looking for a committer

Can someone look at these? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212625 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213150 -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: dependency explosions

Hi! > > Right now, we build packages for > > [9,10,11,12]x[amd64,i386]x[head,quarterly], that's 16 different sets, > > and we mostly manage to build them over and over again, every two days. > > Imagine how long it would take to build 320 sets. > You are trying to take that into extreme to

Re: Will 10.3 clobber my ports area?

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote: > Assuming the binary upgrade from 9.3 to 10.3 is "clean" i.e. it won't > clobber any of my local stuff (this is my only FreeBSD server), what will > happen to the ports area? Left alone, saved, or overwritten with/without

Will 10.3 clobber my ports area?

Assuming the binary upgrade from 9.3 to 10.3 is "clean" i.e. it won't clobber any of my local stuff (this is my only FreeBSD server), what will happen to the ports area? Left alone, saved, or overwritten with/without any local chnages? -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't

math/R slave ports and shared library

After some surgery, math/R is in more manageable shape. But, the surgery broke two slave ports, math/libR and math/libRmath. They have each been marked broken since June or July and I posted to ports@ about deleting them, but didn't get a response. math/libRmath I'm not sure how widely used

Re: dependency explosions

On 3/10/2016 5:14 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit : There is a need for a "minimum" install of a lot of packages. Some dependencies are often optional, and can be unchecked by running make config. but you can never really know the effect. there should

Re: LICENSE questions

On 10/03/2016 07:34 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 3 October 2016 at 05:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen > wrote: >> On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen >>> wrote: So I have a couple of

Re: dependency explosions

Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote on 10/04/2016 01:21: [...] Chromium? Opera? Emacs? Both OpenOffice and LibreOffice? I don't know if this always happens, but there's an issue here. I have a few unfinished thoughts about how it could occur, but so far all I can confirm is that there is an issue.

Re: dependency explosions

On Monday, 3 October 2016 at 20:41:08 -0400, Baho Utot wrote: > > On 10/03/16 19:21, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> On Monday, 3 October 2016 at 14:14:13 +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >>> Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit : Such a 'minimum' install should probably be the

Re: dependency explosions

On 10/03/16 19:21, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Monday, 3 October 2016 at 14:14:13 +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit : Such a 'minimum' install should probably be the default when coming in as a dependency, as there is an increasing tendency to

Re: dependency explosions

On Monday, 3 October 2016 at 14:14:13 +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit : >> Such a 'minimum' install should probably be the default when coming >> in as a dependency, as there is an increasing tendency to configure >> things with all the bells and

FreeBSD Port: lang/phantomjs

Hi, I noticed hand full of new dependencies after PORTREVISION bump to 4 because there is a new USE_XORG= x11 Is this really needed? Phantomjs worked for me for a long time without any X11 libraries. We are always trying to keep our servers with minimum ports installed. We have

Re: dependency explosions

Miroslav Lachman wrote on 10/03/2016 15:29: Grzegorz Junka wrote on 10/03/2016 15:11: On 03/10/2016 12:14, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit : There is a need for a "minimum" install of a lot of packages. Some dependencies are often optional, and can be

Re: dependency explosions

On 03/10/2016 14:48, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 03/10/2016 à 16:29, Grzegorz Junka a écrit : On 03/10/2016 14:11, Mike Clarke wrote: On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:11:43 + Grzegorz Junka wrote: Shouldn't all packages default to noX dependencies? If I am not mistaken FreeBSD is

Re: dependency explosions

Le 03/10/2016 à 16:57, Matthieu Volat a écrit : > On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:29:27 + > Grzegorz Junka wrote: > >> On 03/10/2016 14:11, Mike Clarke wrote: >>> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:11:43 + >>> Grzegorz Junka wrote: >>> Shouldn't all packages default to

Re: dependency explosions

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:29:27 + Grzegorz Junka wrote: > On 03/10/2016 14:11, Mike Clarke wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:11:43 + > > Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > > >> Shouldn't all packages default to noX dependencies? If I am not mistaken > >> FreeBSD is

Re: dependency explosions

Le 03/10/2016 à 16:29, Grzegorz Junka a écrit : > > On 03/10/2016 14:11, Mike Clarke wrote: >> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:11:43 + >> Grzegorz Junka wrote: >> >>> Shouldn't all packages default to noX dependencies? If I am not >>> mistaken >>> FreeBSD is predominantly a

Re: dependency explosions

On 03/10/2016 14:11, Mike Clarke wrote: On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:11:43 + Grzegorz Junka wrote: Shouldn't all packages default to noX dependencies? If I am not mistaken FreeBSD is predominantly a server-side system, with X running only occasionally I'd disagree with that.

Re: dependency explosions

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:11:43 + Grzegorz Junka wrote: > Shouldn't all packages default to noX dependencies? If I am not mistaken > FreeBSD is predominantly a server-side system, with X running only > occasionally I'd disagree with that. I don't know whether or not the

Re: LICENSE questions

Le 03/10/2016 à 14:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit : > On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen >> wrote: >>> So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have >>> licenses I can't find

Re: dependency explosions

Grzegorz Junka wrote on 10/03/2016 15:11: On 03/10/2016 12:14, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit : There is a need for a "minimum" install of a lot of packages. Some dependencies are often optional, and can be unchecked by running make config. Such a

Re: dependency explosions

On 03/10/2016 12:14, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit : There is a need for a "minimum" install of a lot of packages. Some dependencies are often optional, and can be unchecked by running make config. Such a 'minimum' install should probably be the

Re: LICENSE questions

On 3 October 2016 at 05:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: > On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen >> wrote: >>> So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have

Re: LICENSE questions

On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen > wrote: >> So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have >> licenses I can't find in Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk. How do I set LICENSE in >> those ports?

Re: What is SONAME in port builds?

Le 02/10/2016 à 21:07, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit : > On 10/02/2016 10:29 AM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: >> I am trying to build the port graphics/opendx, and at the qa stage it says: >> >> Error: /usr/local/dx/bin_freebsd/builder is linked to >> /usr/local/lib/libcdf.so which does

Re: dependency explosions

Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit : > There is a need for a "minimum" install of a lot of packages. Some dependencies are often optional, and can be unchecked by running make config. > Such a 'minimum' install should probably be the default when coming in > as a dependency, as >

Re: Google Code as an upstream is gone

David Demelier wrote: > 2016-09-29 17:36 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Arnold : > > Le 29/09/2016 à 17:03, Christian Weisgerber a écrit : > >> On 2016-09-14, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> > >>> Google Code has been deprecated[1] since March 2015, and read-only since > >>>

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,