Re: USES = libtool and missing .la files [WAS Re: pkg-plist for devel/glib20]

2014-09-08 Thread Graham Todd
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, gt...@bellanet.org wrote: I have not been continuously building ports so I can't say when the failures started but a larger number of ports began to include 'USES=libtool ' about a week ago. Perhaps pkg-plist files are not including the files due to this change. /usr/po

Re: USES = libtool and missing .la files [WAS Re: pkg-plist for devel/glib20]

2014-09-08 Thread Graham Todd
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Tijl Coosemans wrote: [snip] 'USES=libtool ' about a week ago. Perhaps pkg-plist files are not including the files due to this change. /usr/port/UPDATING doesn not warn of any problems or fallout from 'USES=libtool'. How best to resolve this? .la files are being removed

Re: portmaster --check-depends with pkgng exits immediately

2012-04-16 Thread Graham Todd
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:34:32 -0400, Alberto Villa wrote: On Monday 16 April 2012 16:17:52 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: So does "pkg check -ad" do exactly what "portmaster --check-depends" did before? I've been maintaining the portmaster patch so far, and didn't enable that option yet. In few

Re: ZFSv28, zfs list behaviour and sysutils/freebsd-snapshot

2011-04-04 Thread Graham Todd
On 03/14/2011 05:41, J. Hellenthal wrote: On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 04:30, mikael.urankar@ wrote: On Mon 14 March 2011 at 02:44:16AM -0400, J. Hellenthal wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:17, mikael.urankar@ wrote: Hi, I'm using sysutils/freebsd-snapshot

chromium 15 not building with heimdal 1.4.1

2011-10-27 Thread Graham Todd
(I will file a PR as well so this is not lost) This is the first time I have seen this error. I always have a local heimdal port (1.4) or a more up to date local build from source (e.g. 1.5.1) installed, and have regularly built chromium without any problems, so I'm thinking this must be a new iss

Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions

2012-01-18 Thread Graham Todd
On 01/18/2012 04:34, Johan van Selst wrote: > Nikola Lečić wrote: >> Anyway, it wasn't clear from the bsd.licenses.mk that we should >> use 'multi' in situations of 'any later version'. This means that >> all licensing info of eg. GPL2+ ports must be updated when GPL4 >> appears... > > No, we shou