On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:01:28PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 6/22/2011 1:28 PM, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:23:51PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 6/21/2011 1:02 PM, jhell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:48:57PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
An effort
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:48:57PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
An effort to upgrade to 20110208_1 is failing for me:
=== Installing for ksh93-20110208_1
=== Generating temporary packing list
=== Checking if shells/ksh93 already installed
install -o root -g wheel -m 555
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:23:51PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 6/21/2011 1:02 PM, jhell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:48:57PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
An effort to upgrade to 20110208_1 is failing for me:
=== Installing for ksh93-20110208_1
===Generating temporary
Hi Martin,
Would you mind adding the following to sysutils/zfs-stats/pkg-descr as
well here, http://www.vx.sk/zfs-stats/.
{{{
zfs-stats was branched from a previous revision of the original authors
code that is still maintained at the following URL. You may be interested
in some of the
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 01:27:18PM +0400, Subbsd wrote:
Hi
Сan someone explain that option JAIL means for JDK16 when this builds
within jail ?
I have not found any specific mention in the patch or the code:
grep -Ri jail /usr/ports/java/jdk16/*
/usr/ports/java/jdk16/Makefile:
,
Regards,
- --
jhell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
Comment: ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
Comment: IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE
/psyco.c:14:
c/mergepoints.c:242: error: 'JUMP_IF_FALSE' undeclared here (not in a
function)
c/mergepoints.c:242: error: 'JUMP_IF_TRUE' undeclared here (not in a
function)
error: command 'cc' failed with exit status 1
*** Error code 1
Regards,
--
jhell
anything to gain ? in respect to 'libxul'...
Regards,
- --
jhell,v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNHLeVAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+PKcIAIa7GY1eR9QP1hd2PL/LRrXa
sBmqHmCjThOzPDB7NL49EP7VHMDnKI9UPyTM41OmM3r7utdMQHNLb7DJT/qlayeg
+Mkv4LnFrWVbOVO0Hby38ABkMO25HHhJDvbk0G4l+B0Fa1W5WOaAqCncoIRQZ7dS
to alert the user with a simple All done reading ?
and a spill of output that effects that port up-to version being
upgraded. And yes XML and-or JSON could surely play a part in this as well.
JST
Regards,
- --
jhell,v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNGevwAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+r08H
RUBY_DEFAULT_VER=1.9
in /etc/make.conf. Or install portvcs under RVM[1]. After installation
type:
% ri PortVCS
to get additional help.
[0] https://github.com/gromnitsky/portvcs
[1] http://rvm.beginrescueend.com
Now there is something useful!
Thanks for this!
--
jhell,v
7.X correct ?
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
.
[1]
http://code.google.com/p/jhell/source/browse/base#base/projects/pkg_commit
Regards,
- --
changeset: 327:aef99c54e36c
tag: 8.2-PRERELEASE
user:J. Hellenthal jh...@dataix.net
date:Mon Nov 22 10:56:04 2010 -0500
description: Package database update by pkg_commit(1
) by
default.
It would be nice to support xz(1) compression for large selective
packages like firefox or openoffice as those will never run on smaller
systems.
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On 11/29/2010 18:40, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 29.11.2010 19:31, schrieb jhell:
Adding to this, as the manual says... The decompressing host will need
to have at minimal 5% - 20% of memory 'available' for decompression of
what the compressing host had. Seeing as FreeBSD still runs on systems
it still does not change the operation as to when
WRKDIRPREFIX has been set to somewhere else.
What are you saying here ?
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any
. So a cat(1) of
that results in installation being aborted.
Regards,
- --
jhell,v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM7gMtAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+zTEH/05XY2axBzCeJQPExRxf4lsF
aa13tNIH8GoTs7ZCndaajtVTUx5h31E/LE4LqmwW3eQ6i0cWgUkG6jbrnyhRNUgg
f287i2LdaYrp0DF2aZ6n5FlQLs4ogh3o20PXJAOyhQ8is4efcN
-4.2 instead ? or maybe another name so these can coexist ?
***
As well, timelimit-1.7 would be a great candidate for import into world
since it is your e-std 2 clause BSD license and a 3 file compile. ;) And
if noone else wants to maintain it in tree then ill volunteer.
***
Regards,
- --
jhell
in multiple Makefiles. Can this be corrected in the
ports collection.
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
.
Regards,
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
to bit-buc...@localhost.
Regards,
- --
jhell,v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMuRoIAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+JMUH/iIiKP0MrE9YTaKJNdkNpQOj
2teZgDrjWzWb4Ywzivff+BwrrT9gloBBjFfsDbhweaPHWZBCsjzbSiVfm99bLGG+
lRU43JMcXBQuAbSCF4DxDWp0UR2QhOtG1JJ8KmG5BZHJFApeqXmlgeGT/RUxkRCQ
TBmx
,
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
this might need/involve some checking to see if the users
log file already exists as we would not want to overwrite that by the
above command but nor do we want to blindly chmod(1) the file either
which is also done in the Makefile already.
Regards,
--
jhell,v
.
Does anyone know of a v6 patch for the new (3.2.4) source ?
Regards,
--
jhell,v
--- Makefile.orig 2010-10-05 23:26:16.738633363 -0400
+++ Makefile2010-10-05 23:25:14.727629085 -0400
@@ -14,11 +14,11 @@
ftp://ftp.mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.ncftp.com/ncftp/
DISTNAME
are pretty much dead, so unless there's a QT version floating around, GTK2.
editors/vim
editors/vim-lite
editors/gvim
editors/gvim-lite
?
Makes sense does it not ?
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
,
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 09/25/2010 09:24, Alexander Kojevnikov wrote:
On 25 September 2010 17:04, Alexander Kojevnikov
alexan...@kojevnikov.com wrote:
On 25 September 2010 15:44, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
Really awesome!
This will come in handy to serve up stable/*/UPDATING and head/UPDATING
asked this at one point so it might be a
good thing checking the list archives. But if I am correct the final
conclusion was to wait for the dust to settle in the dovecot-2 area.
Regards,
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
.
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 09/25/2010 19:01, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 02:49:02PM -0400, jhell wrote:
Going through some of my old OCR uses, I could the subject listed port
out of date and the URL referenced in the pkg-descr is non functional.
The new website for this port is:
http
On 09/25/2010 20:17, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
25.09.2010 22:49, jhell пишет:
Going through some of my old OCR uses, I could the subject listed port
out of date and the URL referenced in the pkg-descr is non functional.
The new website for this port is:
http://www.claraocr.org/en
!
This will come in handy to serve up stable/*/UPDATING and head/UPDATING
to. And thinking along those lines it could probably be incorporated
directly into the DAV tree on svn. to serve directly from there.
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
on Window$.
Thanks for inquiring,
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
for their work by any use of so
said product.
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
://www.keltia.net/BSDCan/paper.pdf
3). http://bit.ly/97Y8Xi
4). Because CVS just does not do any of this.
Make your final comparison here:
http://bit.ly/cyQBn8
For the sake of argument can you think of any reason to not switch ?
lets hear those, I'm interested.
--
jhell,v
up.
Lets do it! no excuses, it does not take very long to convert to
mercurial including keeping history intact and there is front-ends for
this all over the place.
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed unfortunately not
registering the files it installed already I found out that it is
installing to / ~! ugh.
Why is ${PREFIX} being used and not ${LOCALBASE} ???
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2010 17:19, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 01:49:37PM -0400, jhell wrote:
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed unfortunately not
registering the files it installed already I found out that it is
installing
On 09/17/2010 19:22, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 07:18:09PM -0400, jhell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2010 17:19, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 01:49:37PM -0400, jhell wrote:
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed
On 09/17/2010 19:52, Anonymous wrote:
jhell jh...@dataix.net writes:
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed unfortunately not
registering the files it installed already I found out that it is
installing to / ~! ugh.
Does the following diff fixes it?
%%
Index: editors/vim
hourly_check_rcscript2_enable=YES #
...
The rc.subr system should be able to handle this or service(8) by
calling status and taking appropriate action for each script within an
hourly_check_*_enable variable.
Just some thoughts to be expanded,
Regards,
- --
jhell,v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2010 15:10, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 12/09/2010 15:46:18, jhell wrote:
On 09/12/2010 09:02, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 12/09/2010 07:46:02, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
And you can't really know if it's a new install or an upgrade.
An app like
to it.
- --
Too many knobs...
jhell,v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMi1QcAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+lsoH/ijKOCcMkURTMcO+R/qcMF14
uL/QuhTwGrPReDGwUn15WvMDZRSgfSIChGngTMJiQPxbgFaCr6gCtzqpdgio
On 09/11/2010 09:19, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
On 9/11/2010 6:04 AM, jhell wrote:
Hi Apache Team Ports,
Would I be able to persuade you guys to bump or change if you will
USE_PYTHON_BUILD from -2.6 to -2.7 or switch to using USE_PYTHON=
instead ?
Comment from bsd.python.mk
port, or port directory given
=== Try portmaster --help
Would it be wise if portmaster was run with no arguments that it just
output the '--help' by default ?.
Thanks Regards,
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On 09/10/2010 17:35, jhell wrote:
Hi Doug,
Just thought I would write you about an unexpected output from
portmaster to get your opinion. I just ran 'portmaster' alone without
any arguments to get the list of --help. Surprising enough to me it
searched for a null port and output
On 09/07/2010 12:39, FreeBSD Ports wrote:
06.09.2010 19:53, jhell написав(ла):
I have just created a gdb7 port from the existing devel/gdb6.
Sir, if your port follows my example of having the Insight (GUI-front
end for GDB) as an option, you have my blessing. Back in the day I had
Good luck testing,
- --
jhell,v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMhX7zAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+BXoH/ituKPP9tcnnpPH50B6LpVfl
PgunL1zwUQ2ueCg4J4dOu6SHX9zd9xPLKbJNqemDWlMW6FKH7mafVhh/AIWdSXcx
On 09/06/2010 19:53, jhell wrote:
Hello Ports Users Porters,
I have just created a gdb7 port from the existing devel/gdb6. If you
would like to give this a few rounds of testing and ultimately decide if
it either a). needs adjustment or b). should be committed. then I would
greatly
On 09/05/2010 15:12, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2010-Aug-31 17:14:50 -0400, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
On 08/31/2010 15:06, b. f. wrote:
Would you elaborate, please? Where is a transcript showing the linking
failure?
Would you mail it to me off-list?
Simply -lgfortran by it self should
On 09/01/2010 01:41, b. f. wrote:
On 9/1/10, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
On 09/01/2010 01:14, jhell wrote:
On 09/01/2010 00:58, b. f. wrote:
No, it will still take effect, after the math/blas Makefile is parsed,
unless _WITHOUT_SRCCONF is defined. See bsd.own.mk.
ports(7) pulls
Freemind in a lot
of ways. Anyway... Thanks!
Regards,
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
LAPACK_version.o
gfortran44 -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc44 -pg -o testlsame lsame.o
lsametst.o
/usr/local/bin/ld: cannot find -lc_p
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
*** Error code 1
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
. At least in this
instance the user will at least know whats going on.
Regards,
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr
a C
program in this sense then gawd! only knows what the consequences would
be so why are we doing it here?.
Please do not take offense to any of this as I am just trying to
understand why in a sea of Makefile's define's.
Regards,
--
jhell,v
On 09/01/2010 00:10, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:06 PM, b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 8/31/10, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
Looking closer at the math/blas math/lapack ports:
This statement does not make any sense. The logic is backwards for every
instance
On 09/01/2010 00:58, b. f. wrote:
No, it will still take effect, after the math/blas Makefile is parsed,
unless _WITHOUT_SRCCONF is defined. See bsd.own.mk.
ports(7) pulls in src.conf ??? I hope I am not understanding this right...
--
jhell,v
On 09/01/2010 01:14, jhell wrote:
On 09/01/2010 00:58, b. f. wrote:
No, it will still take effect, after the math/blas Makefile is parsed,
unless _WITHOUT_SRCCONF is defined. See bsd.own.mk.
ports(7) pulls in src.conf ??? I hope I am not understanding this right...
No wonder why some
/math/blas/Makefile,v 1.47 2010/08/30 07:26:27 bf Exp $
Regards,
- --
jhell,v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMfEGwAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+cDUH/RfAGgADnpT862Ef2NrWYmvC
l49FDRSDjPpyWEAOX2tpQ4Is7
On 08/30/2010 19:41, jhell wrote:
The subject listed port fails to link during an upgrade from the
previous version. Looking into this further libblas.so.2 without being
linked to gfortran is correct as in the already installed previous
version installed inspected with ldd(1) shows the same
On 08/27/2010 09:30, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
How hard would it be to port i7z to FreeBSD? Seems like a very useful tool.
http://code.google.com/p/i7z/
This seems a little like ports/misc/cpuid, is it ?
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
@@
${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${_DISTDIR}/p4d ${PREFIX}/sbin/
post-install:
- @${CAT} pkg-message
+ @${CAT} ${PORTSDIR}/devel/${PORTNAME}/pkg-message
${MKDIR} ${DESTDIR}${P4ROOT}
${CHOWN} p4admin:p4admin ${DESTDIR}${P4ROOT}
${CHMOD} 750 ${DESTDIR}${P4ROOT}
Regards,
--
jhell,v
On 08/29/2010 09:18, olli hauer wrote:
On 2010-08-29 14:17, jhell wrote:
Hi Gordon,
I just upgraded devel/p4d port and you might find this patch
interesting. This port would previously bail out trying to display the
pkg-message file that it can't find without a path.
On a second note
to be using any of the
suggested ports-mgmt upgrade utilities so good luck. ``emphasis on
portmaster'' -- written by dougb@, so you know it works!.
Regards,
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
or arch
dependent but yet they are upgraded due to being listed as a dependent
of another port that needs to be upgraded. For example any package that
may be type shell script does not need updating due to a major lib
version bump of for say libpng.
Regards,
--
jhell,v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
On 08/19/2010 23:08, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 7:30 PM, jhell wrote:
On 08/19/2010 21:26, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On 19/08/2010, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
Adding to this I would like to see a central
allow you to
introduce possibly needed delays in the rc.
Here is a slightly modified version of Jeremy's script that I use.
http://bit.ly/cpbrlm
Food-4-Thought
Regards,
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
script, along with
PM_LOG. (Although, there was a meme from the early days that no Unix app
is complete until it grows the ability to do e-mail, so you never know ...)
I agree with you on this. Seeing as PM_LOG will be there that makes it
much easier to deal with.
--
jhell,v
a test to see if the package was already there but then
again I used this before extreme situations that the upgrades would span
the whole ports tree.
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
.
Regards,
--
On another note I wish wc(1) would output some headers above these. ;)
$ man portmaster |wc -Lclmw
6103363 30764 187
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
of people if not just me.
For the FreeBSD Project to have invaluable tools at-hand like these is
priceless and speaks for it self among all the features and tools available.
So with a final word,
Thanks.
Regards,
- --
jhell,v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD
it ?
Regards,
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 07/24/2010 23:38, Rob Farmer wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 7:49 PM, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
# New ports collection makefile for:python26
# Date created: 3 July 2003
# Whom: Hye-Shik Chang pe...@freebsd.org
#
# $FreeBSD: ports/lang/python27/Makefile,v
page faults
0 swaps
0 block input operations
0 block output operations
0 messages sent
0 messages received
0 signals received
77884 voluntary context switches
165392 involuntary context switches
Regards,
--
jhell,v
=/usr/ports/locate.databasea
for distinfo in $(locate /usr/ports/*/*/distinfo); do
grep SIZE $distinfo DISTINDEX.8.1
done
Regards Good to hear back from you,
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
at the moment.
Regards,
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
on being pulled
in by make.conf am I correct ? If so then you would also have to include
your make.conf on every host you expected that to work on right ?
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
to others that depend on those directly.
Temporary correction for this problem:
test -d /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg ||mkdir /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg
ln -s /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.1/mach/CORE/libperl.so \
/usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libperl.so
Regards,
--
jhell,v
:2052:.if !defined(_PERL_REFACTORING_COMPLETE)
./bsd.port.mk:2057:.endif # !defined(_PERL_REFACTORING_COMPLETE)
Regards,
--
jhell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any
or
enter anything for that matter.
Any clue at what might be going on or any more information that I could
provide to help deduce this ?.
Regards,
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
on whether or should
continue working on this (ie is there a chance that this could be
accepted).
regards,
Bapt
- --
jhell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMQjN7AAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+DlQH/3CHUb+k2Xty1MFt9h/Yyeki
SRxrPeTDhHJl90sF4EPmBV1TD5
/users/dougb/portmaster/release/portmaster.sh ?
;)
--
jhell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:04, jhell wrote:
In Message-Id: alpine.bsf.2.00.1007172201220.73...@pragry.qngnvk.ybpny
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:26, Doug Barton wrote:
In Message-Id: alpine.bsf.2.00.1007171825560.71...@qbhto.arg
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Joe wrote:
Reviewed the portlint and portmaster
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:43, jhell wrote:
In Message-Id: alpine.bsf.2.00.1007171823210.26...@pragry.qngnvk.ybpny
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:56, Ed Schouten wrote:
In Message-Id: 20100717105658.gv1...@hoeg.nl
Hello port maintainers,
I think I'd better send an email about this to ports@, because
The above subject mentioned port is broken via its usage of sysutils/lsof.
Log:
# ./tcplist
lsof: unknown -s protocol: li
lsof 4.84
latest revision: ftp://lsof.itap.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/lsof/
latest FAQ: ftp://lsof.itap.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/lsof/FAQ
latest man page:
On 07/13/2010 20:53, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 20:28:46 -0400, jhell wrote:
cc -O2 -pipe -combine -fno-strict-aliasing -combine -Wall
-I/usr/obj/usr/ports/net/ifstated/work/ifstated-4.7 -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wredundant-decls
Lol how long did it take you to write all these emails ? I see this one
is 4 hours later than the last one you have sent.
With all due respect I do not see anyone else having the problem that
you are having.
Following along Doug Barton posting a way for you to fix this I would
stick pretty close
of the
Software.
So why not just use that instead.
Regards,
--
jhell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
with ap22 and following that scheme would lead me to believe it is
sqlite3 even though I do know it is apr.
The only relevant SUFFIX I could see be usefull in this case is what
machine it was compiled for i386 i486 i586 etc... etc.. etc.
Anyway regards,
.03
--
jhell
,
--
jhell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 06/03/2010 15:27, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
On 06/03/10 12:39, jhell wrote:
I did not install a package named ap22-mod_perl2, I installed mod_perl2
from ports!. So when looking for this package to check its status with
pkg_info -g mod_perl2-\*
I get!
can't find package 'mod_perl2
a quick
way of doing this and you are already familiar with the internals of
portsnap I would appreciate greatly any feedback as where to start or
patches for testing. At-A-Glance I have minimal knowledge of the internals
of portsnap.
jhell/INBOX 21
Thanks for your time,
- --
jhell
On Wed, 26 May 2010 11:49, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
In Message-Id: 20100526154941.gc25...@hades.panopticon
* jhell (jh...@dataix.net) wrote:
Recently I have tagged the following popular but Cabalized applications
in the Ports Collection with the hs- prefix:
- darcs [1]: devel/darcs - devel
, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
-1
I believe this is one step in the right direction.
Running total: 4
;)
--
jhell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 23 May 2010 02:02, Matthew Seaman wrote:
In Message-Id: 4bf8c4f8.9090...@infracaninophile.co.uk
On 23/05/2010 04:47:49, jhell wrote:
But if a port can install a user there is no reason that it can not
uninstall a user via pw(8
-delete -print.
find / -empty
Of course these can be combined to form a simple one line command but I
will leave that as a exercise for the reader.
Regards,
--
jhell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
it helps someone.
Cheers,
Attached is the copy of the sudoers.default take a look through it to
see how to set a environment variable for use with portupgrade or
portmaster etc...
--
jhell
# sudoers file.
#
# This file MUST be edited with the 'visudo' command as root.
# Failure to use 'visudo
On 05/22/2010 08:42, RW wrote:
On Sat, 22 May 2010 07:58:38 -0400
jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
On 05/22/2010 07:08, RW wrote:
On Sat, 22 May 2010 03:29:38 -0400
jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
Having unused logins on a system is bad!
Why?
For one example:
This opens up a point
= ${NONEXISTENT}:${PORTSDIR}/lang/tcl85:configure
This was needed to provide configured values that graphics/togl would
then read.
Regards,
--
jhell
# New ports collection makefile for:Togl
# Date created: Wed Aug 18 18:49:17 EDT 1999
# Whom: Randall Hopper aa...@ipass.net
On 05/22/2010 21:11, RW wrote:
On Sun, 23 May 2010 03:39:53 +0400
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com writes:
On Sat, 22 May 2010 11:42:53 -0400
jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
This is more of a best practices case than what the implications of
leaving users
to narrow these down.
But if a port can install a user there is no reason that it can not
uninstall a user via pw(8) that is available from bsd.commands.mk after
checking a recorded md5(1) sum that it could create upon installation
for the output of pw usershow/groupshow UID/GID.
--
jhell
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
