Re: Debugging ports

2017-10-17 Thread Jan Beich
Kubilay Kocak writes: > On 10/18/17 8:29 AM, Jan Beich wrote: > >> Guido Falsi writes: >> >>> On 10/17/2017 23:11, Guido Falsi wrote: >>> > > Thing is, recompiling with WITH_DEBUG doesn't help (I only get > memory addresses in gdb), nor does

Re: Debugging ports

2017-10-17 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 10/18/17 8:29 AM, Jan Beich wrote: > Guido Falsi writes: > >> On 10/17/2017 23:11, Guido Falsi wrote: >> Thing is, recompiling with WITH_DEBUG doesn't help (I only get memory addresses in gdb), nor does -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug to CMAKE_ARGS (the port

RE: Openfire 4.1.6 compile failed

2017-10-17 Thread Doug Sampson
> During upgrade of openfire from 4.1.5 to 4.16 the following error was > observed: > > ===> Installing for openfire-4.1.6,1 > ===> Checking if openfire already installed > ===> Registering installation for openfire-4.1.6,1 > Installing openfire-4.1.6,1... > ===> Creating groups. > Using

Openfire 4.1.6 compile failed

2017-10-17 Thread Doug Sampson
During upgrade of openfire from 4.1.5 to 4.16 the following error was observed: ===> Installing for openfire-4.1.6,1 ===> Checking if openfire already installed ===> Registering installation for openfire-4.1.6,1 Installing openfire-4.1.6,1... ===> Creating groups. Using existing group

requesting policy for Apache module installation (LoadModule manipulation)

2017-10-17 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Hello, I would like to ask some changes in how Apache modules are installed. There are many maintainers and many different sources for Apache modules. Some modules are installing sample files, some are modifying httpd.conf (LoadModule line) after each install / deinstall. The modification

Re: Debugging ports

2017-10-17 Thread Piotr Kubaj via freebsd-ports
I think I got it. It turns out that it's our gdb in base that can't read the debug info. lldb and gdb from ports do it just fine. I also thought about recompiling library dependecies, but something didn't fit in, because not only the libraries calls were not there, but the calls from the port

Re: Debugging ports

2017-10-17 Thread Jan Beich
Guido Falsi writes: > On 10/17/2017 23:11, Guido Falsi wrote: > >>> >>> Thing is, recompiling with WITH_DEBUG doesn't help (I only get >>> memory addresses in gdb), nor does -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug to >>> CMAKE_ARGS (the port uses CMake). > > Sorry, I clearly did not parse

Re: Debugging ports

2017-10-17 Thread Guido Falsi
On 10/17/2017 23:11, Guido Falsi wrote: Thing is, recompiling with WITH_DEBUG doesn't help (I only get memory addresses in gdb), nor does -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug to CMAKE_ARGS (the port uses CMake). Sorry, I clearly did not parse your message correctly. Looks strange though, WITH_DEBUG

Re: Debugging ports

2017-10-17 Thread Jan Beich
Piotr Kubaj via freebsd-ports writes: > Hi all, > > I am preparing a new port. However, I hit an assertion fail when > starting the binary. The developer is willing to help me, provided > that I send him backtrace and values from the structure that hits > assertion

Re: Debugging ports

2017-10-17 Thread Guido Falsi
On 10/17/2017 18:04, Piotr Kubaj via freebsd-ports wrote: Hi all, I am preparing a new port. However, I hit an assertion fail when starting the binary. The developer is willing to help me, provided that I send him backtrace and values from the structure that hits assertion failure. Thing

Re: svn commit: r424112 - in head/www/fcgiwrap: . files

2017-10-17 Thread Xin LI
Hi, Mathieu, Sorry for catching this late, but is there any reason not to simply run the daemon under the desired credentials, instead of doing this chown/chmod dance afterward? Not all systems start fcgiwrap daemon quick enough for the socket to show up (a race condition, with potential of not

Re: FreeBSD Port: py27-fail2ban-0.10.1

2017-10-17 Thread Janky Jay, III
Hi Alex, On 10/17/2017 10:35 AM, Alex V. Petrov wrote: > What should be in pf.conf? > Something as simple has the below should work (edit to however you see fit): # define macros for each network interface ext_if = "em0" icmp_types = "echoreq" allproto = "{ tcp, udp, ipv6, icmp, esp,

Re: PR looking for committer

2017-10-17 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218870 If I look at x11-wm/lxsession/Makefile, it already has a LIB_DEPENDS on libck-connector.so:sysutils/consolekit2 -- so what is needed for this to be done ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years

PR looking for committer

2017-10-17 Thread Mikaël Urankar
Hi, Can a committer have a look at these PR? I will close them at the end of the month if nothing happens. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221589 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218870 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221858 Thanks in advance

Hosted PBX/Cloud PBX Updated User List Including Emails

2017-10-17 Thread flora . collins
style="background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">Hello,

Re: FreeBSD Port: py27-fail2ban-0.10.1

2017-10-17 Thread Alex V. Petrov
What should be in pf.conf? 17.10.2017 23:15, Janky Jay, III пишет: > In the new 0.10 version, the action rule creates the tables for you > based on the jail configuration. If you look at the jail files, you'll > see that you now call pfctl using additional arguments such as ports > that are

Re: FreeBSD Port: py27-fail2ban-0.10.1

2017-10-17 Thread Janky Jay, III
Hello, In the new 0.10 version, the action rule creates the tables for you based on the jail configuration. If you look at the jail files, you'll see that you now call pfctl using additional arguments such as ports that are affected and a suffix to add to the default "f2b-" table name.

Debugging ports

2017-10-17 Thread Piotr Kubaj via freebsd-ports
Hi all, I am preparing a new port. However, I hit an assertion fail when starting the binary. The developer is willing to help me, provided that I send him backtrace and values from the structure that hits assertion failure. Thing is, recompiling with WITH_DEBUG doesn't help (I only get

Re: FreeBSD Port: py27-fail2ban-0.10.1

2017-10-17 Thread Alex V. Petrov
In the old version I did so. 17.10.2017 19:47, Tommy Scheunemann пишет: > Hi, > > a simple setup that does the job for me: > > In /etc/pf.conf (bge0 is my external interface) > > --- SNIP --- > int_ext="bge0" > ... > table > ... > block in quick on $int_ext from to any > ... > --- SNIP ---

Re: FreeBSD Port: py27-fail2ban-0.10.1

2017-10-17 Thread Tommy Scheunemann
Hi, a simple setup that does the job for me: In /etc/pf.conf (bge0 is my external interface) --- SNIP --- int_ext="bge0" ... table ... block in quick on $int_ext from to any ... --- SNIP --- And in ${PREFIX}/fail2ban/action.d defining a new "pf" action, e.g. pf.conf --- SNIP ---

Re: Makefile cannot download from Sourceforge

2017-10-17 Thread blubee blubeeme
This is it, although I needed to change portname from zipios++ to zipios since the working directory lacked the ++ suffix. Thanks for the help! On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:32:26 +0800 blubee blubeeme >

Re: FreeBSD Port: py27-fail2ban-0.10.1

2017-10-17 Thread Christoph Theis
Am 17.10.2017 um 14:20 schrieb Alex V. Petrov: Need a working sample for the new version of the port for pf. Sorry, I'm not using pf and I'm not familiar with it. I'm even looking for a small sample /etc/pf.conf, so I can start playing around with it myself. Have a look in the discussion

FreeBSD Port: py27-fail2ban-0.10.1

2017-10-17 Thread Alex V. Petrov
Need a working sample for the new version of the port for pf. - Alex. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Makefile cannot download from Sourceforge

2017-10-17 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:32:26 +0800 blubee blubeeme wrote: > I'm trying to download some files from sourceforge but it fails constantly. > > PORTNAME= zipios++ > PORTVERSION= 2.1.1 > MASTER_SITES= SF/zipios/ It looks like this should be

Re: gnu ltdl and FreeBSD

2017-10-17 Thread blubee blubeeme
The error seems related to libudev. I tried adding libudev to the lib_dependencies like this below LIB_DEPENDS= libltdl.so:devel/libltdl libudev.so:devel/libudev-devd but the compilation still fails with this compilation error below, any tips on getting past this issue? gmake[4]: *** Waiting

Re: [ports]: GH_TAGNAME: how to figure out this tagname on downloadable archives?

2017-10-17 Thread blubee blubeeme
I expanded how to get the most up to date hash that works without going through the hassle of cloning the repo. Best On Tue, Oct 17, 2017, 13:01 Yuri wrote: > On 10/16/17 07:46, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > The first 7 digits may, or may not be sufficient. 7 is a magic number, > >

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2017-10-17 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,