e patches in ports/168262 and
> ports/168263
I'm still involved. I'll try to deal with the updates tomorrow, sorry
for the delay.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
his is a bad idea, so I've copied in flz, the de-facto
> pkg_install maintainer
>
> but don't forget that pkg_install is very close to death!
Aye. I've just handed my src commit bit for safekeeping but if you're
willing to put in the work, the plan sounds good
uld be sortable already, just click on the column name.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
lp people to create ports that fetch sources from
svn directly, and replacing a BUILD_DEPENDS line with a USE_SVN= perl
doesn't sound that useful to me.
A script that fetches sources, creates a tarball and all that could be
a nice addition to Tools/scripts though.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...
p as well.
>
> Is there a new link for the new results? Or did you use the link above?
I'll start a new run and will report the results in a day or two.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FAIK it's not recorded anywhere
else.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> Quoting Mark Linimon (from Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:21:26
> -0500):
>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:37:53PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
>>>
>>> Flz@ just ran an exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can
>>> be
>>> seen here:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:22 PM, RW wrote:
> On Sat, 28 May 2011 13:00:41 +0200
> Gour-Gadadhara Dasa wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 28 May 2011 11:23:32 +0100
>> Florent Thoumie wrote:
>>
>> > You can rebuild the port with WITH_PYTHON=yes.
>>
>> Thank yo
g language, syntax high.
> works.)
You can rebuild the port with WITH_PYTHON=yes.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Sergey V. Dyatko
wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011 13:13:51 +0100
> Florent Thoumie wrote:
>
>>
>> This is committed now. I've updated net-p2p/libtorrent-devel and
>> net-p2p/rtorrent-devel as opposed to the non-devel ports as it is
s is committed now. I've updated net-p2p/libtorrent-devel and
net-p2p/rtorrent-devel as opposed to the non-devel ports as it is
considered unstable.
I haven't been able to reproduce the issue with 0.8.8/0.12.8. I reckon
it had to do with the kqueue backend.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebs
f you feel a PR is OBE, then just follow-up to tell us why and we'll
close it if we agree.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To u
ooks like long standing
>> issue
>>
>
> There is a patch working here for me :
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/155318
Sorry it took me a while, but I've finally committed this patch.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
why was the change made, what are its benefits, and how can we fix this
> problem? :)
I'm sure there was a good reason at the time. I'll have a better look later.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@free
is looking
> at /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs for information on installing a
> port package, even-though all of the information required for an
> installation appears to be in my port package.
>
> Has anyone run into this issue? Any assumptions I am making? Any flawed
>
[1]).
This needs support in both ports and pkg_install.
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-ports@freebsd.org/msg27486.html
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
> already proposed something else ?
>
> I apologize for my bad english.
This was discussed in the following bug-report:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=108514
I think the proper solution is to create a +UGIDS file to be able to
maintain a refcount, but the status quo isn
've just committed the two patches.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> Quoting Florent Thoumie (from Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:10:54
> +):
>
>> I mentioned getting rid of those pesky @*exec lines a few years ago,
>> but this was met by quite a lot of objection.
>>
>>
ort (users/groups
creation comes to mind).
- Scripts should be automatically picked up as you mentioned. We're
trying to shove most targets in pkg-install, but it probably would be
best to split it (preinstall, postinstall, predeinstall,
postdeinstall). Good thing is, this doesn't require any
ocal/ports/freebsd-mips.shar
The thing is, it will have to be modified everytime a header is
added/removed. The easy way out is to only support HEAD so you don't
have to use OSVERSION conditionals. The other solution I'm seeing is
to fetch sources from FTP (which is obviously more work).
is a more suggested, or conventional, way of
> doing this operation.
Would you mind putting the files somewhere and showing us the error
log? I am aware of one caveat at the moment, which is that you can't
use users/groups created with USERS/GROUPS in pkg-plist. Every typical
use case with
regardless. Also,
quite a lot of tools do make a package backup before deinstalling, so
I don't see this as a major issue. If people don't like the I/O
overhead, we could use pkg_add in slave mode, it will skip the package
building phase.
> This patch is not yet complete, it should wo
FYI.
Use as follows:
USERS= foo
GROUPS= foo
... where foo is the user/group from UIDs and GIDs.
Simplez!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Florent Thoumie
Date: Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 10:18 PM
Subject: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk ports/audio/pulseaudio Makefile
pkg-install ports
t as somebody else said, the py25- prefix in that case comes from
your installed version of python.
Check entry 20090608 about the python upgrade in /usr/ports/UPDATING.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebs
tion is needed for that).
>
>> I do not think that this is either obvious/intuitive or even correct.
>> At the very list there should be an option to control this behavior.
>>
>> I have a system where I keep package files for all installed/built
>> packages and pkg_i
> Gecko Team is working on a nativ port :-)
> True - but we also have linux versions of Firefox and Thunderbird ;)
> Plus we still should have some documentation on making a linux-* port.
The only reason for that is to be able to use linux plugins AFAIK. I'
/bsd.xorg.mk 2009-05-26 13:42:58.0 +0100
@@ -28,6 +28,11 @@
# xserver - there's only one atm, I guess everything can fit into the
port itself
.if defined(XORG_CAT)
+
+. if defined(WITHOUT_X11)
+IGNORE=me not want x11
+. endif
+
# Default variables, common to
27;s 500kg friends. but i can not seem to find it.
>>
>> i do cvsup-without-gui, emacs-nox11, etc. but one mistake with some
>> port, and you get the whole boatload, and you can never scrape it all
>> out.
>
> I think you're looking for WITHOUT_X11=yes :)
I would
2009/3/2 Eygene Ryabinkin :
> Florent, good day.
>
> Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:03:38AM +, Florent Thoumie wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Eygene Ryabinkin
>> wrote:
>> > Could you or someone else add ports/129881 as the ARPv2 changes
>> >
o can't do it for myself.
Isn't this PR ready for commit already? It seems that the only thing
blocking it is maintainer approval, but we're well beyond that now.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@f
11 21757 0
Fax +49 (0)911 21757 1
http://www.qs-housing.net
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &quo
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Florent Thoumie
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 3:49 AM
> To: Schmehl, Paul L
> Cc: freebsd
good bye,
In principle yes. Now you do have to understand that this is a lot of
boring work and you'll need approval from portmgr@, not just me.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
it and don't want to be
> confused and be quietly dragged into Gnomedom.
>
> The use of USE_ make file variable should conform to what bsd.port.mk
> says, IMHO.
>
> | pkgconfig could be extracted from the USE_GNOME stuff, and it could
> | even
uick look shows
that your port is interactive, and not marked as such in Makefile. If
you choose to go with solution #1, then you'll have to set
IS_INTERACTIVE=yes (unless I'm wrong of course).
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Florent Thoumie (f...@xbsd.org) wrote:
>
>> > You are lucky guys you have not lived in USSR. otherwise you'd surely like
>> > alternative ways :)
>>
>> In soviet russia, alternative ways like
t;>> work that you have put in, and for your efforts to find and solve
>>> any remaining problems.
>>
>> Hear, hear.
>
> I definitely third that. Thanks guys for all the hard work and beers are on
> me if you come down to South Bay area :).
> -Garrett
Tell
z
> x11-toolkits/gtk20
> palm/jpilot
> x11-toolkits/libbonoboui
> devel/libnotify
> graphics/librsvg2
> math/octave
> x11-toolkits/pango
> net-im/pidgin
> sysutils/policykit-gnome
> multimedia/transcode
> net/wireshark
> multimedia/vlc
Did
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> Florent Thoumie wrote:
>> It's not about installing files but rather registering them.
>> PLIST_FILES/PLIST_DIRS is just a way to replace pkg-plist, for wrong
>> reasons.
>
> I respectfully disagree my friend
FYI. Report problems on freebsd-...@.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Florent Thoumie
Date: Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:30 PM
Subject: [review] cvs commit: ports MOVED ports/Mk bsd.gecko.mk
bsd.port.mk bsd.xorg.mk ports/astro/boinc-setiathome-enhanced Makefile
ports/astro/celestia
se, PLIST_FILES looks
> like it will work to me...
It's not about installing files but rather registering them.
PLIST_FILES/PLIST_DIRS is just a way to replace pkg-plist, for wrong
reasons.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
_
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:58:02 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:47:38 -0600, Florent Thoumie wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Dmitry Marakasov
>> >
>> > wrote:
&g
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Florent Thoumie (f...@xbsd.org) wrote:
>
>> > If it's just a single file, the preferred way is to add
>> >
>> > PLIST_FILES=bin/program_name
>> >
>> > to the Makefile and n
am_name
>
> to the Makefile and not use pkg-plist at all.
No, no, no.
This is not *preferred*.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-po
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Proposal: move x11/xclock to x11-clocks/xclock
Makes sense, please submit a PR and specify that I'll handle the PR
when the repocopy is done.
Thanks.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD C
2009/1/9 Pav Lucistnik :
> Florent Thoumie píše v pá 09. 01. 2009 v 11:13 +:
>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Andree
>> wrote:
>> > please?
>>
>> I think Pav committed the fix right after you sent the email yesterday.
>
> I don't th
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
> please?
I think Pav committed the fix right after you sent the email yesterday.
--
Florent Thoumie
f...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
h
attached implementation can
> cover most of the use case, but there may be something I missed.
> Comments are welcome.
Hi Hiroki-san,
There's an open PR with patches for this feature (ports/108514). Could
you have a look and maybe send your comments?
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTEC
ple, different video cards present.
> - Several drivers are virtual (eg dummy, fbdev)
Or you can just depend on xorg-drivers, and let people select the drivers
they want if they use ports. They will get 8 of them (instead of the whole
bunch) if they use packages, this wi
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florent Thoumie wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:08:03 +0100
>>>
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:08:03 +0100
> "Florent Thoumie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Olafur Osvaldsson
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Olafur Osvaldsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is something the PR responsible introduced in his original patch...
It's still present in your version. Anyway, I'm not blaming anyone,
just pointing out what I think is a mistake.
--
Flo
g
rid of the check completely.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
really. This is a bit dangerous.
>
> The dangerous part is "the mtime of the directory". It would be much
> better to use the mtime of the +CONTENTS file, since it never changes
> *after* the package has been installed.
It actually does if you're using portupgrade (and
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florent Thoumie wrote:
>>
>> This adds support for /etc/pkg.conf configuration file.
>> Also, this adds support for naive multi-site package fetching.
>>
>> Any comment welcome
/ports/pkg-install-0a553aac.tar.bz2
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
an/man1/atf-cleanup.1
man/man1/atf-compile.1
man/man1/atf-exec.1
You need to set MAN1= atf-test-program.1 atf-config.1 ..., this is
relative to MAN1DIR, not WRKSRC.
Also, by default ATF_SHELL is set to /usr/local/bin/bash so you need
to add shells/bash as a d
eing spawned if he releases lzma from under LGPL. He
> might change his mind in the future, though.
>
> So I guess we'll have to stick to using lzma from ports for now.
Maybe releasing the extracting code under public domain?
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Commi
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The subject says everything:
Me.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
progressively, as the ports are updated. For that reason, we ask you
not to include any reference to X11BASE in your submissions from now
on.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Benjamin Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This patch has been sitting in GNATS for a couple of months now:
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.
it by default, figure out
which ports break and why, fix where possible?
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FYI.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 9:47 PM
Subject: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk ports/devel Makefile
ports/emulators/stonx Makefile ports/emulators/vmware-guestd5 Makefile
ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6 Ma
ave always been on the developers' systems).
You're lucky you got an answer.
Next time change the tone of your email, kthxbye.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
g/2008-January/031918.html
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-January/032099.html
Done.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
etc/rc.conf to use the base _dhcp user/group.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Jan 18, 2008 12:01 PM, Erik Van Benschoten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Is there a specific reason that the port of the ISC's DHCP server does
> not seem to have/use a registered UID/GID?
Maybe because there's already _dhcp user (uid 65) in base?
)
I updated that port to 1.06.21 a short while ago cause I needed it for
xmlrpc support in rtorrent and this stable version was recent enough.
1.12.x is the advanced branch (development). Since it's not my port
and I'm not familiar with it, I'm not comfortable updating the port to
a po
ould be in
base or not is another matter, IMHO it's a handy hack but a hack
nonetheless :-)
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 16:43 +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> On Saturday 22 September 2007, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> > Greg Rivers wrote:
> > > After upgrading to 7.3 I noticed that xorgcfg is no longer installed.
> > > It is no longer included in the x11-servers/xorg-server
.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Florent Thoumie wrote:
FT> > portupgrade -R xorg on RELENG_6/i386 finished, but leads to:
FT> >
FT> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/mail# pkgdb -uF
FT> > ---> Updating the pkgdb
FT> > ---> Checking the pa
(xorg-libraries-7.3)
Unlink which dependency? (? to help):
Any hints? Thanks.
Fixed in CVS already.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
efile distinfo
ports/x11-drivers/xf86-input-citron Makefile distinfo ...
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:45:43 + (UTC)
From: Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
flz 2007-09-13 19:45:08 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Log:
- Update X.org ports to 7.3.
- Mar
fine on my box ( 6.2-RELEASE-p4 )
I've updated those ports to their latest versions.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe,
I'll answer when I'm back.
flz 4 x11@
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
.
>>
> OK. They didn't work for me.
>
> [...]
I've read all the email you sent twice and haven't found what was wrong.
Can you be a little more specific or give error messages? Cause "blah
fails" just isn't enough.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
gt; /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6
>
> Can someone more familiar with this lend a helping hand, please? I
> assume we do want to support users still running older versions of X,
> don't we?
Not really. This is why XFree86-4 will go away in a few months.
In that case, it'
ines good luck for the next few days, cause they're
gonna need it.
flz for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS: Read UPDATING.
PPS: If things break badly, I'm at the beach, sipping a mojito.
[1] http://wiki.freebsd.org/ModularXorg
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
roblem if you have the symlink from X11R6 to local.
But yes, this will be fixed.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ple upgrading to x.org 7.2 and still having their distfiles:
Any reason why PORTREVISION is part of DIST_SUBDIR? Cause it caused a
few breakages for no apparent real benefit. Using PKGNAME to define
DISTNAME or DISTFILES is also a bad thing IMO.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
n problems, erretas etc?
>>>> Not currently.
>>> Give me a second.
>>>
>>> See http://wiki.freebsd.org/ModularXorg#preview on Updating.
>> Done
>
> Thanks!
BTW, I've uploaded a new tarball (containing INDEX-6) and a new patchset
+ INDEX-6.
Re
e.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/ports.xorg72.diff.bz2 is only 461 Kb
>>
>> In fact, that's what we've been promised - a diff :-)
>
> Dunno who promised this to you, but it was never the plan.
Was about to say the same.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
replacement
for portsnap (which IMHO is much faster, if you're not doing any
development).
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the page already does not show any of git pages
> and information, anymore. That is the reason why I am asking...
We're committing a last round of fixes and will submit a tarball for
testing hopefully tonight or tomorrow.
As soon as we'll get enough success reports, we'll go a
tty straight-forward like fixing plist issues due to
prefix merge, setting USE_GL when it's not, ... so it shouldn't take
that long, assuming I'm not alone with miwi.
Anyway, the more who comes, the quicker it will be.
Thanks.
[1] http://nikki.xbsd.org/xorg-bigdiff-20070410.
0 src/sys/modules/iwifw/iwi_monitor/Makefile (new)
1.286 +1 -1 src/sys/sys/param.h
1.6 +30 -4 src/sys/tools/fw_stub.awk
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the last one, cause time spent
on beryl ports isn't spent on something else.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e to
cross-mailing.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ably examine systems where this already works
> (I'd start with debian).
>
> Currently in ports, you just have to bark at users
> to perform some actions manually.
Nobody barks here.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
have a corresponding @exec statement in your
> pkg-plist.
[...] or the "make install" step might also create empty directories.
You should add those with "@exec mkdir -p %D/share/foo" in the packing
list. Note that these steps won't tell you if you have installed files
not recorded in the packing list. Using PREFIX=/tmp/foo usually help,
assuming it is prefix-clean.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
6 5-exp
> 1502 ! Jan 11 User Ports-i386 (1002) vim-7.0.178_3 failed on i386 5-exp
Can you also add that maintainers failing to fix these issues won't be
able to complain if some random committer pass by and fix them?
I think you've sent enough email now so that responsible mainta
ourceforge.net/
Yeah that's the Linux version.
> General Question:
> I have USB camera on my laptop built in, Is FreeBSD support this kind of
> camera?
Well, can't really tell without knowing the type of camera, but the
answer is probably no.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
eciate any help to fix those.
Anyway, have a nice week end!
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
assle. Anyway, work isn't finished and we could
probably use your help.
The ports PR count is approximately 815 and we could easily do better
than that, so join IRC next weekend and help us close some of those PRs.
Cheers.
PS: A PR a day keeps the doctor away.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTE
reason to stay with XFree86-4, don't do it.
There might still be driver issues with X.org so if you're aware of such
things, please contact the X.org developers so they can fix it upstream.
On behalf of the x11@ team.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
signa
e. Most ports listed are easy to fix
Still, it's boring work (yet necessary).
I'd like to thank you, Frank and Martin again (along with contributors)
for your work on this.
Cheers.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:44:25PM +0000, Florent Thoumie wrote:
>> Joel Dahl wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 18:24 +0000, Florent Thoumie wrote:
>>>> Doug Barton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Currently we have 2 locations for
Joel Dahl wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 18:24 +0000, Florent Thoumie wrote:
>> Doug Barton wrote:
>>
>>> Currently we have 2 locations for files installed by ports. LOCALBASE
>>> (which defaults to /usr/local) and X11BASE (which defaults to
>>> /usr/X
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
