Re: test

sorry ignore this wrong email address On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:33 PM, matt donovan wrote: > test > > -- > Technological progress is like an ax in the hands of a pathological > criminal. > -*Albert Einstein > > Breadth of Unix experience and depth of knowledge

Re: Pango not found .....

> > > I go to /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/pango and run make config and I get No > options to configure. > > If anyone can help, I would appreciate it. > > Kind Regards > Brent Clark > > > Pango has cairo support by default since it is a lib_depend for pango on FreeBSD _

Re: shells/bash-4.0 port horribly broken

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:31 PM, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:48:09PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote: > >> The update still remains broken: > >> [r...@portjail ~]$ echo $(uname) > >> -bash: command substitution: line 25: syntax error near unexpected token > >> `)' > >> -bash: co

Re: qt4 ports descriptions

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Marco Bröder wrote: > On Tue March 24 2009 22:47:28 Doug Barton wrote: > > Marco, I think you misunderstood what Chuck said. The term "attaboy" > > is an English colloquialism that means roughly "congratulations for a > > job well done." What Chuck is saying is th

is anyone working on a openjdk port

I been thinking about making it but if someone already started I won't I just not had the time at the moment to start it since it'll be good to have in the port tree even if it needs a java installed to bootstrap it ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing l

Re: is anyone working on a openjdk port

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: > matt donovan schrieb: > >> I been thinking about making it but if someone already started I won't I >> just not had the time at the moment to start it since it'll be good to >> have >>

Re: mail/p5-Mail-ClamAV

2009/3/30 Sergei Vyshenski > Hi, > > After updating of ClamAV to ver. 0.95, got problems with compiling > of mail/p5-Mail-ClamAV-0.20_5 (please see listing below). > > Port needs updated to 0.22nb1 to work correctly I do believe with later version of clamav.

Re: why was XFree86 dropped for ports?

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:13:46PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: > > I need to understand why all support for XFree86 has been removed from > > our ports. > > Because no one volunteered to do the work to support it. > > At any given time there ar

Re: why was XFree86 dropped for ports?

> > > I don't know git anywhere's near as well as I know cvs, but it seems to me > that > xorg doesn't have any TAGS so you can't ask for a particular release, isn't > that > true? I think that is probably a comment on git, not Xorg. I guess, > seeing > that there's about 1/4 the amount of work

Re: How to name a port for MPC (the C library)

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > I need to package MPC (http://www.multiprecision.org/mpc/) which > is going to become a prerequisite of GCC 4.5. > > In principle that should be simple, except that we already have > ports/audio/mpc which is something quite different. Any t

dsniff fails linking

when I try to compile the dsniff port it fails at linking. Sorry about the long paste in this email but I sent this to the maintainer as well. cc -o dsniff asn1.o base64.o buf.o hex.o magic.o mount.o pcaputil.o rpc.o tcp_r aw.o trigger.o record.o dsniff.o decode.o decode_aim.o decode_citrix.o dec

Re: dsniff fails linking

igate and fix this. Thanks for warning me. > > [1] > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=745549+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2009/cvs-ports/20090322.cvs-ports > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 4:47 PM, matt donovan > wrote: > > when I try to compile the dsniff port it fails

Re: dsniff fails linking

igate and fix this. Thanks for warning me. > > [1] > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=745549+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2009/cvs-ports/20090322.cvs-ports > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 4:47 PM, matt donovan > wrote: > > when I try to compile the dsniff port it fails

Re: www/firefox-devel?

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Josh Rickmar wrote: > I just noticed that www/firefox-devel was still in the ports tree. > Looking at the Makefile, this port will install 3.0 alpha 2. Shouldn't > this port be deleted? > > -- > To send me a personal email, please place [personal] in the Subject l

Re: Please update devel/boost

If you look On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:02 AM, cpghost wrote: > devel/boost is currently at 1.37.0, while the upstream is > at 1.38.0 (since 2009-02-09 01:36). If you have some time, > please update the port. > > Thank you. > -cpghost. > > -- > Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ > _

Re: screen and tmux should be listed under the same category

On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Josh Rickmar wrote: > > GNU screen is listed under sysutils, while tmux is listed under misc. > > Shouldn't the two at least be in the same category, since they both do > > the exact same thing? (tmux is even designed to be a BSD-license

Re: screen and tmux should be listed under the same category

On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM, matt donovan > wrote: > > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci < > pgollu...@p6m7g8.com>wrote: > > > >> Josh Rickmar wrote: > >> > GNU scree

Re: screen and tmux should be listed under the same category

On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 7:43 PM, matt donovan wrote: > > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: > >> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM, matt donovan >> wrote: >> > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci < >> pgollu...@p6m7g

Re: what does this mean?

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 10:03 AM, dan hirsch wrote: > 1. > > Running the csup(1)< > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=csup&sektion=1>command > later will download and apply all the recent changes to your Ports > Collection, except actually rebuilding the ports for your own system. > >

Re: FreeBSD Port: nessus-2.2.9_1

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Schweigert, Udo CERT < udo.schweig...@siemens.com> wrote: > No, there are no further updates as 2.2.9 is the last open source version. > > Udo > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:16:54 -0500, phillip.gonza...@metavante.comwrote: > > > > hi, > > > > i'm looking at the ne

Re: FreeBSD Port: nessus-2.2.9_1

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Alexey Shuvaev < shuv...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 07:07:12PM -0400, matt donovan wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Schweigert, Udo CERT < > > udo.schweig...@siemens.com> wrote: > > >

Re: vim ports broken.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Albert Shih wrote: > Hi all > > I think the vim ports is broken. > > When I try to compile I've got : > > [root@ vim]# make > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > => 7.2.041% doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/vim. > => Attempting to

Re: vim ports broken.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:59 PM, matt donovan wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Albert Shih wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I think the vim ports is broken. >> >> When I try to compile I've got : >> >> [root@ vim]# mak

Re: vim ports broken.

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos < unixma...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Philip M. Gollucci > wrote: > > Helmut Schneider wrote: > >> > >> matt donovan wrote: > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jun 19

Re: FreeBSD Port: mplayer-0.99.11_14

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Michael D. Stackhouse < mstackho...@samsa.com> wrote: > Is there an update available for mplayer? The current version at > http://www.mplayerhq.hu seems to imply a 1.0 version. > > We're having problems with this error, that is likely corrected in a > version gre

Re: What does py25 mean?

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Lars Eighner wrote: > What does py25 mean? > > I can't seem to upgrade about 40 ports (the old versions of which now seem > to be broken) evidently because the build of > > py25-gtk-2.13.1 fails with the message > >py25-cairo-1.8.6 needs Python 2.6 at least. But

Re: make package broken for multimedia/gstreamer

On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Koop Mast wrote: > On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 18:19 +0200, Raphael Becker wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > is this just a local problem (cvsup failed) or is this a general > > problem with multimedia/gstreamer? > > > > TIA > > Raphael Becker > > Check your libtool and liblt

Re: [HEADUP] FreeBSD Gecko's TODO and plan for future

On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Martin Wilke wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Howdy Guys, > > The FreeBSD Gecko Team will let you know what the plans for > the future are and on what we are currently working. > > Goals: > * Removal of mozilla, nvu, xulrunner and firef

Re: [HEADUP] FreeBSD Gecko's TODO and plan for future

On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 3:12 PM, J.-P. Klodzinski wrote: > matt donovan wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Martin Wilke wrote: > > > > Howdy Guys, > > > > The FreeBSD Gecko Team will let you know what the plans for > > the future are and on what

Re: [HEADUP] FreeBSD Gecko's TODO and plan for future

On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:52:43 -0500, wrote: > > Martin Wilke wrote: >> >>> Background: >>> We have a lot of old stuff on the portstree and it's time >>> to cleanup old stuff. >>> >> ... >> >>> * www/nvu last official release was i

palm/pdbc

I've just tried to fix the checksum error but for some reason the SHA256 sum does no match even though the MD5 one does. But since this is no longer being developed that I have found since the author's site can no longer be found. you can probably remove this or I can keep trying to fix the checksu

Does anyone know nginx's www path

Since I am trying to get this setup for a developer machine and I can't get to the default index.html. and it seems that the pid file is not created either with the port. All I get with a default nginx install is a 404 error ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

RE: pkg_trans progress

I have tried building this and it fails at two places one is the libinstall.a compiling which make buildworld creates. and the other part is at main.o but when I build this outside the source tree it does seem to compile and install just fine. ___ freebsd

What if a port doesn't have a version

I am writing a port for cinelerra and to grab the source you must get it from the git repo that they have. so the software doesn't have a version so to speak. Should I use the version from the installed version after I install cinelerra for the portversion and just tar it up? _

Re: What if a port doesn't have a version

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Chuck Swiger wrote: > | On Oct 27, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > |> |> Should I use the version from the installed version after I install > |> |> cineler

Re: [www/sams] What's wrong with my patch?

On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 2:14 AM, Yuriy Grishin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hello, > > More than 2 weeks ago I tried to take maintainership of www/sams because it > hasn't been updated for a long time. > Current state : feedback. (but I've sent the file) > Could somebody please explain me what wrong

What if a port uses build systems not supported by ports

Since I come across a few applications that don't use imake, gmake, or a configure script. How do I make these third party build systems work for the port system. For example one port I been playing around with is jam which is used to build a certain application. ___

Re: What if a port uses build systems not supported by ports

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Guido Falsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > matt donovan wrote: > >> Since I come across a few applications that don't use imake, gmake, or a >> configure script. How do I make these third party build systems work for >> the >

Re: ports/128999: [vuxml] [patch] update audio/streamripper to 1.64.0, fix CVE-2008-4829

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:06 PM, William Palfreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > 2008/11/24 Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 11/24/08 19:55, William Palfreman wrote: > >> 2008/11/23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> Synopsis: [vuxml] [patch] update audio/streamripper to 1.64.0, fix > CVE-2008-4829 > >>

Re: firefox3 support in bsd.gecko.mk

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Naram Qashat wrote: > Dominic Fandrey wrote: > >> There is no firefox3 support in bsd.gecko.mk. This seems to keep >> plugins and add-ons that would work in Firefox 3 as well from being >> ported. >> > > As far as I understand, plugins for any Mozilla products are

Re: minimal FreeSBIE bombs out

On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: > Hi Guys > Trying to build a FreeSBIE with MINIMAL=YES defined causes the buildworld > process to bomb out, below is the output from the log file, any ideas?? > > > > - > > >>> st

Re: palm/pdbc - why is it marked broken?

On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Hello, > I don't exactly have any use for the port palm/pdbc, but why is it > marked broken? > The commit says checksum mismatch, but if I remove the BROKEN line > from Makefile, it checks out fine here: > > r...@kg-v2# port test > ===>

Re: BIND poisoning??

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Albert Thiel wrote: > Whoever manages BIND.. > > SANS has a new warning/listing on BIND (Jan 7th) that may effect FreeBSD's > implementation, but I am > not sure... I'm just the mailman here :) > > http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5641&rss > > I checked versi

Re: pkg_info confusion (and configure.kde3)

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > I am reading pkg_info(1), I see that pkg_info can be executed without > any options/arguments, but the man page doesn't tell what happens in > this case. > > In practice I see that configure.kde3 executes pkg_info in the above > fashion (af

Re: upgrade 7.0 -> 7.1 : portupgrade -af required?

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Olivier Mueller wrote: > Hello, > > After an upgrade from FreeBSD 7.0 to 7.1 (with freebsd-update in my > case), is it required to recompile all ports (portupgrade -af) like > specified in some docs/blog-entries, or is it not *really* necessary? > What are you doi

Re: java/linux-sun-jdk16 distfile isn't available anymore

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: > Hi, > > I just tried to install java/linux-sun-jdk16 . The required file > jdk-6u10-linux-i586.bin isn't available anymore. Latest version would be > jdk-6u12-linux-i586.bin . > > Greetings > > Uli. >

Re: Xorg disaster

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Lars Eighner wrote: > > > Xorg upgrade (gory details follow) went south. I must have a working > graphics browser by Monday. This is pretty much *vital*, as in a matter of > survival. > > What is the fastest and/or surest way to get a platform that will run > fire