FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2016-10-28 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

lighttpd 1.4.42 update does not work with FreeBSD 9.3

2016-10-28 Thread Cedric Berger
Since the update 6 days ago, lighttpd 1.4.42 does not work on FreeBSD 9.3 anymore. The binary fails to startup with: 2016-10-28 11:06:30: (plugin.c.227) dlopen() failed for: /usr/local/lib/lighttpd/mod_cgi.so /usr/local/lib/lighttpd/mod_cgi.so: Undefined symbol "pipe2” mod_cgi.c contains the

Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency

2016-10-28 Thread David Demelier
2016-10-27 18:35 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Arnold : > Le 27/10/2016 à 17:00, Matthew D. Fuller a écrit : >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:05:03PM +0200 I heard the voice of >> Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus: >>> Once you install openssl from ports, the ports framework will use >>> it, always. >> That i

Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency

2016-10-28 Thread Guido Falsi
On 10/28/16 11:28, David Demelier wrote: > 2016-10-27 18:35 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Arnold : >> Le 27/10/2016 à 17:00, Matthew D. Fuller a écrit : >>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:05:03PM +0200 I heard the voice of >>> Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus: Once you install openssl from ports, the por

Re: lighttpd 1.4.42 update does not work with FreeBSD 9.3

2016-10-28 Thread Guido Falsi
On 10/28/16 11:11, Cedric Berger wrote: > Since the update 6 days ago, lighttpd 1.4.42 does not work on FreeBSD 9.3 > anymore. > > The binary fails to startup with: > > 2016-10-28 11:06:30: (plugin.c.227) dlopen() failed for: > /usr/local/lib/lighttpd/mod_cgi.so /usr/local/lib/lighttpd/mod_cgi.

Update to nzbget port

2016-10-28 Thread Nicolas
Hi I have successfully updated the nzbget port to 0.17.1 and ran it without issues on FreeBSD 10.3 amd64. To compile it with clang 3.4, I have added the following things "-std=c++1y -stdlib=libc++" to the Makefile on the CPPFLAGS line. To create the package, I have removed the AUTHORS entry

New FreeBSD port

2016-10-28 Thread vladimirtt
Hello FreeBSD Ports Management Team, recently i have ported a Linux application to FreeBSD for my personal needs. I think it could be of benefit of other FreeBSD users to have the application under the ports tree. What is the usual procedure to create a new FreeBSD port ? Best regards, Vladimi

Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted)

2016-10-28 Thread Patrick Powell
On 10/26/16 03:56, David Demelier wrote: On 10/26/2016 09:32 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! I think unless FreeBSD makes explicit antichrist statement, there is no problem having a daemon mascot. I have never heard any religious problem so far. Or then I missed something. Approx. 20 years ago (?)

www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Michael Zhilin
Hi, Issue: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213299 (created 20 days ago). License of www/subsonic-standalone is GPL [1], but actually this version of software (v.6) is available only as free binaries. Also it includes trial version of functionalities which can be purchased by sub

Re: New FreeBSD port

2016-10-28 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hello, > Hello FreeBSD Ports Management Team, > > recently i have ported a Linux application to FreeBSD for my personal > needs. I think it could be of benefit of other FreeBSD users to have the > application under the ports tree. > > What is the usual procedure to create a new FreeBSD port ? I

Re: Problem with gcc5 std library when building ports

2016-10-28 Thread Patrick Powell
On 10/26/16 16:01, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: Have spent a couple of days trying to build around 800 ports with gcc5. This one has me stumped! Can anyone help regarding the apparant absence of snprintf from std? Am I missing something, perhaps LDCONFIG or? I've looked in /usr/ports/Mk/ bsd.gcc.mk

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Joshua Ruehlig
sure I'll take a look. I assume all I need to do is find and set the current license? On Oct 28, 2016 6:41 AM, "Michael Zhilin" wrote: > Hi, > > Issue: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213299 (created > 20 days ago). > > License of www/subsonic-standalone is GPL [1], but actuall

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Franco Fichtner
> On 28 Oct 2016, at 4:41 PM, Joshua Ruehlig wrote: > > sure I'll take a look. I assume all I need to do is find and set the > current license? I would like to take this opportunity to ask why we have a maintainer drop whilst doing the upgrade of a free 5.3 to a proprietary 6.0. What's the log

Thread issues

2016-10-28 Thread The Doctor
Script started on Fri Oct 28 09:40:37 2016 You have mail. root@doctor:/usr/home/doctor # portmascd /usr/source/php-7.0.13RC! /usr/source/php-7.0.13RC!: No such file or directory. root@doctor:/usr/home/doctor # cd /usr/source/php-7.0.13RC!1 root@doctor:/usr/source

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Joshua Ruehlig
Ohh, I realize earlier I'm not the maintainer and was only CC'ed on the first email. Regardless I'll go search to see if I can find the license for subsonic 6.0. Franco, what do you mean a maintainer drop? Also Madsonic, which is supposedly GPL based on their website is available. Thanks, Josh O

Re: Thread issues

2016-10-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 2016/10/28 16:45, The Doctor wrote: > I tought FreeBSD is POSIX threads compliant. It is, but unlike linux you need to use -lpthread on the compilation command line to use all of the threading functionality. So the question is: why didn't configure succeed in its test for exactly that? > chec

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Franco Fichtner
> On 28 Oct 2016, at 5:53 PM, Joshua Ruehlig wrote: > > Franco, what do you mean a maintainer drop? > Also Madsonic, which is supposedly GPL based on their website is available. The maintainer resigned, but updated to 6.0 because there were no distfiles, and the code seemed to be gone for 5.3 i

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Joshua Ruehlig
Did you read the post Michael linked? Version 6.0 is no longer GPLv3 because he added some code that couldn't be added to a GPL project. I don't believe the maintainer dropped the project. If a user wants to use a previous version they are free to modify the PORTVERSION, update the 'distinfo', and

Secret Shopper

2016-10-28 Thread ashley brown
Hello my name is ashley and im interested in the job. My phone number is 727-318-9147. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Franco Fichtner
> On 28 Oct 2016, at 6:30 PM, Joshua Ruehlig wrote: > > I don't believe the maintainer dropped the project. I was talking about www/subsonic, sorry for the confusion: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213298 > If a user wants to use a previous version they are free to modify t

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Vlad K.
On 2016-10-28 18:38, Franco Fichtner wrote: I was talking about www/subsonic, sorry for the confusion: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213298 This bug shows the discussion I had with the Subsonic maintainer (who is, technically, until that patch is committed, still a maint

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Joshua Ruehlig
Ahh ok, sounds good. Sounds like we should just follow suit with whatever www/subsonic does. Which seems to be thus far to remove the LICENSE line. On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > > On 28 Oct 2016, at 6:30 PM, Joshua Ruehlig > wrote: > > > > I don't believe the main

Re: openntpd-5.7p4_2,2 depends on libressl-2.2.6 ?!

2016-10-28 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Joe Holden: > I should be able to use rdomains in software ported from OpenBSD yes? You should, yes. Rtables are equivalent to FIBs, see setfib(1/2), and the net/openntpd port supports "rtable" on FreeBSD. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de

Using INSTALL_DATA to install header files to PREFIX/include/PORTNAME

2016-10-28 Thread Marcel Bonnet
Hello, porters! I've been reading the Porters Handbook, even the bsd.*.mk files... but I'm wondering: why the waf installer put all the installation files into STAGEDIR but the port system do not copy them all, just some of them to the PREFIX. Below the Makefile and pkg-plist. If do not type ${I