You guys are still trying to read and interpret labels on the t-shirts I
think. "Sponsored by: XYZ" in the commit message only means that some
undefined portion of the work has been in some form supported or encouraged
by XYZ. It does not mean or imply all work, it does not mean any particular
PM, John W. O'Brien <j...@saltant.com> wrote:
> On 2018/05/17 19:18, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > John, no, not really, sorry. Work is done, credit is given. The form and
> > amount of this credit is between whoever does the work and whoever is
> > being credited. I d
t-shirt, having only meaning to whoever
produces the piece and whoever wears it, but nothing in particular to the
outside world. IMHO.
-Max
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 3:43 PM, John W. O'Brien <j...@saltant.com> wrote:
> On 2018/05/14 20:14, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > What's wrong with a curr
What's wrong with a current practice. Why is it of any concern to you,
John? Just curious that is not very clear from your message. It is like
someone trying to moderate what people in general or some group in
particular (e.g. freebsd committers) are allowed to put on their t-shirts
just because
P.S. John, the patch does fix it indeed, thanks!
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Maxim Sobolev <sobo...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> John, should I drop this into the port as a patch? Approved by: maintainer?
>
> -Max
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 4:10 PM, John Mehr <jm...@um
ISP change is no longer available) and
> I'm looking into finding a new place to host it (probably github).
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Maxim Sobolev <sobo...@freebsd.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, latest version of the svnup package is broken on several of my box
Hi, latest version of the svnup package is broken on several of my boxes.
I've tried few public svn mirrors makes no difference.
-Max
[sobomax@van01 ~/projects/softswitch]$ svnup ports
# Revision: 443456
Command Failure: HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 18:01:09 GMT
Server:
Hi Ed, I have not got time to look at diffoscope myself yet, but it's
definitely in my short-term TODO list. Quick question for you though. Would
it work given two tar.bz2 packages or does it need two directories? Just in
case it does it as well (although I do not hope for that much), our build
Are you going to keep support for the old way too? This is kinda crucial
for us (and possible other people) in order to properly build off-the-tree
(private) ports. Thanks!
-Maxim
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 07:27:10PM
Hi,
I am trying to portupgrade my subversion and it keeps trying to install
databases/db42 over already installed version (same version), missing the
shared library dependency.
Adding some debug into bsd.port.mk, I see:
=== subversion-1.8.3 depends on package: libtool=2.4 - found
set -x; set
P.S. This is fresh 9.2-RC3 with /usr on ZFS.
-Maxim
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Maxim Sobolev sobo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to portupgrade my subversion and it keeps trying to install
databases/db42 over already installed version (same version), missing the
shared
Sorry, should be fixed already. Thanks for raising the flag.
-Max
On Aug 16, 2013 10:03 PM, Matthew D. Fuller fulle...@over-yonder.net
wrote:
Hey guys,
Since databases/rrdmerge showed up in ports, portupgrade seems to have
gotten a bit unhappy with INDEX:
[Updating the portsdb
Hi,
Looks like portupgrade not longer respects error code returned by make
when building or installing package, which results in it uninstalling
previous version of the package when the build fails and not being able
to install it back ignoring the error code. Please fix ASAP, this is
Hi,
Looks like portupgrade not longer respects error code returned by make
when building or installing package, which results in it uninstalling
previous version of the package when the build fails and not installing
it back ignoring the error code of make install. Please fix ASAP, this
is a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cd //
[EMAIL PROTECTED] //]$ pwd
//
[EMAIL PROTECTED] //] /bin/pwd
/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] //]
What's that? Happens on bash 3.x, checked range of boxes from 6.x to 8.x
and arches from powerpc to amd64. cd /// at the same time is OK:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] //]$ cd ///
[EMAIL
way. Checking for '^# PROVIDE:' doesn't
really work reliably.
-Maxim
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Hi guys,
As part of testing how well some of our products work with latest
RELENG_6, I have make a new build and found that lot of important
services (for example PostgreSQL, Apache) doesn't start up
Hi guys,
As part of testing how well some of our products work with latest
RELENG_6, I have make a new build and found that lot of important
services (for example PostgreSQL, Apache) doesn't start up (despite
having respective xxx_enable entries in /etc/rc.conf) when installed
from the
What's the gain? Transition will be a really big PITA for most existing
users. Everybody who would be trying to install a KDE/GNOME or even a
general X11 port after a switchover still having all X11 bits in
/usr/X11R6 is likely to be screwed on build time, due to mismatching
includes/libraries
18 matches
Mail list logo
