Which compiler are you building with? Just using the normal lang/gcc
works for me without issue doing make install in lang/clang36. Are you
sure you don't have any local diffs or stale files?
-Nathan
On 03/16/15 17:18, Mark Millard wrote:
Basic context (more context details listed later):
# f
This builds without issue for me, both on a G5 system and on a POWER8.
-Nathan
On 03/07/15 22:16, Mark Millard wrote:
powerpc64 context (more details are listed later):
$ freebsd-version -ku; uname -a
10.1-STABLE
10.1-STABLE
FreeBSD FBSDG5S0 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r279507M: Fri Mar
This works fine for me. Are you sure you don't have some weird
configuration or hardware problem?
-Nathan
On 03/07/15 22:56, Mark Millard wrote:
powerpc64 context (more details are listed much later):
$ freebsd-version -ku; uname -a
10.1-STABLE
10.1-STABLE
FreeBSD FBSDG5S0 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD
9-16 18:05, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
< snip very long conversation>
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-September/095521.html
I've made a third version of the patch that chases some recent updates to the
ports tree and can be found at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~nwhi
On 08/26/14 09:01, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 08/18/14 15:02, olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-08-18 18:15, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 08/14/14 13:40, olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-08-14 21:42, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/14/2014 2:38 PM, olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-08-14 17:35, Nathan Whitehorn wrote
As a slight distraction from the topic, is this actually possible in
general? I'm thinking in particular of ports that install kernel
modules. Since LOCALBASE may be (and very often is) a different file
system from /, such modules cannot be accessible to loader and so can't
be loaded in early b
On 08/18/14 15:02, olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-08-18 18:15, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 08/14/14 13:40, olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-08-14 21:42, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/14/2014 2:38 PM, olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-08-14 17:35, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
...
Something I've mentioned to Bapt
On 08/14/14 13:40, olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-08-14 21:42, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/14/2014 2:38 PM, olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-08-14 17:35, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
...
Something I've mentioned to Bapt a few times is that pkg needs a way to
have a list of accepted ABI strings. Then we
On 08/14/14 12:42, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/14/2014 2:38 PM, olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-08-14 17:35, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 08/14/14 08:02, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 5/28/2014 11:54 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
The current/previous values are also kept so
that the patched pkg can install a
On 08/14/14 12:38, olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-08-14 17:35, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 08/14/14 08:02, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 5/28/2014 11:54 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
The current/previous values are also kept so
that the patched pkg can install a package marked either with an x86:64
or
On 08/14/14 08:02, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 5/28/2014 11:54 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
The current/previous values are also kept so
that the patched pkg can install a package marked either with an x86:64
or amd64-type architecture ID (symlinks will be needed for a little bit
on the package
On 06/26/14 14:30, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:22:30AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 05/28/14 10:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:54:03AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
The following was in a deep and increasingly branched thread on the
On 07/26/14 12:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:39:46AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 07/24/14 23:56, John Hay wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:42:51PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
I'm very please to announce the release of pkg 1.3.0
This versi
On 07/24/14 23:56, John Hay wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:42:51PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
I'm very please to announce the release of pkg 1.3.0
This version is the result of almost 9 month of hard work
...
Thank you to all contributors:
Alberto Villa, Alexandre Perrin, An
On 06/26/14 14:30, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:22:30AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 05/28/14 10:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:54:03AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
The following was in a deep and increasingly branched thread on the
On 06/26/14 12:00, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:30:39AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
wrote:
On 06/26/14 08:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:35:14AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 06/26/14
On 06/26/14 08:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:35:14AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 06/26/14 03:02, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:23:05AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
As I mentioned earlier, you can set "FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc" in
On 06/26/14 09:36, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 06/26/14 08:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:35:14AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 06/26/14 03:02, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:23:05AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
As I mentioned earlier, you can
On 06/26/14 08:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:35:14AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 06/26/14 03:02, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:23:05AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
As I mentioned earlier, you can set "FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc" in
On 06/26/14 03:02, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:23:05AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
As I mentioned earlier, you can set "FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc" in
make.conf, and it'll build with gcc47.
FAVORITE_COMPILER looks more like a hack to me. Ideally boost's port
Makefile should
On 05/28/14 10:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:54:03AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
The following was in a deep and increasingly branched thread on the SVN
list. I've forwarded the relevant part here. The discussion was on using
MACHINE_ARCH codes for pa
On 06/15/14 13:07, Jan Beich wrote:
firefox-29.0_1,1.txz.out.log writes:
Executing
/obj/buildshare/ports/355755/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-powerpc-portbld-freebsd10.0/dist/bin/xpcshell
-g
/obj/buildshare/ports/355755/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-powerpc-portbld-freebsd10.0
On 06/15/14 13:07, Jan Beich wrote:
firefox-29.0_1,1.txz.out.log writes:
Executing
/obj/buildshare/ports/355755/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-powerpc-portbld-freebsd10.0/dist/bin/xpcshell
-g
/obj/buildshare/ports/355755/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-powerpc-portbld-freebsd10.0/
Over the last few weeks (2 cores makes the build take a long time!),
I've built a complete set of 32-bit PowerPC packages for 10-STABLE,
which can be found at
http://people.freebsd.org/~nwhitehorn/powerpc-10-packages. This address
can be used as a pkg repository, but also contains a post-mortem
The following was in a deep and increasingly branched thread on the SVN
list. I've forwarded the relevant part here. The discussion was on using
MACHINE_ARCH codes for package architectures in pkg instead of the
existing ones (which are equivalent) to make script-writing easier and
improve cons
On 03/22/14 14:00, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
On 03/22/2014 01:57 PM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
wrote:
On 03/22/14 11:12, Randy Bush wrote:
At least testing branches would be appreciated.
Something like ivoras@ suggested two years ago?
http
On 03/22/14 11:12, Randy Bush wrote:
from another team member, also a long time freebsd user of decades
firefox build bombs because something has hardwired gcc47, which is
not installed, so firefox's ./configure bombs testing hello world.
Attempting to figure out what has hardwir
On 12/17/13 17:28, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On 18.12.2013 01:27, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 12/17/13 15:32, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:12:05 -0600
Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 12/17/13 14:07, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:20:53PM +0100, Niclas Zeising
On 12/17/13 15:32, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:12:05 -0600
Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 12/17/13 14:07, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:20:53PM +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote:
To get VT switching when using KMS drivers (ATI, Intel) please use
newcons: https
On 12/17/13 14:07, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:20:53PM +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote:
To get VT switching when using KMS drivers (ATI, Intel) please use
newcons: https://wiki.freebsd.org/Newcons or if that is not possible,
force the use of the vesa driver for xorg.
It appears t
On 10/03/13 07:17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 03/10/2013 11:48 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
This also allows lots of new features to come:
- Allow to create sub-packages
- Allow to create debuginfo packages.
I'd like to mention a few other possibilities along the same lines:
- doc package
On 09/21/13 09:09, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/21/2013 9:00 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 09/21/13 05:47, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
Why only those architectures?
-Nathan
On 09/21/13 05:47, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
Why only those architectures?
-Nathan
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On 09/11/13 18:02, m...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
On 02.09.2013 02:13, Kenta Suzumoto wrote:
Still doesn't build with Clang for me.
The failure is triggered by the -Wself-assign warning:
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/graphics/libfpx/work/libfpx-1.3.1-2/oless/h/fat.hxx:368:63:
error: explicitly assigning a
On 07/27/13 19:28, Peter Looyenga wrote:
> Hi gang,
>
> I've been professionally using FreeBSD for quite some time now (my company
> now uses 4 FreeBSD servers for web services) and during the implementation
> period I've become quite fascinated with the ports system. And this evening
> I suddenly
On 04/29/13 06:56, David Demelier wrote:
> 2013/4/17 David Demelier :
>> 2013/2/26 Hiroki Sato :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Ports to replace print/*teTeX* with TeX Live 2012 are ready for
>>> testing. Please note that this is not the final version and
>>> committing the new ones into the ports tree wil
On 02/28/13 14:44, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Hiroto Kagotani wrote
in :
hi> 2013/2/28 Hiroki Sato
hi>
hi> >
hi> > http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/texlive-20130228-1.tar.gz
hi> >
hi> > Please try this instead.
hi> >
hi>
hi> I tried this version and succeeded to install on 9.1R.
hi> But I m
On 02/16/13 14:41, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Chris Rees wrote
> in :
>
> cr> On 6 February 2013 13:50, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> cr> > On 02/05/13 21:01, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> cr> >> On 04/02/2013 21:08, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> cr> >>> 04.02.
On 02/20/13 10:35, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
anyone can recommend such thing, or a quick guide how to write that
simple thing?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On 02/05/13 21:01, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 21:08, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> 04.02.2013 10:21, Dominic Fandrey пишет:
>>> On 04/02/2013 02:04, Danilo Egea wrote:
Well, there is this project http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/
>>>
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?
Is there any hope for a new version of LaTeX in ports? Our teTeX version
is really old; there have no real updates to it since February 2005 and
it is becoming harder and harder to use without hand installation of new
packages and patches. I realize there are various unofficial solutions,
but they
41 matches
Mail list logo