Hi everyone!
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 10:42:43 +0900
Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> I'm ready to update ports related Mesa3D to 7.6 base, graphics/dri,
> graphics/libGL*, graphics/libglut, graphics/mesa-demos and
> graphics/libdrm. Please see also my attached patch file. I'll
>
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:34:22 +0900
Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> > I'm ready to update ports related Mesa3D to 7.6 base, graphics/dri,
> > graphics/libGL*, graphics/libglut, graphics/mesa-demos and
> > graphics/libdrm. Please see also my attached patch file. I'll
> > update these
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 04:58 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:34:22 +0900
> Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> > > I'm ready to update ports related Mesa3D to 7.6 base, graphics/dri,
> > > graphics/libGL*, graphics/libglut, graphics/mesa-demos and
> > > graphics/libdrm. P
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:26:38AM -0600, Robert Noland wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 04:58 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:34:22 +0900
> > Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> > > > I'm ready to update ports related Mesa3D to 7.6 base,
> > > > graphics/dri,
> > > >
Hi rnoland.
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600
Robert Noland wrote:
> As much as I don't want to, I need to request a repo copy of libdrm in
> order to keep nouveau working... The bits needed for r600 were added
> just after 2.4.12 and the bits that broke nouveau were just before
> 2.4.13...
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 02:03 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> Hi rnoland.
>
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600
> Robert Noland wrote:
> > As much as I don't want to, I need to request a repo copy of libdrm in
> > order to keep nouveau working... The bits needed for r600 were added
> > just a
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:03:15AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600 Robert Noland wrote:
> > As much as I don't want to, I need to request a repo copy of libdrm in
> > order to keep nouveau working... The bits needed for r600 were added
> > just after 2.4.12
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 07:31 +0200, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:03:15AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600 Robert Noland
> > wrote:
> > > As much as I don't want to, I need to request a repo copy of libdrm in
> > > order to keep nouveau wor
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:38:50PM -0600, Robert Noland wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 07:31 +0200, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:03:15AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> > > On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600 Robert Noland
> > > wrote:
> > > > As much as I don't want to, I
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 08:15 +0200, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:38:50PM -0600, Robert Noland wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 07:31 +0200, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:03:15AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600 Robe
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 01:15 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> Hi rnoland.
>
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:13:14 -0600
> Robert Noland wrote:
> > The problem is that updating nouveau will mean that drm support will be
> > lost. The fake buffer object bits were removed only leaving full TTM
> > suppo
Hi rnoland.
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 11:04:52 -0600
Robert Noland wrote:
> One additional option that I've been considering, though I haven't tried
> it yet, it to construct a patch for 2.4.17 that essentially rolls
> libdrm_nouveau back to the 2.4.12 API. If we can pull that off, then
> everything i
12 matches
Mail list logo
