Re: Vulnerabilities in X libs

2016-10-08 Thread Dave Horsfall
On Sat, 8 Oct 2016, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > libXrender-0.9.9 is vulnerable > > libX11-1.6.3,1 is vulnerable > > > > "freebsd-update fetch" is not (yet) fetching anything. > > Depending on timezone, these were resolved last night. Update your ports > tree (svn or portsnap) and you should have

Re: Vulnerabilities in X libs

2016-10-08 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote: > May I assume that these are being addressed? > > libXrender-0.9.9 is vulnerable > libX11-1.6.3,1 is vulnerable > > "freebsd-update fetch" is not (yet) fetching anything. > > -- > Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who

Vulnerabilities in X libs

2016-10-08 Thread Dave Horsfall
May I assume that these are being addressed? libXrender-0.9.9 is vulnerable libX11-1.6.3,1 is vulnerable "freebsd-update fetch" is not (yet) fetching anything. -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." ___

Re: poudriere / logitechmediaserver: License SDL needs confirmation, but BATCH is defined

2016-10-08 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > On 8 Oct, Michael Grimm wrote: > > Don Lewis wrote: > >> > >> On 8 Oct, Michael Grimm wrote: > > > >>> as audio/squeezeboxserver has gone, I need to migrate to > >>> audio/logitechmediaserver. > >>>

Re: poudriere / logitechmediaserver: License SDL needs confirmation, but BATCH is defined

2016-10-08 Thread Don Lewis
On 8 Oct, Michael Grimm wrote: > Don Lewis wrote: >> >> On 8 Oct, Michael Grimm wrote: > >>> as audio/squeezeboxserver has gone, I need to migrate to >>> audio/logitechmediaserver. >>> >>> But I am failing to get this port compiled by poudriere (3.2-pre): >>> >>>

Re: poudriere / logitechmediaserver: License SDL needs confirmation, but BATCH is defined

2016-10-08 Thread Michael Grimm
Don Lewis wrote: > > On 8 Oct, Michael Grimm wrote: >> as audio/squeezeboxserver has gone, I need to migrate to >> audio/logitechmediaserver. >> >> But I am failing to get this port compiled by poudriere (3.2-pre): >> >> | ? >> | ---End make.conf— >> |

Re: poudriere / logitechmediaserver: License SDL needs confirmation, but BATCH is defined

2016-10-08 Thread Don Lewis
On 8 Oct, Michael Grimm wrote: > Hi ? > > as audio/squeezeboxserver has gone, I need to migrate to > audio/logitechmediaserver. > > But I am failing to get this port compiled by poudriere (3.2-pre): > > | ? > | ---End make.conf— > | >> Ignoring

Re: Upgraded

2016-10-08 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I've just updated a port I maintain (gohugo) for the first time. > I've made changes to the Makefile, distinfo and pkg-plist files, > then made an svn diff and attached that to a bug > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213309 > Do I now just wait for a committer to review

poudriere / logitechmediaserver: License SDL needs confirmation, but BATCH is defined

2016-10-08 Thread Michael Grimm
Hi — as audio/squeezeboxserver has gone, I need to migrate to audio/logitechmediaserver. But I am failing to get this port compiled by poudriere (3.2-pre): | … | ---End make.conf— | >> Ignoring audio/logitechmediaserver: License SDL needs confirmation, but BATCH

Upgraded

2016-10-08 Thread Ben Lavery
Afternoon all, I've just updated a port I maintain (gohugo) for the first time. I've made changes to the Makefile, distinfo and pkg-plist files, then made an svn diff and attached that to a bug (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213309

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2016-10-08 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,