Re: Mosh regression between 10.x and 11-stable

That's interesting (not in a good way). Next thing to try: mosh --server='/usr/local/bin/mosh-server 2>/dev/null' peter@VPS (with an unmodified mosh-server) Mosh prints the 'MOSH CONNECT ...' message on stdout, then forks. The parent exits immediately, and the child prints verbose and

Re: Help wanted for new port: linking error in FreeCAD

On 08/11/16 15:03, Pedro Giffuni wrote: ... I suspect the issue will solve relatively fast by building with GCC (and an updated linker) to build FreeCAD but I will try first with the Coin3D built using clang. For the record, it won't build with GCC, and setting USE_BINUTILS= yes

Re: Mosh regression between 10.x and 11-stable

On 2016-Aug-11 10:06:35 -0700, Ngie Cooper wrote: > >> On Aug 11, 2016, at 09:30, John Hood wrote: >> >> I still can't reproduce this on 3 different 11.0-BETA4 servers and a >> variety of clients and networks. Can you try and identify a more >> portable

Re: Help wanted for new port: linking error in FreeCAD

On 08/11/16 12:16, Kyle Evans wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Pedro Giffuni > wrote: On 08/11/16 10:43, Kyle Evans wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Pedro Giffuni > wrote: Hello guys;

Re: Mosh regression between 10.x and 11-stable

On 2016-Aug-11 12:30:23 -0400, John Hood wrote: >I still can't reproduce this on 3 different 11.0-BETA4 servers and a >variety of clients and networks. Can you try and identify a more >portable repro or at least figure out why it fails on your system? > >Please try applying this

Re: Perl upgrade - 5.20.x vulnerable

Hi! > Just a question: so there is a stable version (5.20 in this case) - see > in the ports collection that it is possible to install up to v5.24. Does > that mean that 5.20+ versions aren't stable or how should I interprete > these version availabilities? I'm using 5.20, 5.22 and 5.24 on

Re: Perl upgrade - 5.20.x vulnerable

In een bericht van 11-8-2016 20:51: The patch to update was committed only a few hours ago. The packages on the pkg reposities need a bit more time until they are available. Then perl (any version) will be secure. Thanks, will wait for that. Just a question: so there is a stable version

Re: Perl upgrade - 5.20.x vulnerable

Hi! > Can someone tell me how to best upgrade from Perl5.20.x to the latest > stable version? > > Tried to upgrade to Perl5.22 but got (also) the same issue while doing so: The patch to update was committed only a few hours ago. The packages on the pkg reposities need a bit more time until

Perl upgrade - 5.20.x vulnerable

Can someone tell me how to best upgrade from Perl5.20.x to the latest stable version? Tried to upgrade to Perl5.22 but got (also) the same issue while doing so: ===> Cleaning for perl5-5.20.3_14 ===> perl5-5.20.3_14 has known vulnerabilities: perl5-5.20.3_14 is vulnerable: p5-XSLoader --

Re: Help wanted for new port: linking error in FreeCAD

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > > On 08/11/16 10:43, Kyle Evans wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >>> >>> Hello guys; >>> >>> I wanted to take a look at bringing back some old engineering glory to

Re: Mosh regression between 10.x and 11-stable

> On Aug 11, 2016, at 09:30, John Hood wrote: > > I still can't reproduce this on 3 different 11.0-BETA4 servers and a > variety of clients and networks. Can you try and identify a more > portable repro or at least figure out why it fails on your system? > > Please try

Re: Help wanted for new port: linking error in FreeCAD

On 08/11/16 10:43, Kyle Evans wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello guys; I wanted to take a look at bringing back some old engineering glory to the ports trees by porting FreeCAD (from the Wanted Ports wiki). My initial attempt is here:

Re: Mosh regression between 10.x and 11-stable

I still can't reproduce this on 3 different 11.0-BETA4 servers and a variety of clients and networks. Can you try and identify a more portable repro or at least figure out why it fails on your system? Please try applying this patch, too. It's a shot in the dark, though. regards, --jh

Re: Help wanted for new port: linking error in FreeCAD

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hello guys; > > I wanted to take a look at bringing back some old engineering glory to the > ports trees by porting FreeCAD (from the Wanted Ports wiki). > > My initial attempt is here: >

Re: Help wanted for new port: linking error in FreeCAD

I guess, add to the Makefile LIB_DEPENDS=libCoin.so:graphics/Coin ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Help wanted for new port: linking error in FreeCAD

Hello guys; I wanted to take a look at bringing back some old engineering glory to the ports trees by porting FreeCAD (from the Wanted Ports wiki). My initial attempt is here: https://people.freebsd.org/~pfg/ports/freecad.tgz Unfortunately it only reaches 71 % of the build and I would need

Re: Port Makefile Automatically enable option

Thanks, worked. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Port Makefile Automatically enable option

On 12/08/2016 12:01 AM, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > Is there a command to "automatically" enables an option if another > option need it? As a user, there's probably some make.conf shell foo you could create. As a porter/maintainer, within the same port: OPTION_IMPLIES=OPTION There is a

Port Makefile Automatically enable option

Is there a command to "automatically" enables an option if another option need it? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Passwordless accounts vi ports!

+--On 11 août 2016 11:26:58 +0200 Mathieu Arnold wrote: | | | +--On 11 août 2016 07:05:05 +0200 "O. Hartmann" | wrote: || I just checked the security scanning outputs of FreeBSD and found this || surprising result: || || [...] || Checking for

Re: poudriere: howto build ports with 'make -j x'?

Chromium and Libreoffice are two programs that are massive and have the longest compile times in the ports tree along with eclipse. If the system only has 2 cpus I would expect those to take at least 4-8 hours minimum. If they are also building in parallel you can expect that to also increase. My

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: Mosh regression between 10.x and 11-stable

On 2016-Aug-10 14:32:15 -0400, john hood wrote: >On 8/10/16 4:18 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: >> I recently updated one of my VPS hosts from 10.3-RELEASE-p5 to 11.0-BETA4 >> r303811 and mosh to that host from my Linux laptop stopped working. All >> I get on the laptop is: >> $ mosh

Re: freebsd-update and portsnap users still at risk of compromise

For those not on freebsd-announce (or reddit or anywhere else it got posted) "FreeBSD Core statement on recent freebsd-update and related vulnerabilities" https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2016-August/001739.html Vince On 11/08/2016 05:22, Julian Elischer wrote: > On

Re: Passwordless accounts vi ports!

+--On 11 août 2016 07:05:05 +0200 "O. Hartmann" wrote: | I just checked the security scanning outputs of FreeBSD and found this | surprising result: | | [...] | Checking for passwordless accounts: | polkitd::565:565::0:0:Polkit Daemon

Re: poudriere: howto build ports with 'make -j x'?

El día Saturday, August 06, 2016 a las 02:13:39PM -0400, Ultima escribió: > If you plan on running build in parallel it maybe necessary to also > set MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER_LIMIT= into the make.conf file as well. I have a list of some 270 ports which poudriere should work through with 3 builders,

Re: Passwordless accounts vi ports!

On 11/08/2016 1:16 PM, Ngie Cooper wrote: On Aug 10, 2016, at 22:05, O. Hartmann wrote: I just checked the security scanning outputs of FreeBSD and found this surprising result: [...] Checking for passwordless accounts: polkitd::565:565::0:0:Polkit Daemon

Re: Passwordless accounts vi ports!

> On 11 Aug 2016, at 14:35, O. Hartmann wrote: > [...] > Checking for passwordless accounts: > polkitd::565:565::0:0:Polkit Daemon User:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin > pulse::563:563::0:0:PulseAudio System User:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin > saned::194:194::0:0:SANE

Re: Passwordless accounts vi ports!

> On 11 Aug 2016, at 15:36, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > My clamav and pulse users have a password field of * - i.e. they're disabled > (AND the shell is nologin) > > I suspect this is a bug in the check not the ports. Sorry, I just saw your next email, please disregard. It

Re: Passwordless accounts vi ports!

On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 15:29:03 +1000 Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > Olivier, > I've checked my 10.3Stable systems and they all have '*' as their password, > which is consistent with /usr/ports/Mk/UIDs. You might like to check the > age of the latter. > Regards, Dewayne. > PS