Re: dependency explosions

Graham Menhennitt wrote on 2016/10/06 01:49: Sorry, I just read that UPDATING entry again. Cyrus is only provided to Dovecot if Postfix is present. I do not have Postfix present. So, I think that I do need to install Cyrus explicitly. So, back to my original question, why does "pkg autoremove"

Re: dependency explosions

Sorry, I just read that UPDATING entry again. Cyrus is only provided to Dovecot if Postfix is present. I do not have Postfix present. So, I think that I do need to install Cyrus explicitly. So, back to my original question, why does "pkg autoremove" want to uninstall Cyrus when I explicitly

Re: dependency explosions

Thanks for that, olli. I didn't understand how I'd missed the fact that Dovecot now included Cyrus. So I had a look at /usr/ports/UPDATING. Searching for Dovecot shows a mention of it in the entry at 20160228. However, that's entitled "AFFECTS: users of mail/postfix", and I don't use Postfix.

Re: dependency explosions

On 6/10/2016 8:20 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 05/10/2016 à 22:04, Julian Elischer a écrit : Another thing that might be good woudl be a way to tell ports "remove all the ports that were just build dependencies". pkg autoremove Thanks for that Mathieu - I didn't know about that one.

Re: dependency explosions

On 5/10/2016 2:20 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 05/10/2016 à 22:04, Julian Elischer a écrit : Another thing that might be good woudl be a way to tell ports "remove all the ports that were just build dependencies". pkg autoremove hmm I didn't know that would remove build deps for packages that

Re: dependency explosions

Le 05/10/2016 à 22:04, Julian Elischer a écrit : > Another thing that might be good woudl be a way to tell ports "remove > all the ports that were just build dependencies". pkg autoremove -- Mathieu Arnold signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: dependency explosions

On 5/10/2016 1:39 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Julian Elischer wrote on 10/05/2016 22:04: On 4/10/2016 11:38 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 05/10/2016 à 05:18, Julian Elischer a écrit : On 3/10/2016 5:14 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit : There is a need

Re: dependency explosions

Julian Elischer wrote on 10/05/2016 22:04: On 4/10/2016 11:38 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 05/10/2016 à 05:18, Julian Elischer a écrit : On 3/10/2016 5:14 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit : There is a need for a "minimum" install of a lot of packages.

Re: dependency explosions

On 4/10/2016 11:38 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 05/10/2016 à 05:18, Julian Elischer a écrit : On 3/10/2016 5:14 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit : There is a need for a "minimum" install of a lot of packages. Some dependencies are often optional, and

Re: dependency explosions

On 10/04/16 23:18, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 3/10/2016 5:14 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> [...] >> The bare minimum will never be the default. The default is what will >> fit most people, so that they can use our packages out of the box. >> > I didn't say it should be the default, I said it

poudriere jail build using -m src=

Hello, I'm attempting to create a new poudriere jail using the `-m src=/path` method. The poudriere man page states about the -m src= option; "*This directory will not be built from. It is expected that it is already built and maps to a corresponding /usr/obj directory.*". So I have first done a

Re: usage of openssl command in ports

Then you can just use: ${OPENSSLBASE}/bin/openssl to run the appropriate binary. You'ld have to use the SUB_LIST and SUB_FILES mechanism to get the resulting value substituted into pkg-install.in This is what I wanted, thanks! -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: dependency explosions

Le 05/10/2016 à 05:18, Julian Elischer a écrit : > On 3/10/2016 5:14 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit : >>> There is a need for a "minimum" install of a lot of packages. >> Some dependencies are often optional, and can be unchecked by running >> make

Re: usage of openssl command in ports

Le 05/10/2016 à 04:04, Koichiro IWAO a écrit : > Hi, > > I have a question about usage of openssl command in ports. > > If a port uses openssl command for example in pkg-install, how can I > determine which openssl to use? > I think if ssl=base, /usr/bin/openssl should be used. If ssl=openssl, >

Re: usage of openssl command in ports

On 05/10/2016 03:04, Koichiro IWAO wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question about usage of openssl command in ports. > > If a port uses openssl command for example in pkg-install, how can I > determine which openssl to use? > I think if ssl=base, /usr/bin/openssl should be used. If ssl=openssl, >