December 21, I think you should revise that to at least
Firefox 12 or better.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:46:23 -0700
Ronald F. Guilmette articulated:
Who is allegedly maintaining the graphics/dri port at this moment in
time?
x...@freebsd.org
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
. If support for EOL'd crap was
implemented immediately, support for the newer versions would be
instituted lickety-split.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
assumptions and
thereby offers the simplest explanation of the effect.
It is usually translated as, simpler explanations are, other things
being equal, generally better than more complex ones. The key phase
being other things being equal.
Personally, I am a strong believer in Murphy's Law.
--
Jerry
% current.
Now, if you will excuse me, I want to look out my window and watch the
elephants fly.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
this problem?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
would be willing to work with a work group interested in determining
the feasibility of creating a working model for inclusion into the
FreeBSD architecture.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
.
By the way, portmanager does not have the problems you were
attributing to postmaster. Whether that is by design or just dumb luck
I cannot attest to. That is why I still use it although most other
users have abandoned it.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored
.
Script done on Wed Feb 22 16:55:58 2012
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:00:15 +0200
Andriy Gapon articulated:
on 23/02/2012 00:48 Alberto Villa said the following:
On Wednesday 22 February 2012 23:28:01 Jerry wrote:
Has anyone else had a problem updating the net-im/telepathy-qt4
port? It has failed to build twice for me in the past 12
The port version of /usr/ports/net-im/telepathy-glib is 12.7 while
the latest version is 17.5. The port maintainer is listed as
gn...@freebsd.org. Therefore, I was trying to find out if there are
any plans to update this port.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get
for no reason.
The port version is only 12.7 while the latest release is 17.5.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
The Ancient Doctrine of Mind
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:54:53 +0200
Andriy Gapon articulated:
on 23/02/2012 01:00 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 23/02/2012 00:48 Alberto Villa said the following:
On Wednesday 22 February 2012 23:28:01 Jerry wrote:
Has anyone else had a problem updating the net-im/telepathy-qt4
port
'\
s,%%MAKE_ENV%%,${MAKE_ENV},; \
Did you contact the port maintainer: sunp...@freebsd.org as well as
possibly submitting a PR against the port? If not, it might prove
useful.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply
over ride the check-sum problem, I feel it should be correct at the
source.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
was not caught earlier. I was under the
impression that some sort of verification was done on these updates
before they were released to the the mirrors, etc. If not, then perhaps
there should be.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:33:07 +
Chris Rees articulated:
This has already been discussed on ports@, please don't cross-post.
The problem has not been rectified as of yet. There is an open PR 165093
filed against the port.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get
Has a final solution been arrived at for the problem of updating
ghostscript9-9.04 9.05? I did not see a formal PR filed against it;
although I could have easily missed it.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
Are there any plans to update graphics/poppler port to the latest
version? The latest such release is poppler-0.18.3.tar.gz, released on
January 15, 2012 and corrects a few important bugs.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore
, it might be helpful for a potential user to know that prior
to attempting to use said port.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
and it seems to fail on i386
only; amd64 looks ok.
I just sent a full log to the maintainer.
I can confirm that it fails on a FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE amd64 machine.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
to to name other users of the device I was inquiring about. I
felt rather embarrassed to admit that I could not name a single one. At
least you had one.
Good luck!
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
of this application?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
If you perceive that there are four possible ways in which a procedure
can go wrong
a technical support address. It
also seems to indicate that it supports BSD, although that does not say
a lot in and of itself. In any case, have you tried their technical
support? I think I would start there before I went any further.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies
if you should experience any problems..
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 01:36:20 -0500
Sahil Tandon articulated:
This port has been updated to Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 2019.
Thanks Sahil. :)
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
hours.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:54:02 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema articulated:
Sloppy programmers should never be rewarded.
I couldn't agree more fully. Unfortunately, they all too often are.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:41:22 -0800
David O'Brien articulated:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:04:47PM -0500, Jerry wrote:
I understand that there seems to be some reluctance to updating the
shells/bash port until after the release of FreeBSD-9.0 at some
future date. I am not sure I understand
.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
with pointyhat.
Sahil, I know from time to time that you post on the Postfix forum.
Have you tried contacting Wietse, aka Mr Grumpy personally and asking
him for his take on the problem?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply
. Is there a possibility that this phenomena might
be rectified in the near future?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
different reason.
http://www.technograte.com/2011/05/18/gnome-to-drop-support-for-bsd-solaris-unix/
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/05/gnome-to-drop-support-for-bsd-solaris-unix/
--
Jerry ♔
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
When attempting to build the postgresql-client-8.2.22_1 port, this
error message is being emitted:
postgresql-client-8.2.22_1: Makefile error: you cannot include
bsd.port[.pre].mk twice
Has anyone else noticed it? I filed a PR against it.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off
, it also fetches the distfiles which are missing or
failed the checksum calculation. Defining NO_CHECKSUM will
skip this step.
You could also contact the port maintainer: ga...@freebsd.org
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list
to confirm if the condition still exists?
In any event, it works here. Sat Oct 15 2011 08:47:15 EDT
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:40:06 -0400
b. f. articulated:
On 9/26/11, Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu wrote:
On 09/25/2011 08:19 PM, Jerry wrote:
When attempting to build the math/fftw3 port, the following error
message is immediately displayed and the build halted
might be advisable also.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
This year October has 5 Mondays, 5 Saturdays and 5 Sundays
When attempting to build the math/fftw3 port, the following error
message is immediately displayed and the build halted:
Variable CFLAGS is recursive.
I have filed a PR against it.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored
I was wondering if there are any plans to update
sysutils/gnome-schedule? The port version is: 2.1.1, released on
2009-09-11. The latest version is: gnome-schedule-2.1.5 released on
2011-09-03. In any event, there have been several versions released
prior to this latest one.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po
on one of my machines, and it is working correctly.
dmesg | grep -i geforce
nvidia0: GeForce GT 220 on vgapci0
This is a FreeBSD-8.2 amd64 machine and the card is not exactly start
of the art either.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get
/WTF? If not, I would recommend you do so.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
to it.
Seriously, update to the current port version and the problem is
solved. There use to be several programs that were not compatible with
the port's version a few years ago; however, I believe I vetted those
out and was instrumental in getting them corrected. In any case, this
is an easy fix.
--
Jerry
2.99.x
branch is now probably comatose as well.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
Last week's pet, this week's
be a better solution.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
Actors will happen even in the best-regulated families
want to list what versions of the involved programs you have
installed. You might want to contact the maintainer AND file a PR. I
don't waste my time anymore.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply
;)
Please get in touch if you want to talk further about it.
In other words, you formerly believed you understood what you thought he
said, but have now realized that what he said was not what you thought?
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get
It has become apparent that the:
[ ] GNUTLS Build with GNUTLS instead of OpenSSL
option in the print/cups-client port is not working. Activating it
causes the port build to fail. Perhaps it is time to remove this option
from the port.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer
for myself - I do not know Jerry, but I definitely share
his sentiments and even find his tone quite funnily (is that a
word?) appropriate, as the ports quality, over the last year, went
totally, horribly, down the drain.
On some of my desktop setups, I keep about 900-1000 installed ports
use the article for free? I think I know the
answer to that one.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:26:29 -0700
Doug Barton articulated:
Including postmaster@ on this since IMO Jerry has earned himself a
short vacation from posting privileges.
Perhaps you would care to tell me yourself. It could be arranged.
On 8/28/2011 3:40 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14
how great it is and conveniently hides it deficiencies. They tend to
live by the motto, Never make anything simple and efficient when a
way can be found to make it complex and inefficient and blame
Microsoft or the hardware manufacturers for their problems.
Good luck, you will need it!
--
Jerry
therefore assume that I only have version 1.9 installed. Is that
correct?
Third, is there really any reason to go though all that bullshit to
downgrade to the previous version? I have not seen any problems
occurring on my system.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 07:13:42 -0400
Steve Wills articulated:
On 08/25/11 06:43, Jerry wrote:
I probably missed it, but according to the 20110823: entry in
UPDATING, the ruby port was downgraded to 1.8. My first question is
why?
Only which version is installed by default is changed back
counsel out.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 07:47:50 -0400
Robert Huff articulated:
Jerry writes:
That did not actually answer my question(s). Exactly why is the
port being reverted to 1.8 as the default;
Insufficient testing for whether 1.9 works with ruby-using
ports.
and how can I positively
Does the latest version of PHP found in the ports system correct this
problem:
https://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/serious-crypto-bug-found-php-537-082211
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply
://www.postfix.com/DEBUG_README.html
Read the Reporting problems to postfix-us...@postfix.org at the end
of that documentation. Be sure to include the output from the
saslfinger tool. This can be found at
http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 20:05:24 +0200
Hartmann, O. articulated:
That was the first I did ... but it doesn't help.
What mirror is the error coming from?
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply
once about a year ago contact the
respective maintainers; however, I never received a reply.
What I did was install tidy and then install tidy-lib. It seems to
work although it probably should not.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get
why belittle his remarks?
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
Famous last words of Davy Crockett, So what are all those
to bewilder the other two
competing contenders. The p5-libwww-5* example in the case of
portmaster being a perfect example.
Just my 2¢.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
)
The entire build log is located here:
http://www.seibercom.net/logs/phonon-xine.txt
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
if the port still did not work correctly, although that would be highly
unlikely.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
.
/quote
Interestingly enough, while strated
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=f***strated might be
apropos, I think the author meant started.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:28:04 +0200
Alex Dupre a...@freebsd.org articulated:
Jerry ha scritto:
I was wondering if anyone was considering adding the development
branch MySQL-5.6 to the ports tree?
Yes, I'm waiting for the next release.
Thanks }}:-)
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
I was wondering if anyone was considering adding the development branch
MySQL-5.6 to the ports tree?
http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/mysql/5.6.html#downloads
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply
. Simple do a pkg_deinstall on the
p5-Switch port and build the webkit-gtk2 port again. It works fine
then. Obviously, it is a pain in the ass, and I question why the
maintainer did not catch this problem before he submitted the port, but
that is not going to help you now.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po
Stop in /usr/ports/www/webkit-gtk2.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/www/webkit-gtk2.
This has previously been answered on this list.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-May/067795.html
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list
On Mon, 23 May 2011 22:09:30 +0900
Hajimu UMEMOTO u...@mahoroba.org articulated:
Hi,
# I've CC'ed the maintainer of p5-IO-Socket-INET6.
On Sat, 21 May 2011 08:36:45 -0400
Jerry je...@seibercom.net said:
jerry The port: /net/sendemail builds fine after the update to
jerry Perl
this evening. I am wondering if it
might correct your problem also. I don't use spamd so I cannot test
it myself.
BTW, did you post a PR against the port as well as informing the port
maintainer regarding this abnormality?
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list
On Mon, 23 May 2011 19:09:51 +0200 (CEST)
Marco Beishuizen mb...@xs4all.nl articulated:
On Mon, 23 May 2011, the wise Jerry wrote:
In my case spamd sometimes terminates, and sometimes not. I don't
know when or why unfortunately.
Did you try the patch from Hajimu UMEMOTO u
the maintainer of the
net/p5-IO-Socket-INET6 port will update it so that this hack isn't
necessary.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Sun, 22 May 2011 03:14:06 +0100
Jase Thew free...@beardz.net articulated:
On 21/05/2011 23:30, Jerry wrote:
On Sat, 21 May 2011 22:38:33 +0400
Ruslan Mahmatkhanovcvs-...@yandex.ru articulated:
21.05.2011 22:30, Doug Barton пишет:
Check /usr/local/lib/perl5/ and /usr/local/lib
redefined at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.0/Exporter.pm line 67.
at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/IO/Socket/INET6.pm line 21
Did you file a PR against it? IMHO, the more PRs filed against this
problem, the sooner it will be resolved.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
/make_names.pl line 38.
gmake: *** [DerivedSources/HTMLElementFactory.cpp] Error 2
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/www/webkit-gtk2.
The complete log file is available at:
http://seibercom.net/logs/webkit-gtk2.txt
FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE amd64
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off
reported and www/web-gtk2 for which a fix is not yet
ready.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Sat, 21 May 2011 14:32:26 +0200
Christoph Moench-Tegeder c...@burggraben.net articulated:
## Jerry (je...@seibercom.net):
Can't locate Switch.pm in @INC (@INC
contains: ./WebCore/bindings/scripts /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.0/BSDPAN
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/mach
/usr
will be crawling out of the woodwork. In any
case, it is a problem that needs solving.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
. If no one has bothered to fix it
by now, then in all probability no one will.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
To you I'm
On Sun, 8 May 2011 12:30:46 -0400
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org articulated:
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 09:24:49 -0400, Jerry wrote:
I just noticed that there appears to be an old PR,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/132515 that is still
open. Has a resolution to this PR ever
.
Perhaps asking the community for a list of users wishing to offer free
space for hosting orphaned ports/distfiles/etcetera might be an easier
crapshoot.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Sun, 1 May 2011 12:45:24 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com articulated:
On 1 May 2011 12:34, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Sun, 1 May 2011 09:40:21 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com articulated:
On 1 May 2011 08:31, mato gam...@users.sf.net wrote:
There are usually many
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:42:26 -0700
Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net articulated:
On Wed 27 Apr 2011 at 16:15:19 PDT Jerry wrote:
Following through on that logic, only the highest priority items
would ever get done. Since there is a never ending list of things
that have to be done at any
chocks on the port if a previous version is
installed.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
Hire the morally handicapped
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:05:22 +0200
Matthias Andree mand...@freebsd.org articulated:
Am 28.04.2011 01:25, schrieb Jerry:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:54:45 +0200
Olli Hauer oha...@freebsd.org articulated:
Maybe you have some time to spend?
Before I could reasonable be expected to set
of the proposal.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
The more we disagree, the more chance
there is that at least one of us is right
submit items for
approval are also volunteers. They deserve at least as much respect as
those who are actively working on those submitted items.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
, there is no logical reason to jump over one user's
submission and proceed with another user's submission without formally
notifying the submitter of the older item why his/her item is being
bypassed.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:50:52 -0400
Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com articulated:
Jerry writes:
Ha, i've submitted mine about two months ago and still no luck.
Personally, I believe that the current system, if not partially
broken, is far from ideal. I would prefer to see a system
should all be able to come
to some consensus as to what constitutes a reasonable time frame.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:48:36 +0200
Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se articulated:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:32:58AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:50:52 -0400
However, I do find troubling you statement regarding a large update
to an older port or even a new port
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:33:05 +0200
Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se articulated:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:12:57AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:48:36 +0200
Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se articulated:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:32:58AM -0400, Jerry wrote
wrong I cannot find one PR opened
by you.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?originator=seibercomclosedtoo=on
And you won't either. The ports I maintain, and there are only a few,
are under a different alias.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get
of an application,
just remove it from the ports structure and see how many users complain.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
, then good riddance. If on
the other hand a user claims a valid use of the port, let them take
responsibility for it or find someone who will. Leaving intact ports
that either don't build, cannot be fetched, etcetera does not really
make a lot of sense.
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+po...@seibercom.net
not just back up
what you need and then zero out the entire drive and install the
latest versions of FreeBSD from scratch.
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
plugin /usr/local/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/nphelix.so
into /home/jerry/.mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.nphelix.so
Install plugin /usr/local/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
into /home/jerry/.mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
Auto-install plugins from /home/jerry/.mozilla/plugins
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:21:45 -0400
Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com articulated:
Jerry writes:
I run nspluginwrapper -a -v -i in that directory, as I always
did after upgrading that port.
I think that you are talking about that, aren't you?
When I try and run that command, I
201 - 300 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
