Re: Portsnap restoration after Git migration

On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:02:41 -0400 Ed Maste wrote: > Colin (cperciva) and I are making good progress on the portsnap build > infrastructure Git migration. I'll follow up when it is back in > operation. Thank you! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing

Re: No update for a day on ports?

On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 19:47:01 +1100 Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > Would appreciate if anyone can provide insight as to the 4 git > commands that I need to function, in a manner similar to the way I > use svnlite use. Git equivalents for: > > svnlite update /usr/ports > svnlite update -r

Re: Proposed ports git transition schedule

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 15:20:33 +0100 Felix Palmen wrote: > * Bob Eager [20210327 14:14]: > > I looked for gitup, and it's moved to py37-git-up (unless something > > replaced it, but nothing in devel/). > > That's an entire

Re: Proposed ports git transition schedule

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 00:19:55 +0100 Felix Palmen wrote: > > With portsnap, I don't need a URL. It's built in. And that would be > > nice. > > Ever had a look in /etc/portsnap.conf? Although it only wants a server > name (well, much of a

Re: Proposed ports git transition schedule

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:30:03 +0100 Felix Palmen wrote: > * Bob Eager [20210326 14:27]: > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:04:17 +0100 > > Felix Palmen wrote: > > > I never used portsnap, but I'd assume net/gitup should serv

Re: Python 2.7 removal outline

On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:55:15 -0500 Greg Rivers via freebsd-ports wrote: > On Friday, 26 March 2021 14:19:20 CDT Dan Mahoney (Ports) wrote: > > More thoughts on mailman, specifically: > > > > So, I just went to find an old FB post I made about mailman 2.x: > > > > === > > From the "Load Bearing

Re: Python 2.7 removal outline

On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:06:08 -0700 Chris wrote: > > I doubt that meaning of overlay is going to be relevant. I'd not > > heard of it either, but from looking in ports/Mk/ it seems to be a > > way of modifying port builds. > As I understand it. It allows you to graft out-of-tree ports/versions

Re: Proposed ports git transition schedule

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:04:17 +0100 Felix Palmen wrote: > * Bob Eager [20210326 09:22]: > > Thanks for this. The documentation (although introductory) is quite > > detailed. What would be useful is just to note down the exact

Re: Proposed ports git transition schedule

On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 21:56:03 -0400 Ed Maste wrote: > When the conversion is complete, Subversion will become read-only with > no further updates to the ports tree. If you are fetching ports using > svn, you will need to switch to the new git repository at the > following URLS: > > Web

Re: Python 2.7 removal outline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:03:47 + Rene Ladan wrote: > - - mail/mailman is being replaced by clusteradm@ with mlmmj. You > can use `pkg lock` to stick with it after removal, if there is no > other way. Is anyone working on a mailman 3 port?

Re: broken vuln.xml?

On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 07:56:16 -0500 Robert Huff wrote: > Hello: > This appears to have broken (Sunday?) on one of my systems. > What is the correct way to download/regenerate this file? portaudit is being replaced by pkg audit. This may already have happened - I am not sure.

Using gcc as a build dependency only

I have a port that, for reasons I won't go into, I build with gcc. It all works fine with USE_GCC= yes - no problem. The issue is that it's a build dependency and a run dependency. So anyone wanting to use it has to install gcc, and is discouraged because (a) it's big and (b) it drags in other

Re: Patch compiler warnings away?

On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 23:11:49 +0200 Moritz Schmitt wrote: > What's the recommended approach? Just ignore the warnings and don't > modify the software since it builds anyway? Or create patches even > though they don't seem to be strictly necessary? I tend to patch them away, as if they don't fix

Re: pkg-fallout: duplicate symbols?

On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 15:58:15 +0100 Bob Eager wrote: > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:44:36 - (UTC) > Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > On 2020-08-22, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > > > It can be worked around by adding -fcommon to the compilation > > > flags,

Re: pkg-fallout: duplicate symbols?

On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:44:36 - (UTC) Christian Weisgerber wrote: > On 2020-08-22, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > It can be worked around by adding -fcommon to the compilation > > flags, but in most cases it should not be too difficult to get rid > > of the multiply defined symbols. > >

Re: pkg-fallout on one of the ports I maintain

Almost certainly the -fno-common problem with clang 11. This now defaults to -fno-common, which causes multiply defined symbols at link time if something is declared global in more than one module (instead of extern in all but one module). There is a similar problem with gcc. Declaring

Re: [package - head-i386-default][astro/opencpn] Failed for opencpn-5.0.0_1 in build

On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:42:11 +0200 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Should I consider the following or just trash it, given the warning? > !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1300113, Host: 1300100) !!! > !!! This is not supported. !!! > !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! > !!!

Re: pkg-fallout: duplicate symbols?

On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 14:05:27 - (UTC) Christian Weisgerber wrote: > I'm currently receiving pkg-fallout mail that some of the ports I > maintain are failing to build with "duplicate symbol" errors. > > It is unclear to me whether these are actual problems I need to > take care of, or just

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 13:32:10 +0200 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 12:59:18PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On 2020-08-04 20:43, Steve Wills wrote: > > > > > > We are planning to deprecate use of portsnap in ports. > > >

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

On Tue, 04 Aug 2020 19:03:08 -0700 Chris wrote: > Please tell me that this doesn't mean a > > [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of subversion > > is on the horizon. I'm afraid that git is fashionable now. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: New ports...

On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:54:16 +0200 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > OK, thanks for the advice. Here are two of mine, submitted a little > > while ago, but still with 'new' status. > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246237 > > > >

Re: New ports...

On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:11:52 +0200 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > I've submitted a couple of new ports (to bugs.freebsd.org and I'm > > curious if one is supposed to do something else after doing that? > > In general: no. It's helpful to mention those ports here on the list, > because ports

Re: jitsi documentation

Sorry, finger trouble, didn't mean to send it again! While I'm here, let's make this message useful. I have added downloads of files/file fragments that are needed. On Sat, 30 May 2020 14:00:01 +0100 Bob Eager wrote: > First, thanks to all who worked on this port. I looked at this a wh

jitsi documentation

First, thanks to all who worked on this port. I looked at this a while ago and was totally confused by it all! I have installed jitsi in a FreeBSD jail and it works very nicely. I wrote down what I did so that I could do it again in rather less time. Then I got a bit carried away. What resulted

jitsi documentation

First, thanks to all who worked on this port. I looked at this a while ago and was totally confused by it all! I have installed jitsi in a FreeBSD jail and it works very nicely. I wrote down what I did so that I could do it again in rather less time. Then I got a bit carried away. What resulted

New port: simh-hpdoc (PR 244395)

Hi! I hate to bug people about this sort of thing, as I know there is always a big queue. I submitted this PR a few weeks ago. It's simply a documentation package so shouldn't take long. It's a dependency for two other ports that I am waiting to submit (see the PR). I don't really want to

Re: smartmontools and update-smart-drivedb

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:17:55 +0200 Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > ## Carmel NY (carmel...@outlook.com): > > > 1) Why is the "update" procedure deliberately removed from the > > port? > > The svn history does mention it: > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision=527607 > "Remove

Re: smartmontools and update-smart-drivedb

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:43:40 -0400 Carmel NY wrote: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 13:52:04 +0100, Bob Eager stated: > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >Hash: SHA256 > > > >On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:30:31 -0400 > >Carmel NY wrote: > > > >> FreeBSD

Re: smartmontools and update-smart-drivedb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:30:31 -0400 Carmel NY wrote: > FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p8 > > Output of smartctl -V > > smartctl 7.1 2019-12-30 r5022 [FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p7 amd64] (local > build) Copyright (C) 2002-19, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, >

Re: python 2.7 marked as deprecated and EOL while 2.7.18 RC is available

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 09:34:39 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote: > There are very few things still in the ports that use python and that > only work with python-2.7. So, yes, everything can be upgraded to > python-3. Whether that works entirely smoothly

Re: fetch is tarpitted by Texas Instruments and/or Akamai and can not download distfiles for TI-related ports.

On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 00:31:51 +0200 Vidar Karlsen wrote: > > On 2 Apr 2020, at 20:22, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > > > You could try it yourself: > > > > http://software-dl.ti.com/msp430/msp430_public_sw/mcu/msp430/MSPGCC/8_3_2_2/export/msp430-gcc-support-files-1.209.zip > > > >

Re: reccomendations of conference / party audio video software ?

On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 22:53:12 +0100 Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 5:08 PM Julian H. Stacey > wrote: > > > > What about client apps on android, apple & MS > > ('cos most friends are non tech & dont run BSD or Linux PCs etc) > > > IMHO, anything that requires _users_ of a

Re: reccomendations of conference / party audio video software ?

People have been saying good things about jitsi (Java based) bu the port didn't work on a quick try (my ports tree isn't very new though and there was no time to update it). On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 17:06:56 +0100 "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > Hi ports@ > Any reccomendations of conference / social

Re: pkg: how to retrieve the messages ports emit after install?

On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 07:18:40 -0700 Chris wrote: > > > OK I'm a by ports make install as a rule. But I needed to > > > spin up a box quickly, and decided to use pkg(8). xorg, > > > and another port (package) I installed, dumped some > > > important information after the install. I stripped the >

Re: pkg: how to retrieve the messages ports emit after install?

On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 23:28:49 -0700 Chris wrote: > OK I'm a by ports make install as a rule. But I needed to > spin up a box quickly, and decided to use pkg(8). xorg, > and another port (package) I installed, dumped some > important information after the install. I stripped the > text from the

Re: When to use TMPPLIST instead of pkg-plist?

On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:29:18 -0800 Chris wrote: > TMPPLIST is an artifact of the QA process when making a port. It is > used for comparison to what you, as a port maintainer claim is the > pkg-plist, and whats found that looks as the actual plist. When a > discrepancy occurs. You're warned, and

Re: When to use TMPPLIST instead of pkg-plist?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 00:15:33 +0100 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:06:19PM +0100, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote: > > Hello ports@, > > > > recently I saw TMPPLIST being used for a relatively simple fonts > > port instead of

Re: package +MANIFEST file - look inside

On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:04:42 + (UTC) Yuet-nan Wong via freebsd-ports wrote: > Is there a command, or short script that enables the +MANIFEST to be > examined.  There are cases where we want to review what the scripts > section of the +MANIFEST contains.  In particular the post-install >

Re: Creating meta and packagesite

On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 09:09:29 -0600 D'Arcy Cain wrote: > First of all, I know the answer is "poudrire" but I have been > struggling with that and it seems like overkill for what I need. I > already have my own system for building the ports that I want and I > have set up a web server to serve

Re: Creation of a diff of a new port

On Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:16:13 + Kralj Karlo wrote: > Jonathan Chen writes: > > Details can be found at: > > > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html > > > > I can create a shar (example 3.2), but the handbook suggests to me > that I should be

Re: unable to fetch file for www/linux-flashplayer (head)

On Sun, 16 Jun 2019 20:24:27 +0200 Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día domingo, junio 16, 2019 a las 07:10:54p. m. +0100, Bob Eager > escribió: > > > I expect it will be fixed soon. Meanwhile, I have temporarily put my > > copy at: > > > > http://www.ancientgeek

Re: unable to fetch file for www/linux-flashplayer (head)

I expect it will be fixed soon. Meanwhile, I have temporarily put my copy at: http://www.ancientgeek.org.uk/distfiles/ under the same name. Hope this helps. On Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:34:33 +0200 Matthias Apitz wrote: > Hello, > > I'm unable to fetch the distfile for the port: > > # make

Re: Cleaning up pkg-message

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 12:52:41 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 08/06/2019 19:29, Bob Eager wrote: > > The committer folded the README file into pkg-message, and I > > disagree with this: > > > 2) It meant that an

Re: Cleaning up pkg-message

On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 12:16:05 -0600 Adam Weinberger wrote: > I want to get some stakeholder input on our pkg-message files. I think > we need to have a clear policy about what does and doesn't belong in > them, and I'd like to get your input. I agree. I recently noticed that one of my ports had

Re: postfix and postfix-current

On Sat, 20 Apr 2019 04:39:59 -0600 "@lbutlr" wrote: > I see today that > > ===>>> postfix-current-3.4.20190106,5 > ===>>> New version available: postfix-current-3.5.20190330,5 > > What is the proper way to move from postfix-current-3.4.20190106,5 to > postfix-3.4.5 (mail/postfix)? > >

Re: How to use @preexec to test for installed packages

On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 15:58:48 +0200 Matthias Fechner wrote: > Dear all, > > as pkg cannot handle CONFLICTS_INSTALL I tried now to implement this > as a preinstall command using @preexec in pkg-plist. > > The command should check if a package is installed and stop the > installation or continue

Re: How to alert committer?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:21:43 +0100 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:08:01AM +0000, Bob Eager wrote: > > I have a PR on one of my ports, and I agree with the patch provided. > > > > I'm not sure how to si

How to alert committer?

I have a PR on one of my ports, and I agree with the patch provided. I'm not sure how to signal to have the port committed. I can obviously ask here (and am now doing so) but is there an automated way of doing that please? Port: math/rexx-regmath PR: 235512 This is a fix to the Makefile to

Re: options DOCS + EXAMPLES

On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 11:33:11 +0100 Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: > Am 02.11.2018 um 11:24 schrieb Mathieu Arnold: > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 10:49:52AM +0100, Harry Schmalzbauer > > wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> found out that the need to define DOCS and EXAMPLES in > >> OPTIONS_DEFINE was made

Re: workflow question: how do you maintain the port in sync with upstream?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 17:33:38 +0200 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:41:43PM +0800, blubee blubeeme wrote: > > This one is fairly straight forward, you can simply replace that > > string with a regex command; > > This is an

Re: Delete a port

On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 10:42:36 -0700 Eitan Adler wrote: > On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 at 08:13, Chris Rees wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > On 4 August 2018 15:15:23 BST, Eugene Grosbein > > wrote: > > >04.08.2018 21:03, Romain Tartière wrote: > > > > > >> On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 12:28:41PM +0200, Matthias

Re: how to make ports not install xorg or dependencies

On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:41:17 +0100 tech-lists wrote: > Hello, > > context: freebsd-12 r336215 arm64 > > I don't want xorg or X11 or any of its components installed on this > system. I install ports in the traditional way, in other words cd > port && make config && make install. Any ports that

Re: Any way to prevent do-extract chmod and chown?

On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 19:06:44 -0400 Joseph Ward wrote: > When I "make extract", the "do-extract" target is performing a chmod > and chown on everything, as seen from the following excerpt from the > bsd.port.mk file: . . . > Short of commenting those lines out (which I really don't want to

Re: make package "*** Error code 1"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 05:58:01 -0400 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 07/06/2018 21:17, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > 08.06.2018 8:12, duckmanjbr wrote: > > > >> do-install: > >>${MKDIR} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/pkg > >>${MKDIR}

Re: Pause pkg install messages

On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:08:17 +0100 Johannes Lundberg wrote: > In addition to that it would be nice (if it's not already done) to > store this information in a log file somewhere so that one can > revisit and see what needs to be manually configured for each > installed

Re: All those notes...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 09:39:56 +1100 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Monday, 8 January 2018 at 8:48:04 +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > > I'm not quite sure what happened since my last weekly "pkg update" > > etc but it sure got

Re: can't link against math.h

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:05:00 +0800 blubee blubeeme wrote: > I wrote a simple test program to test and see if math.h has the > function: exp10f > > #include > > int main(int argc, char** argv) > { > (void)argv; > return ((int*)())[argc]; > } > > tried compiling it with

Re: Can someone please look at PR 221573 ?

Point taken. I was trying to keep it short to save people's time - or so I thought. I will do better next time! On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 20:16:21 -0700 Kevin Oberman <rkober...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Bob Eager <r...@tavi.co.uk> wrote: > > > It

Can someone please look at PR 221573 ?

It's just coming up to two months, so I thought it might be time to point it out! I know it's a new port, so probably lower priority, but if anyone has time, it would be appreciated. Thanks ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: standard locations for port files

On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 15:54:09 -0400 wrote: > [Default] On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:53:27 -0500, Adam Vande More > wrote: > > >On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:41 PM, wrote: > > > >> Why wouldn't logs be in /usr/local/var/...? Given

Re: gnucash conflicts with guile?

It compiled OK for me! Looks OK - but I also installed gnucash-docs, and I get a blank window when I try to use help. On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:38:03 +0200 Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > Now it tested it. I try to compite it with guile2 opton. Result: > > gmake[6]: ***

gnucash conflicts with guile?

I have just tried to build gnucash, but it seems to have a conflict with guile, of all things: gmake[5]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/lang/guile/work/guile-1.8.8' gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/lang/guile/work/guile-1.8.8' gmake[3]: Leaving directory

Re: How to get pkg to recognize local repository?

On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 02:33:22 + "Thomas Mueller" wrote: > I suppose priority 99 would take priority over priority 98? > > In normal English usage, first priority or priority one is higher > than priority two. > > Do you need the comma after the closing brace after

Re: Easytag crashes with SIGABRT - stack overflow

Sorry, I always leave something out! i386 On Sat, 24 Jun 2017 22:54:56 +0100 Steven Hartland <kill...@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: > amd64 or i386? > > On 24/06/2017 22:15, Bob Eager wrote: > > Before I submit an actual bug report, I wanted advice as to whether > >

Easytag crashes with SIGABRT - stack overflow

Before I submit an actual bug report, I wanted advice as to whether I'm doing something silly! I've been using Easytag for about 3 years now. All has been fine. I recently upgraded from 10.3-RELEASE to 11.0-STABLE. I also updated the ports (built locally). Easytag now crashes as soon as I try

lxsession/consolekit problem

I've been struggling with this for a few days, so in desperation I'm asking! I've installed FreeBSD-11-STABLE. Latest ports tree (as of a few days ago). I have installed xorg and LXDE. My .xinitrc contains just: exec startlxde When I use startx, the screen turns graphical, and I get a dialog

Re: portsnap temporary files

On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 10:34:39 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: > (Many responses) > > I note that no-one has answered the question which caused me to post > the message in the first place viz: why weren't the files being > removed automatically? Everyone appears to have missed

Re: portsnap temporary files

On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 06:51:44 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: > Is there some reason why portsnap cannot clean > up /var/db/portsnap/files? I've just had to remove a zillion of them, > a bunch at a time because "rm" choked on the arg list. > > Perhaps a "portsnap clean"

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:43:32 +1100 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Saturday, 17 December 2016 at 20:16:12 -0600, John Marino wrote: > > On 12/17/2016 19:35, Peter Jeremy wrote: > >> $ cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/synth/ && make >

emulators/simh failing to build; PR waiting

I took over maintainership of this port a little while ago. I generated some minor fixes, but it wasn't worth uploading them. About three weeks ago I started getting emails from pkg-fallout about build failures on i386 and amd64. This is only happening on CURRENT so far. I have incorporated the

Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted)

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:32:55 +0200 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > I think unless FreeBSD makes explicit antichrist statement, there is > > no problem having a daemon mascot. I have never heard any religious > > problem so far. Or then I missed something. > > Approx. 20 years

Re: LICENSE questions

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:15:28 +0200 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 04/10/2016 à 14:03, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit : > > On 10/04/2016 06:47 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> Le 04/10/2016 à 09:29, Eitan Adler a écrit : > >>> On 4 October 2016 at 00:25, Mathieu Arnold

Re: LICENSE questions

On Sun, 2 Oct 2016 18:44:43 + "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" wrote: > So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which > have licenses I can't find in Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk. How do I set > LICENSE in those ports? Like this example: LICENSE=

Re: Bug 212597 - New port: editors/ecce Edinburgh Compatible Context Editor - stuck?

On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 02:40:54 +0200 "Carlos J. Puga Medina" wrote: > Hi Bob, > > The new port is ready to go, but I need my mentor's approval or > authorization to commit it into the ports tree. One of my mentors will > take a look ASAP, so I hope you understand. > > Best

Bug 212597 - New port: editors/ecce Edinburgh Compatible Context Editor - stuck?

Hi I don't want to be a nuisance, but...! I submitted this new port just over two weeks ago. Someone made some minor cosmetic changes to the Makefile, and I approved them. Nothing has happened for nearly two weeks. I don't know if there are special procedures for new ports, but as far as I can

LICENSE documentation

I recently had a minor patch (to one of the ports I maintain) bounced because I hadn't specified a LICENSE. This port never did have LICENSE, and it had been updated recently with no issues. However, I was told that "I don't see any mention of any kind of license in the package or on the site, so

Re: ${INSTALL_DATA} problems

On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 13:32:30 +1000 Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/plist-keywords.html > > > I've just tried this but ran into some difficulty. Specifically I > have a plist which is many hundreds of lines long. There

Re: Makefile LICENSE options

On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 03:39:51 -0400 Randy Westlund wrote: > Is there a list of possible values for LICENSE in port makefiles? I > can't find anything in the Porter's Handbook. > > I'm expecting to find a table that shows how each license should be > written, e.g. use

Re: requesting help with Variable OSREL in port Makefile

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 18:28:23 -0400 qjail1 wrote: > >> .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100 > >> IGNORE= builds only on 10 or greater than 10 > >> .endif > > > > That's OSVERSION. The OP asked about OSREL. > > > > (however, OSVERSION is more useful as

Re: requesting hep with Variable OSREL in port Makefile

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 22:12:31 +0200 Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100 > IGNORE= builds only on 10 or greater than 10 > .endif That's OSVERSION. The OP asked about OSREL. (however, OSVERSION is more useful as one can test

Re: Download all source before compiling the port

On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:19:22 -0700 David Wolfskill wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:15:04PM -0300, Rafael Rodrigues Nakano > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Is there a way to download everything required by a port before > > starting to build it and its dependencies (so I can

Re: old ports/packages

On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:17:57 +0200 Franco Fichtner wrote: > The initial release was 10.0, which was phased out after a > year, leaving us no choice but to go 10.1 just two months > after our initial release in order to receive official security > updates. Worst case it

Please commit this long overdue update to sysutils/fcron

(my fault it's overdue, not the ports team!) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209139 Thanks -- Bob ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: head / poudriere && devel/llvm37 Killing timed out build after 86400 seconds

I was forced to build llvm37 without documentation. It worked then. On Tue, 03 May 2016 10:48:52 +0200 Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I started my poudriere on amd64 to build "my" 1800 ports from SVN > > head (r414411 as of 1st of May).

Reviving deleted port

This relates to ftp/rexx-curl. This was deleted after failing to build with the latest version of curl. I didn't notice for a while (I was going through a period when I couldn't update my ports tree). It is no longer in the ports tree at all. The problem turned out to be just an uninitialised

Best way to submit a port upgrade

Background: I have created various ports, but I have never upgraded one to a new version (i.e. from a new distfile) before. I now have an upgrade to a new version of the port. I have: - Updated Makefile - Updated pkg-plist - Updated distinfo - New files in files/ - New patches in files/ I am

Re: Mailman in a jail

On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:02:05 -0400 Michael Jung wrote: > On 2016-04-21 14:10, Jim Ohlstein wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On 4/21/16 1:31 PM, Alphons van Werven wrote: > >> Jim Ohlstein wrote: > >> > >>> Mailman logs show connection errors. > >> > >> I don't know exactly how

Re: category customports

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:18:11 +0100 Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > Thanks -> echo 'VALID_CATEGORIES=local' >> /etc/make.conf is he > simpelst way. Seems to work. Don't you mean: VALID_CATEGORIES+=local ?? ___

Re: category customports

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:21:11 +0100 Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > If I make an own port, I had it add to the category/Makefile. But this > could be overwritten with the next update. I make my own category - 'local'. > If I make an own category I had it add to

Re: Building Latest links etc.

On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:04:02 +0200 Marko Cupać marko.cu...@mimar.rs wrote: If you need to maintain custom packages for more than 5 systems then poudriere is the way to go: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-poudriere.html I have also written 'works for me' detailed howto (in Sebian

Re: Building Latest links etc.

On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:48:39 +0200 Patrick Hess patrickh...@gmx.net wrote: Bob Eager wrote: I now want to update the ports. I see how to do this using portmaster, and how to generate packages on the package server. But...how do I use portmaster on the 'slave' machines, using

Re: Building Latest links etc.

On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:11:55 +0100 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: You don't need to use portmaster on the slave machines. Just create a repository from the packages you've built on your primary machine -- which is basically done by runnig 'pkg repo' in the directory

Building Latest links etc.

This is the scenario. I build all packages locally (a number have special configs). This is done on one machine, which is then the repository for 'pkg install'. So far so good. I now want to update the ports. I see how to do this using portmaster, and how to generate packages on the package

Error building net/asterisk

I've previously built this port (as version 1.8.18.0) with no problems under 9.1. I'm now upgrading to 10.1 and tried to rebuild (with an updated ports tree from about four days ago, so using 1.8.32_3 now). A couple of files fail to link - main/asterisk.c and main/pbx.c. They are wanting

Resurrecting a deleted port

I have been using ftp/rexx-curl for some years. I hadn't updated my ports tree for a while, and when I did I saw that this port was marked as BROKEN. At the time I didn't have enough time to take a closer look. I looked at it again recently and it's been deleted; fair enough, broken and no

Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:34:19 GMT lini...@freebsd.org wrote: portname: lang/rexx-regutil description:Implementation of IBM's RexxUtil function library for Regina maintainer: b...@eager.cx deprecated because: Not staged. See

Re: Done with this port

On Wed, 21 May 2014 14:58:32 -0700 Patrick Powell papow...@astart.com wrote: Mathias, I think that brief description of how you did this would be VERY useful to some of us looking at this problem and not knowing where to start. Perhaps an: 'this is the way it was' and a 'this is the way

Re: editors/uemacs

I'm a bit busy, but if no one else comes forward, let me know. On Mon, 12 May 2014 10:13:46 +1000 andrew clarke m...@ozzmosis.com wrote: On Sat 2014-05-10 10:33:52 UTC-0500, Bryan Drewery (bdrew...@freebsd.org) wrote: On June 31st, all unstaged ports will be marked DEPRECATED and have

Re: Why does Samba requires 777 permissions on /tmp

: warning: Insecure world writable dir /tmp/ in PATH, mode 041777 /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools/pkgtools.rb:483: warning: Insecure world writable dir /tmp/ in PATH, mode 041777 On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Simon Wright simon.wri...@gmx.net wrote: On 20/05/2013 15:38, Bob

Re: Why does Samba requires 777 permissions on /tmp

On Mon, 20 May 2013 08:03:09 -0500 sindrome sindr...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like a step in the right direction. How do I troubleshoot to figure out what application is appending/changing the value of PATH? Nothing is. As far as I can see. What I think is happening is that portupgrade is

  1   2   >