Re: Deprecation of portsnap (was: Proposed ports git transition schedule)

On Apr 11, 2021, at 06:27, free...@oldach.net wrote: > > However checking out is a one-time action with ports as there is only > one branch It sure looks like gitup is checking the entire port tree every single time. If I run it twice in a row it is no faster the second time.

Re: ln -s python3 python2 && ln -s python37 python27?

On Aug 7, 2020, at 21:04, Chris wrote: > Can I simply avoid all this BS by deleting python2.7 and family, > and simply link all references to python3.7. This is quite maddening. Aren’t the python versions pretty different? I wouldn’t expect a big project with dependencies written for python2

Re: Lsof port can't build (again)

On Jun 16, 2020, at 06:41, Mike Bristow wrote: > > That is not present in the file on relent/12.1, which is probably the same as > yours. I suspect that you have an out-of-date /usr/src. I just installed the source, and ran the svn update just in case. > (This does beg the question of why

Re: OpenSSL multiple names?

On Feb 7, 2020, at 13:20, Rainer Hurling wrote: > > Did you try > > 'portmaster -o security/openssl openssl111-1.1.1d' Yes, that failed with no error. Trying to uninstall openssl111 said there was no such port. > (with DEFAULT_VERSIONS= ssl=openssl, instead ssl=openssl111)? That was set

Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

On Oct 11, 2019, at 06:44, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: > > LuKreme wrote on 2019/10/11 00:23: >> On Oct 10, 2019, at 10:01, Lars Liedtke wrote: >>> Why not just make building in IPv6 support the default, and introduce a >>> flag if someone re

Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

On Oct 10, 2019, at 10:01, Lars Liedtke wrote: > > Why not just make building in IPv6 support the default, and introduce a > flag if someone really needs or wants to build without that support? Because it adds to the load of testing. If you really need it, build from source. -- My main job

Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary?

On Oct 9, 2019, at 00:15, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > I agree I don't see the reason why we should keep that ipv6 option. When off > this option does not bring much value to the users as the code for apps to > support ipv6 mostly reside in the libc. Actually that was my intent in 2012 to >

Cannot build p5-Net-SSLeay

===> Fetching all distfiles required by p5-Net-SSLeay-1.85 for building ===> Extracting for p5-Net-SSLeay-1.85 => SHA256 Checksum OK for Net-SSLeay-1.85.tar.gz. ===>>> make build failed for security/p5-Net-SSLeay ===>>> Aborting update FreeBSD 11.2 with openSSL 1.1.1

Re: Suggestion to split games category into games-console, games-engine and games

On Apr 21, 2019, at 09:42, Sid wrote: > Something like: > REFUSE x11 irc games cad finance Thank you! I’ve been asking for this for literally YEARS. Probably since FreeBSD 4 days... -- My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways to reject even more mail. I'm

Re: dependancies and the ports that depend on them

> On Sep 22, 2018, at 16:55, Don Lewis wrote: > >> On 22 Sep, @lbutlr wrote: >>> On 22 Sep 2018, at 07:06, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>> You might give pkg_tree (ports-mgmt/pkg_tree) a try. It won't answer >>> the question specifically, but it'll show you how libX11 is being >>> brought into

Re: FreeBSD Palemoon branding violation

On Feb 7, 2018, at 20:06, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Just saying telling people not to call the product the same as the trademark > if there are any changes to the product is the way to protect the trademark. But is there a trademark? It seems not from an earlier post. --

Re: FreeBSD Palemoon branding violation

On Feb 6, 2018, at 15:21, Mark Felder wrote: > > After your recent harassment of OpenBSD > (https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86) I decided to investigate > our own packaging of Palemoon. As expected, we are also building against > system libraries. You can

Re: libiconv.la issues

On Jan 25, 2015, at 1:02 AM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote: On 2015-01-25 05:46, LuKreme wrote: On Jan 24, 2015, at 9:17 PM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: sed: /usr/local/lib/libiconv.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/local/lib/libiconv.la' is not a valid libtool archive

Re: libiconv.la issues

On Jan 24, 2015, at 9:17 PM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: sed: /usr/local/lib/libiconv.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/local/lib/libiconv.la' is not a valid libtool archive *** [libarchive.la] Error code 1 One other detail: $ find /usr/local/lib -name '*iconv*' /usr

libiconv.la issues

sed: /usr/local/lib/libiconv.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/local/lib/libiconv.la' is not a valid libtool archive *** [libarchive.la] Error code 1 $ portmaster -l | grep iconv === libiconv-1.14_6 === iconv-2.0_4 So, I force it to rebuild $ portmaster -o converters/libiconv

Re: py27-pytz-2014.7,1

On 30 Oct 2014, at 00:18 , LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: Got this error running postmaster -a -x postfix === Installing for py27-pytz-2014.7,1 === Checking if py27-pytz already installed === Registering installation for py27-pytz-2014.7,1 as automatic pkg-static: Plist error

py27-pytz-2014.7,1

Got this error running postmaster -a -x postfix === Installing for py27-pytz-2014.7,1 === Checking if py27-pytz already installed === Registering installation for py27-pytz-2014.7,1 as automatic pkg-static: Plist error, directory listed as a file:

Re: Something's gone pear-shaped

On 01 Oct 2014, at 17:35 , LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: On 01 Oct 2014, at 09:58 , Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote: On 10/1/2014 10:35 AM, LuKreme wrote: ns1 ~] $ portmaster -L === The ports directory (/usr/ports) does not seem to contain a ports tree === Aborting update

Something's gone pear-shaped

ns1 ~] $ portmaster -L === The ports directory (/usr/ports) does not seem to contain a ports tree === Aborting update === Killing background jobs Terminated === Exiting ns1 ~] $ ls /usr/ports/ .portsnap.INDEX accessibility databases germanmbone ports-mgmt www

Re: Something's gone pear-shaped

On 01 Oct 2014, at 09:58 , Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote: On 10/1/2014 10:35 AM, LuKreme wrote: ns1 ~] $ portmaster -L === The ports directory (/usr/ports) does not seem to contain a ports tree === Aborting update === Killing background jobs Terminated === Exiting What

make index fials

# make fetchindex /usr/ports/INDEX-9.bz2100% of 1697 kB 1541 kBps 00m01s # make index Generating INDEX-9 - please wait..make: don't know how to make describe. Stop *** [describe.arabic] Error code 1 1 error

Re: freebsd-update wants to update to version I'm running

On 09 Mar 2014, at 20:03 , Darren Pilgrim list_free...@bluerosetech.com wrote: On 3/9/2014 6:43 PM, LuKreme wrote: # uname -a FreeBSD ns1.covisp.net 8.4-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p7 #0: Sat Jan 11 01:45:47 UTC 2014 root@amd64-builde r.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC

Re: freebsd-update wants to update to version I'm running

On 10 Mar 2014, at 05:52 , Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu wrote: Hi! What does fetch do then? It seems odd that it would fetch files for the current version you already have installed, doesn?t it? It fetches newer patches. If you have 8.4p1 and do freebsd-upgrade fetch it gets the

freebsd-update wants to update to version I'm running

# uname -a FreeBSD ns1.covisp.net 8.4-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p7 #0: Sat Jan 11 01:45:47 UTC 2014 root@amd64-builde r.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # freebsd-update -r 9.0-RELEASE fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. Fetching metadata

Re: postfix depends on db41??

On 27 Feb 2014, at 18:42 , Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Lowell Gilbert wrote: LuKreme krem...@kreme.com writes: # portmaster mail/postfix210 [...] === Gathering dependency list for mail/postfix210 from ports === Launching child to install databases/db41

portmaster -L

when checking postmaster -L I get: === pkg-1.2.6 === No /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg exists, and no information === about ports-mgmt/pkg can be found in /usr/ports/MOVED and the same for === cclient-2007f,1 === net-snmp-5.7.2_3 === vim-7.4.182 I know pkg just got reinstalled by

postfix depends on db41??

# portmaster mail/postfix210 [...] === Gathering dependency list for mail/postfix210 from ports === Launching child to install databases/db41 === postfix210-2.10.3,1 databases/db41 (1/1) Why? postfix certainly does *not* require db41, and make.conf is set for version 5.3 # cat

Update gcc?

At the risk of starting a kerfuffle, is there any reason to update gcc on 8.4 or 9.2 from the GPLv2 version 4.2.1 to something more current? (I can think of many reasons *not* to, but they all have to do with writing code which I am not doing). I know 10.0 moves to clang (which is familiar to

[SOLVED] Re: Issues with postmaster after freebsd-update

On 13 Feb 2014, at 16:39 , LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: I was running FreeBSD 8-2 and used freebsd-update to update: OK, so final resolution: I reran freebsd update from the start and was still having problems. I made a couple of mistakes along the way (php55 and gcc49 seemed

Re: Issues with postmaster after freebsd-update

On 21 Feb 2014, at 18:49 , Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:52 PM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: On Feb 21, 2014, at 6:55, Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote: I don't think your upgrade to 8.4 is actually complete. posix_fallocate is in 8.4

Re: Issues with postmaster after freebsd-update

On 13 Feb 2014, at 22:46 , Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: An easier way is to install sysutils/bsddfminscripts and use pkg_libchk to find what needs to be reinstalled. I use the command: pkg_libchk -o | grep icu | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq ~/reinstall-ports portmaster -D `cat

Re: Issues with postmaster after freebsd-update

On 22 Feb 2014, at 19:40 , Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: the purpose is to get a list of ports that still link to the old version of libicu. Oh right, duh. `pkg_libchk -o` returns nothing now, after a rather long delay. Thanks to everyone for getting me through this. postmaster

Re: Issues with postmaster after freebsd-update

On 13 Feb 2014, at 22:46 , Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: pkg_libchk -o | grep icu | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq ~/reinstall-ports Sadly, pkg_libchk is part of pkgng and I haven't been able to get that to compile.

Re: Issues with postmaster after freebsd-update

On Feb 21, 2014, at 6:55, Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote: I don't think your upgrade to 8.4 is actually complete. posix_fallocate is in 8.4. How do I check? uname says its 8.4-RELEASE ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Issues with postmaster after freebsd-update

On 13 Feb 2014, at 22:46 , Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: pkg_libchk -o | grep icu | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq ~/reinstall-ports portmaster -D `cat ~/reinstall-ports` When all of the ports reported have been re-installed: rm ~/reinstall-ports pkg_libchk -o Thanks, I will give

Issues with postmaster after freebsd-update

I was running FreeBSD 8-2 and used freebsd-update to update: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p7 #0: Sat Jan 11 01:45:47 UTC 2014 r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC the next step I was given was to run portmaster -af This has been a freaking nightmare. I've managed to

Re: Issues with postmaster after freebsd-update

On 13 Feb 2014, at 17:03 , Janky Jay, III jan...@unfs.us wrote: Hello, I've ran into a few of these same sort of issues in the paste. What I did to fix it: 1) Migrate to pkgng. It looks like you already have based on the ports-mgmt/pkg udpate. But, then I see your pkg_install

Missing portsnap

I have a freeBSD 9.2 install that I set up a few months ago and when I went to install the del branch of ntp (postmaster ntp-devel) I get a failure at libiconv: === Cleaning for libiconv-1.14_1 === Found saved configuration for libiconv-1.14_1 = libiconv-1.14.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in

Re: Missing portsnap

On 10 Feb 2014, at 09:48 , LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: # portsnap fetch update Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. Fetching public key from portsnap.FreeBSD.org... failed. No mirrors remaining, giving up. OK, as it turns out this is not a ports problem, but a DNS

Re: Missing portsnap

On 10 Feb 2014, at 14:44 , Charles Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote: Hi-- On Feb 10, 2014, at 1:04 PM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: [ ... ] OK, as it turns out this is not a ports problem, but a DNS issue. I’m still confused: # cat /etc/resolv.conf 8.8.8.8 75.148.37.67 That's

Passing cmpile flags to portmaster

let's say there is a port I want to install, but I want to pass the compile -WITH-FOO-BAR, how do I tell postmaster I want to do that? -- You are forgetting something: the Nazgul are immune to non-magical weapons. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

Searching the port tree with portmaster?

Am I missing a search feature in postmaster? If not, how are people finding where a port is to install it (I had a heck of a time finding sudo, for example) -- FOUR QUEENS. HMM. THAT IS VERY HIGH. Death looked down at his cards, and then up into Granny's steady, blue-eyed gaze. Neither moved

Re: Searching the port tree with portmaster?

On 15 Aug 2013, at 06:33 , Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote: whereis sudo Sure, if sudo is installed. Sudo was not installed, so I had to search the ports tree for it. Same with openssl. I setup an alias alias pf='find /usr/ports -maxdepth 2 -type d | grep -i ' but was afraid I

Re: Searching the port tree with portmaster?

On 15 Aug 2013, at 10:13 , Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.com wrote: make -C /usr/ports quicksearch name=sudo Thanks you, that is much nicer. -- The point about being killed by magic was that it was much more inventive than, say, steel; there were all sorts of interesting new ways to die,

Re: Searching the port tree with portmaster?

On 15 Aug 2013, at 10:25 , Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote: Sure, if sudo is installed. Sudo was not installed, so I had to search the ports tree for it. Same with openssl No you are wrong. galacticdominator% whereis sudo sudo: /usr/ports/security/sudo Ah, right you are. --

postmaster php55 left php5 stuff

After updating a bunch of stuff, including php to 5.5, I have: php5-bcmath-5.4.7 php5-bz2-5.4.7 php5-calendar-5.4.7 php5-ctype-5.4.7 php5-curl-5.4.7 php5-dom-5.4.7 php5-exif-5.4.7 php5-fileinfo-5.4.7 php5-filter-5.4.7 php5-ftp-5.4.7 php5-gd-5.4.7 php5-gettext-5.4.7 php5-hash-5.4.7 php5-imap-5.4.7