01.10.2017 01:44, Jonathan Chen пишет:
On 1 October 2017 at 11:29, abi wrote:
30.09.2017 20:06, Kevin Oberman пишет:
As a result, I am no longer able to track HEAD and, if the issue is not
resolved in some manner before 11 support ends, will be forced to move
from
FreeBSD after an using it fo
On 2017-09-26 16:05:08 (+0200), Mathieu Arnold wrote:
**Do not commit FLAVORS to any ports, a hook will prevent it, that
being said, do try it and test what can be done.**
There also seems to be a hook preventing new py3-* ports being added.
How should maintainers of Python3 ports proceed when
On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 23:49:14 +0100, Matthew Seaman stated:
>On 01/10/2017 11:34, Carmel NY wrote:
>> 1. Does it determine out-of-date update packages automatically or does
>> the user have to determine that what is out-of-date and feed them to
>> poudriere manually and in the proper order?
>
>Aut
from abi:
> > What sort of port options can portmaster support better than synth?
> 1. When port doesn't have options cached portmaster invokes dialog4ports
> (poudriere can't do it in proper way, synth doesn't do it at all)
> 2. When options become outdated portmaster invokes dialog4ports
> 3. po
02.10.2017 12:07, Carmel NY пишет:
While it will undoubtedly work, it is still more complex than the average
desktop user requirers.
Building from ports is already more complex thing than one could expect
from desktop user. I don't think ports are recommended way to keep
system updated. It you
On Oct 02 09:07, Carmel NY wrote:
On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 23:49:14 +0100, Matthew Seaman stated:
On 01/10/2017 11:34, Carmel NY wrote:
1. Does it determine out-of-date update packages automatically or does
the user have to determine that what is out-of-date and feed them to
poudriere manually and i
02.10.2017 12:22, Thomas Mueller пишет:
Downside of dialog4ports is burying options in a tree under /var/db/ports not
intended for direct modification by user.
Direct modification assumes you edit it directly, I leave this job for
dialog4ports.
I had to delete /var/db/ports/* but keep empty
On 2017-10-02 09:02, abi wrote:
1. When port doesn't have options cached portmaster invokes
dialog4ports (poudriere can't do it in proper way, synth doesn't do it
at all)
What do you mean it can't?
poudriere options -j jailname -p portstree -f /list/of/packages
No? And if you re-run this step
02.10.2017 12:51, Vlad K. пишет:
On 2017-10-02 09:02, abi wrote:
1. When port doesn't have options cached portmaster invokes
dialog4ports (poudriere can't do it in proper way, synth doesn't do it
at all)
What do you mean it can't?
' in proper way.
Issues I encountered when switched to poud
On 2017-10-02 11:57, abi wrote:
2. Dependency chain is not updated - if I disable B feature on port A,
poudriere asks me for options of ports implementing B. I have to
Ctrl+C after any option change.
I find that annoying as well, but isn't that just how the
config-recursive ports framewor
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017, the wise Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:21:31PM +0200 I heard the voice of Marco
Beishuizen, and lo! it spake thus:
Using portupgrade every day and still works great. Tried portmaster
once but liked portupgrade more. I use poudriere just for testing
p
On Oct 02 12:05, Vlad K. wrote:
On 2017-10-02 11:57, abi wrote:
2. Dependency chain is not updated - if I disable B feature on port A,
poudriere asks me for options of ports implementing B. I have to
Ctrl+C after any option change.
I find that annoying as well, but isn't that just how the
On 2017-10-02 12:05, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
I agree, imho poudriere is designed to maintain ports and testing
them, or if you have to build ports for lots of systems. And it works
very well for that too. But portupgrade and portmaster are imho far
better in just tracking newer versions of insta
02.10.2017 13:25, Matt Smith пишет:
On Oct 02 12:05, Vlad K. wrote:
On 2017-10-02 11:57, abi wrote:
2. Dependency chain is not updated - if I disable B feature on port A,
poudriere asks me for options of ports implementing B. I have to
Ctrl+C after any option change.
I find that annoying as
02.10.2017 13:05, Vlad K. пишет:
On 2017-10-02 11:57, abi wrote:
2. Dependency chain is not updated - if I disable B feature on port A,
poudriere asks me for options of ports implementing B. I have to
Ctrl+C after any option change.
I find that annoying as well, but isn't that just how th
On 28/9/17 9:25 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
On 26/9/17 10:07 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
SO imagine that I needed to be ab;e to reproduce the pkg repo as of a
articular day, is there anywhere one can look to see the svn revision
number that corre
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2017, Russell Haley wrote:
>
>> Thanks! I'll play with this on the weekend.
>
>
> Please create a review at https://reviews.freebsd.org/ and add me as a
> reviewer.
>
> Thanks!
Will do. Just a progress update: I got the handboo
On 02/10/2017 22:19, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 28/9/17 9:25 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
On 26/9/17 10:07 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
SO imagine that I needed to be ab;e to reproduce the pkg repo
as of a
articular day, is there anywhere one can l
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 10:28:49 +0100 Matt Smith wrote
> On Oct 02 09:07, Carmel NY wrote:
> >On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 23:49:14 +0100, Matthew Seaman stated:
> >
> >>On 01/10/2017 11:34, Carmel NY wrote:
> >>> 1. Does it determine out-of-date update packages automatically or does
> >>> the user have to det
On 2 Oct, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> I'm also not sure if poudriere
> is able to track ports on a STABLE system (as in my case).
Yes it can. If you use the svn method when creating a jail you can
chose any arbitrary source branch from the svn repository and then you
can specify any desired svn
On 3/10/17 12:25 am, Simon Wright wrote:
On 02/10/2017 22:19, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 28/9/17 9:25 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
On 26/9/17 10:07 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
SO imagine that I needed to be ab;e to reproduce the pkg repo
as of a
On Mon, 02 Oct 2017 09:44:26 -0700 "Chris H" wrote
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 10:28:49 +0100 Matt Smith wrote
>
> > On Oct 02 09:07, Carmel NY wrote:
> > >On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 23:49:14 +0100, Matthew Seaman stated:
> > >
> > >>On 01/10/2017 11:34, Carmel NY wrote:
> > >>> 1. Does it determine out-of-da
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017, the wise Don Lewis wrote:
Yes it can. If you use the svn method when creating a jail you can
chose any arbitrary source branch from the svn repository and then you
can specify any desired svn revision on that branch when you update the
jail. You would probably want to use
On Oct 02 20:01, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017, the wise Don Lewis wrote:
Yes it can. If you use the svn method when creating a jail you can
chose any arbitrary source branch from the svn repository and then
you can specify any desired svn revision on that branch when you
update
On 2 Oct, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2017, the wise Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Yes it can. If you use the svn method when creating a jail you can
>> chose any arbitrary source branch from the svn repository and then you
>> can specify any desired svn revision on that branch when you up
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017, the wise Matt Smith wrote:
I'm running 11.1-STABLE now, upgrading every few months or when there
is an important security fix. Do I have to build a new system twice in
that case (once my running system and once the poudriere jail)?
What I do is to initially create the ja
Hi,
The 2017Q4 branch has been created. It means that the next update on the
quarterly packages will be on the 2017Q4 branch.
A lot of things happened in the last three months:
- pkg 1.10.1
- New USES: (none)
- Removed USES: execinfo twisted
- New keywords: (none)
- Removed keywords: (none)
- Def
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 11:51:33AM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 2 Oct, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> ...
> > I'm running 11.1-STABLE now, upgrading every few months or when there is
> > an important security fix. Do I have to build a new system twice in that
> > case (once my running system and once
On Oct 02 11:51, Don Lewis wrote:
Yes, but at least the poudriere jail doesn't build the kernel bits. The
real pain point is that when you update the jail, the next bulk package
build will toss all the previously built packages and force a full
rebuild from scratch. That makes sense if you bel
On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 12:26 +0300, abi wrote:
> 02.10.2017 12:07, Carmel NY пишет:
> > While it will undoubtedly work, it is still more complex than the
> > average
> > desktop user requirers.
>
> Building from ports is already more complex thing than one could
> expect
> from desktop user. I don
This is a system where world was built with system clang 5
and there is no gcc 4.2.1 installed: only the system-clang
are on the old PowerMacs I'm testing on. The building of
ports was via poudriere and system clang.
Even with the lldb build, the lld build, the LIT build, the
Extras build, and the
On 3/10/17 3:01 am, René Ladan wrote:
can we please have a way of finding out the revision at which the
latest HEAD branch compile was done at?
(and for that matter the latest recompile on the quarterly branch).
Hi,
The 2017Q4 branch has been created. It means that the next update on the
qua
On 02/10/2017 19:58, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2017, the wise Matt Smith wrote:
>
>>> I'm running 11.1-STABLE now, upgrading every few months or when there
>>> is an important security fix. Do I have to build a new system twice
>>> in that case (once my running system and once the po
Hello Everyone, I wonder what is the procedure to find out whether anyone
is working on getting Nextcloud 12.03 in freshports..
It see that a lot of bugs were fixed...
.
https://github.com/nextcloud/server/pulls?page=1&q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22Nextcloud+12.0.3%22+is%3Aclosed
And the repos for 12.0
34 matches
Mail list logo
