Re: [HEADS-UP] Announcing the end of port CVS

2012-09-07 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- Beat Gaetzi (Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:36:32 +0200) * | All users who use CVS or CVSup to update the ports tree are | encouraged to switch to portsnap(8) [1] or for users which need more | control over their ports collection checkout use Subversion directly I just switched to 'svn'-ports on an

Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated?

2011-07-26 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Michel (Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:27:56 +0200) * | while most of people i hear are very unhappy with FreeBSD ports. Nuts. -- Alex -- alex-goncha...@comcast.net -- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: 8.2-PRERELEASE and Flash

2011-01-04 Thread Alex Goncharov
[ Suggest not to cc: freebsd-stable@ from this point on; freebsd-ports@ is added ] ,--- You/ben (Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:16:26 +) * | I've followed the steps at | http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/desktop-browsers.html without any | errors, except that neither Firefox nor any other

Re: shells/bash and the libiconv dependency mess

2010-08-17 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Jeremy (Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:01:14 -0700) * | On 2010/05/11, ehaupt committed the following patch: | | http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/shells/bash/files/patch-Makefile.in | | And bumped PORTREVISION (from 0 to 1) in the Makefile. This | unconditionally made bash require

databases/postgresql-odbc: MAINTAINER no more

2010-08-17 Thread Alex Goncharov
$ /usr/ports/databases/postgresql-odbc/Makefile grep MAINTAIN = MAINTAINER=alex-goncha...@comcast.net Please remove -- I am releasing my maintainership. -- Alex -- alex-goncha...@comcast.net --

Re: What's going on at Opera ? or is it only me ?

2009-12-04 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Arjan (Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:19:58 +0100) * | Unfortunately, our bug system is not open for reading by the public, but I | can tell you that this bug report has been received and is being looked at | by our build system maintainers

Re: status of FreeBSD ports you maintain as of 20090705

2009-08-04 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Doug (Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:26:08 -0700) * | - increase the number of volunteers/committers/testers... | This is the only valid answer for FreeBSD. `---* Take a look at the PR submission and update dates in

Re: ports/136263: New port: MySQL 5.4 -- requesting ownership

2009-07-22 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Alex (Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:36:11 +0200) * | I'll do it soon. I'd like to know who added the --enable-dtrace | configure option, when the default is to enable it! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=136263 / || || Originator: Alex Goncharov | || PR 136253 states: MySQL 5.4

Re: mysql 5.4 does not compile on FreeBSD 7.1 amd64

2009-07-22 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Alex (Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:23:10 +0200) * | Alex Goncharov ha scritto: | I think you did, when you took over the port. | | I understand you may feel angry because you didn't get the 100$ | donation. I'm sorry, but that's not my fault. I am not angry -- have a good day and enjoy

Re: Question about a failure report

2009-07-03 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Paul (Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:18:02 +) * | I just got a failure report for one of my ports: | security/barnyard-squil. That port is a slave port to | security/barnyard. | | ** | ERROR: unable to find mysql headers (mysql.h) | checked

Re: Mysq server 5.4 port

2009-07-03 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Philip (Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:09:32 -0400) * | | I'm not the maintainer :). You could help the process along if you've | already compiled it by hand. | | 1) Create a patch against ports/databases/mysql51-*, and | ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk | | 2) Send a pr in and request a repo copy.

Re: Question about a failure report

2009-07-03 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Paul (Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:56:48 +) * | Since mysql is preselected, the port *should* install mysql if it's | not installed. For some reason, If MySQL is in BUILD or LIB _DEPENDS . | Since it's a tinderbox, does it ignore OPTIONS and not install | dependent ports? Options

Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken

2009-03-12 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Jerry (Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:30:15 -0400) * | I am having the exact same problem. Several of my scripts are now | failing. I have modified a few with the older ` tic method to make | them work; however, I feel that the easiest thing would be to simply | revert to Bash-3. | | Was this

libX11-XCB [Was: X drivers depend on Gnome?]

2009-02-07 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- I/Alex (Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:22:27 -0500) * | ,--- I/Alex (Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:55:28 -0500) * | | ,--- You/Florent (Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:21:15 +) * | | | Please send patches. Kthxbye. | | | | Does this mean that you agree with me in principle and if I send you | | patches, there

Re: Xorg disaster

2009-02-05 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Lars (Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:20:50 -0600 (CST)) * | Xorg upgrade (gory details follow) went south. I must have a working | graphics browser by Monday. This is pretty much *vital*, as in a matter of | survival. Been there (last week) -- know what you mean. | What is the fastest and/or

Re: Xorg strange behavior

2009-02-04 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- Xin LI (Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:59:18 -0800) * | Is there anybody noticing that Xorg, when there is no mouse event, | would not respond to keyboard events? Sometimes application would | stall and moving mouse would make it resume... Yes -- I've been noticing this since about last August.

Re: X drivers depend on Gnome?

2009-02-04 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Alexander (Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:37:40 +0100) * | ,--- You/Jeremy (Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:19:12 -0600) * | | The pkg-config is not GNOME. Even the GTK+2 is not GNOME. | | I am VERY surpised about that you are whining over it. | | In other words, you think that making base X11

Re: X drivers depend on Gnome?

2009-02-04 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- I/Alex (Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:11:30 -0500) * | A perfect example -- you can see the difference in how X and openssl | approach this: ,--- You/m...@sysfault.org (Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:01:22 +0100) * | What you grep here are two completely different things. That's exactly what I tried to

Re: X drivers depend on Gnome?

2009-02-04 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- I/Alex (Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:55:28 -0500) * | ,--- You/Florent (Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:21:15 +) * | | Please send patches. Kthxbye. | | Does this mean that you agree with me in principle and if I send you | patches, there is a high probability they will he accepted (provided | they

Re: X drivers depend on Gnome?

2009-02-04 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- I/Alex (Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:11:30 -0500) * | The use of USE_ make file variable should conform to what bsd.port.mk | says, IMHO. | | | pkgconfig could be extracted from the USE_GNOME stuff, and it could | | even maintained by someone else than the FreeBSD gnome team, but the | | FreeBSD

Re: Xorg strange behavior

2009-02-04 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Robert (Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:37:18 -0500) * | | On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 07:53 -0500, Alex Goncharov wrote: | ,--- Xin LI (Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:59:18 -0800) * | | Is there anybody noticing that Xorg, when there is no mouse event, | | would not respond to keyboard events? Sometimes

Re: X drivers depend on Gnome?

2009-02-03 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Jeremy (Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:19:12 -0600) * | The pkg-config is not GNOME. Even the GTK+2 is not GNOME. | I am VERY surpised about that you are whining over it. In other words, you think that making base X11 blocks (such as drivers and libxcb) depend on Gnome, per this definition in

X drivers depend on Gnome?

2009-02-03 Thread Alex Goncharov
I am trying to disengage from the latest X, and have had reasonable success in this (thanks to everybody who had made the suggestions!): 1. Got the old (2008.12.23) ports tree and rebuilt the X-based components as necessary. 2. Restarted my desktop (resulting in a perfect work

Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade

2009-02-01 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- Alexandre \ (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:03:06 -0500) * | When I install the old packages, I can no longer rebuild and install | new (say `csup'ed on 2009-03-01) port components, as one whole -- I | can only do it selectively, excluding from the upgrade most | X-dependent things. That sucks

Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade

2009-02-01 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/vehemens (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:34:50 -0800) * | On Saturday 31 January 2009 04:20:26 pm Alex Goncharov wrote: | ,--- You/vehemens (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:54:42 -0800) * | | | On Saturday 31 January 2009 01:25:21 pm Alex Goncharov wrote: | | So, a *fundamental* (practically an OS

Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade

2009-02-01 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Matthew (Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:48:15 -0600) * | On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 04:25:21PM -0500 I heard the voice of | Alex Goncharov, and lo! it spake thus: | Csup can only go forward -- or can it go back?) | | You can specify a date in a supfile since, like, ever

Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade

2009-02-01 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/vehemens (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:36:04 -0800) * | On Sunday 01 February 2009 11:22:52 am Alex Goncharov wrote: | | Any data points to support the last statement? | | How about the last two xorg updates. Gnome has similar problems. Last two -- when (or what numbers)? | | You

Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade

2009-01-31 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/vehemens (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 11:53:58 -0800) * | In general when upgrading, you take your chances. If a port upgrade | fails, you should fall back to what worked. So, a *fundamental* (practically an OS component) port is brought in -- and it disables my system. What is my way of

Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade

2009-01-31 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/vehemens (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:54:42 -0800) * | On Saturday 31 January 2009 01:25:21 pm Alex Goncharov wrote: | So, a *fundamental* (practically an OS component) port is brought in | -- and it disables my system. What is my way of action? Right -- | install the old packages, taken

Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade

2009-01-31 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/bf2006a (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:43:59 -0800 (PST)) * | Alex: | | I can understand your frustration. The Xorg update, although it | helps a lot of people, is inevitably going to cause problems for | some, because it is run by so many people in different ways with a | wide variety of

Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade

2009-01-30 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Peter (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:53:11 +1100) * | X11 is a critical component for anyone who is using FreeBSD as a | desktop and having upgrades fail or come with significant POLA | violations and regressions for significant numbers of people is not | acceptable. Fully agree with this. |

Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension Generic Event Extension missing on display :0.0.

2009-01-30 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/O. (Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:19:41 +0100) * | After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4 | and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now | firefox3 still doesn't work properly and hits me when starting with this | error message: | |

Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade

2009-01-29 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Bruce (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:06:45 +) * | One theory is that somehow the mouse driver ioctls which are passed | to ums, are somehow hosing USB, although why that would be, I don't | understand. ums currently doesn't have driver instrumentation in that path. | | I pulled a

Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade

2009-01-29 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Robert (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:40:11 -0500) * | I've had patches available for probably a couple of months now posted to | freebsd-...@. For the few people who tested it, I had no real issues | reported. We were stalled for a long time, While X kept moving, so the | amount of change

Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade

2009-01-29 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Robert (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:12:47 -0500) * | Problem is, it isn't just the Xserver... All of the pieces are | intertwined and so in many cases to update Xserver you also need to | update some/several libraries as well as all of your drivers. Xorg is | about 60 or 70 ports now. That

Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade

2009-01-28 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Dan (Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:39:10 -0700) * | While this enabled the mouse (without HAL), it did nothing good about: | | a. The bogus keyboard scans. You are quoting me and I need to clarify... | Everyone is talking about an xorg.conf | The new X.org 7.4 upgrade hit me too: no

Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade

2009-01-27 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Diego (Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:50:11 +0100) * | On my -current I get some weirdness with latest xorg, latest hal... Take a look at the issue ports/131016: xorg-7.4 renders system unusable! in the bug system re: other people's unfortunate experiences with this upgrade. My personal

Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade

2009-01-27 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Kent (Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:38:47 -0800) * | I had 3 system with this problem and they started to work after I added | (Options AutoAddDevices off) to the ServerLayout section. I did have the `Options AutoAddDevices false' piece, and the two other required disregard HAL options in the

An upgrade to xorg-server-1.5.3_1,1/libxcb-1.1.93

2009-01-25 Thread Alex Goncharov
I upgraded my X Window system today, with these instructions in mind: # /usr/ports/UPDATING 20090124: sysutils/hal has been updated and should now properly detect mice for use in Xorg. Use of AllowEmptyInput should no longer be needed for most users and moused should now work

Re: Is postgresql83-server broken?

2008-09-01 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Ivan (Mon, 01 Sep 2008 11:29:39 +0200) * | Can someone else confirm this? Do your postgresql83-server ports build? Builds for me: $ make cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wdeclaration-after-statement

Re: Is postgresql83-server broken? (update: ICU and autotools problems?)

2008-09-01 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Ivan (Mon, 1 Sep 2008 13:45:32 +0200) * | After I fix this manually with make makesum, there's another problem: Did you try this simple fix instead: diff Makefile~ Makefile 110c110 PATCHFILES+= pg-833-icu-xx-2008-06-11.diff.gz:icu --- PATCHFILES+=

Re: Is postgresql83-server broken? (update: ICU and autotools problems?)

2008-09-01 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Palle (Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:05:40 +0200) * | Yeah, that's what I failed to commit last week, but did commit right now. | It is all that is needed. Ahem, while you are it, would you be able to take a look at the unassigned PR postgresql-odbc and perhaps expedite my patch commit? ---

Re: Portmaster questions (Was: Re: Using Portupgrade?)

2008-08-04 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- Doug Barton (Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:14:54 -0700) * | It's really not appropriate to hijack the portupgrade thread for this, | so I'm starting a new subject. Also, please respect followups to | -ports. [ Being an inexperienced poster: sorry. Am I using a good cc: list now? ] | Alex

Re: cmucl and sbcl keep crashing on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-04-21 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Xuebin (Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:50:02 +0800) * | | To whom may concern: | | I check port tree and know that this address is maintainer mailbox for sbcl | port. I've sent similar mail to cmucl maintainer but had no reply | yet. If you look at the CMUCL version in ports, you will find it

(Very) bogus package dependencies

2007-12-06 Thread Alex Goncharov
There has been a point recently made on a `freebsd-' list about unnecessary dependencies of the `xorg-server' package, it being dependent on `gnome' and `hal', for example. That's a valid point and I am with those who don't want this dependency to exist -- but at least this dependency can be