 10.x
> .endif
>
>
> ...
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
I'm testbuilding those ports right now and find that
they fail on 9.3amd64 with:
With this in the -server Makefile, all is fine.
.if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100
WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes
.endif
Umm probably a really bad idea... consider this or something
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
Could someone please have a look at this one.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208029
All patches got approval from the maintainer.
For all I can see this should be ready to be committed.
If I overlooked anything or more information is needed,
please le
> Am 05.04.2016 um 22:15 schrieb Kurt Jaeger :
>
> Hi!
>
>> Could someone please have a look at this one.
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208029
>>
>> All patches got approval from the maintainer.
>> For all I can see this should be ready to be committed.
>
> Done.
Thanks
Hi!
> Could someone please have a look at this one.
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208029
>
> All patches got approval from the maintainer.
> For all I can see this should be ready to be committed.
Done.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4
Hi!
> I'm testbuilding those ports right now and find that
> they fail on 9.3amd64 with:
With this in the -server Makefile, all is fine.
.if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100
WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes
.endif
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to
Hi!
> I'm testbuilding those ports right now and find that
> they fail on 9.3amd64 with:
>
> checking for OpenSSL support... yes
> configure: error: OpenSSL library version requirement not met (>= 1.0.1)
>
> So it seems that OpenSSL and 9.3amd64 do not build ? Should the
> default for 9.3 probab
Hi!
> Could someone please have a look at this one.
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208029
>
> All patches got approval from the maintainer.
> For all I can see this should be ready to be committed.
>
> If I overlooked anything or more information is needed,
> please let me k
Hi all,
Could someone please have a look at this one.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208029
All patches got approval from the maintainer.
For all I can see this should be ready to be committed.
If I overlooked anything or more information is needed,
please let me know and I'll
Am 04.04.2016 um 20:46 schrieb Grzegorz Junka:
> Port playonbsd depends on i386-wine-devel and pipelight depends on
> i386-wine-staging. So when I want to install pipelight pkg asks me to
> uninstall playonbsd. Does it mean playonbsd is incompatible with
> pipelight? Are two versions of wine really
Port playonbsd depends on i386-wine-devel and pipelight depends on
i386-wine-staging. So when I want to install pipelight pkg asks me to
uninstall playonbsd. Does it mean playonbsd is incompatible with
pipelight? Are two versions of wine really necessary? Wouldn't it be
better if ports were dep
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
17 matches
Mail list logo