On Fr, 25.03.2011 at 07:11:42 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 19.03.2011 at 09:49:39 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
> > > do some changes to the categ
so can u guys please come back to the review of the ports for the categorie
move?
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Sat, 19.03.2011 at 09:49:39 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
> > do some changes
On Sat, 19.03.2011 at 09:49:39 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> Hey,
>
> as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
> do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
> largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories
> spinned out. On the other
On 03/24/2011 01:22, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
This would be a good time to include ports-mgmt/pkg_search into
the base system...
It would be a better idea to put the pkg_* tools IN the ports tree
where they belong. :)
Wouldn't this lead to a chicken-egg problem for t
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 01:12:49PM -0500, Eitan Adler thus spake:
When this change goes in, it may be a good idea to commit a documentation
change, as well, that cleans up and adds the new categories here:
Is the attached patch sufficient?
--
Eitan Adler
Looks good. I was going to create o
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:38, lists@ wrote:
you can then build category based directories with symlinks to the main
location based on what categories
My ports-mgmt/symports does something like this. It builds a full
directory tree of symlinks for the "secondary" categories.
I'm sure that someth
>
> When this change goes in, it may be a good idea to commit a documentation
> change, as well, that cleans up and adds the new categories here:
Is the attached patch sufficient?
--
Eitan Adler
www-category-porters-handbook.diff
Description: Binary data
__
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 04:41:33PM +, Anton Shterenlikht thus spake:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:23:22AM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:38:48AM -0500, Eitan Adler thus spake:
>>you can then build category based directories with symlinks to the main
>>location based on
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:23:22AM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:38:48AM -0500, Eitan Adler thus spake:
> >>you can then build category based directories with symlinks to the main
> >>location based on what categories
> >
> >My ports-mgmt/symports does something like this
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:38:48AM -0500, Eitan Adler thus spake:
you can then build category based directories with symlinks to the main
location based on what categories
My ports-mgmt/symports does something like this. It builds a full
directory tree of symlinks for the "secondary" categories
> you can then build category based directories with symlinks to the main
> location based on what categories
My ports-mgmt/symports does something like this. It builds a full
directory tree of symlinks for the "secondary" categories.
> I'm sure that something like this has been mentioned before.
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:34:35 -, Olivier Smedts
wrote:
2011/3/23 Doug Barton :
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
searching the INDEX file
cd
Doug Barton wrote:
> > This would be a good time to include ports-mgmt/pkg_search into
> > the base system...
>
> It would be a better idea to put the pkg_* tools IN the ports tree
> where they belong. :)
Wouldn't this lead to a chicken-egg problem for those who use
packages? How would one go a
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 07:04:26PM +, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
> > > If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
> > > it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
> > > searchin
2011/3/23 Olivier Smedts :
> 2011/3/23 Doug Barton :
>> On 03/23/2011 11:34, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>>>
>>> 2011/3/23 Doug Barton:
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
>
> If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
> it wasn't in there then the nex
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2011/3/23 Doug Barton :
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
searching the INDEX file
cd /usr/ports/ && ma
On 03/23/2011 12:04, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
searching the INDEX file
cd /usr/ports/&& make s
Doug Barton wrote:
> On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
> > If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
> > it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
> > searching the INDEX file
>
> cd /usr/ports/ && make search name=opera
This would be
2011/3/23 Doug Barton :
> On 03/23/2011 11:34, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>>
>> 2011/3/23 Doug Barton:
>>>
>>> On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
On 03/23/2011 11:34, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2011/3/23 Doug Barton:
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
searching the INDEX file
cd /usr/ports/&& make
2011/3/23 Doug Barton :
> On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
>>
>> If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
>> it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
>> searching the INDEX file
>
> cd /usr/ports/ && make search name=opera
Or
find /us
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
searching the INDEX file
cd /usr/ports/ && make search name=opera
hth,
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't cha
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 07:26:45 -, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Henk van Oers wrote:
From: Pav Lucistnik
Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100:
[...]
Where do you see the dividing line between web apps on one hand and on
the other hand "http servers
Henk van Oers píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 23:29 +0100:
> From: Pav Lucistnik
>
> Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100:
> [...]
> >> Where do you see the dividing line between web apps on one hand and on
> >> the other hand "http servers ... everything related to apache"? IOW,
> >> h
On 03/19/2011 11:52 PM, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
C/S model can not
clarify the developing web technology these years.
+1
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fre
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Henk van Oers wrote:
>
> From: Pav Lucistnik
>
> Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100:
> [...]
>>>
>>> Where do you see the dividing line between web apps on one hand and on
>>> the other hand "http servers ... everything related to apache"? IOW,
On 3/19/2011 8:48 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> www-clients - browsers, rss clients, wget-alike, webapi/soap clients,
>> benchmarks
>> www-servers - http servers, proxy servers, everything related to apache
>> www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries
>> www (rest, not moved) - html editors, author
> www-clients - browsers, rss clients, wget-alike, webapi/soap clients,
> benchmarks
> www-servers - http servers, proxy servers, everything related to apache
> www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries
> www (rest, not moved) - html editors, authoring tools, search engines ..
IMHO html editor
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 09:49:39AM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> Hey,
>
> as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
> do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
> largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories
> spinned out. On the ot
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Henk van Oers wrote:
>
> From: Pav Lucistnik
>
> Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100:
> [...]
>>>
>>> Where do you see the dividing line between web apps on one hand and on
>>> the other hand "http servers ... everything related to apache"? IOW,
From: Pav Lucistnik
Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100:
[...]
Where do you see the dividing line between web apps on one hand and on
the other hand "http servers ... everything related to apache"? IOW,
how do I decide if I put a new port into www-webapps or into
www-servers
Matthias Andree píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100:
> Am 19.03.2011 02:49, schrieb Martin Wilke:
> > Hey,
> >
> > as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
> > do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
> > largest with over 2000 individual ports, will ha
Thomas Sandford píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 14:12 +:
> On 19/03/2011 01:49, Martin Wilke wrote:
> > as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
> > do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
> > largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcate
Alex Dupre píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 14:24 +0100:
> Miroslav Lachman ha scritto:
> > Maybe I misunderstand something, but where is Apache or Lighttpd server?
> > I can't find them on the www-server list or www.
>
> Good catch, they aren't in any category :-) but should be in www-server.
Good God,
On Sat 19 Mar 2011 at 12:18:42 PDT Olivier Smedts wrote:
2011/3/19 Michal Varga :
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 09:49 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
Attached is a proposed list of ports being moved from the www category.
Please review, discuss and report ommissions and mistakes. The general
key to the new
2011/3/19 Michal Varga :
> On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 09:49 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
>
>> Attached is a proposed list of ports being moved from the www category.
>> Please review, discuss and report ommissions and mistakes. The general
>> key to the new categories is as follows:
>
> [...]
>
>> www-web
Alex Dupre píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 14:29 +0100:
> Pav Lucistnik ha scritto:
> >> I was wondering where you put httpcore and httpclient, two java
> >> libraries. Even if they are not "webapp", from this categorization I'd
> >> say they should go there, but I found one in "www" and one in
> >> "www
On 3/19/2011 6:09 AM, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Philip M. Gollucci píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 00:51 -0400:
>
>> If might be useful to coordinate this with the default switch from 1.3
>
> No. Let's keep things simple, one thing at a time.
Okay w/ me.
--
-
On 19/03/2011 01:49, Martin Wilke wrote:
as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories
spinned out. On the other side, x11-servers category, with
Pav Lucistnik ha scritto:
I was wondering where you put httpcore and httpclient, two java
libraries. Even if they are not "webapp", from this categorization I'd
say they should go there, but I found one in "www" and one in "www-clients".
Both will be moved to -clients, thanks.
So -clients is
Miroslav Lachman ha scritto:
Maybe I misunderstand something, but where is Apache or Lighttpd server?
I can't find them on the www-server list or www.
Good catch, they aren't in any category :-) but should be in www-server.
--
Alex Dupre
___
freebsd-
Martin Wilke wrote:
[...]
www-servers - http servers, proxy servers, everything related to apache
www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries
www (rest, not moved) - html editors, authoring tools, search engines ..
http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/cat/www-client.txt
http://people.freebsd.org/
Am 19.03.2011 02:49, schrieb Martin Wilke:
> Hey,
>
> as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
> do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
> largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories
> spinned out. On the other side, x11-serve
> devel category is the largest one, how about divide it into :
>
> devel
> devel-perl
> devel-python
>
> wen
Is that not partially why we have the virtual categories to provide language
divisions (not to mention port name prefixes)? I think were devel to be
split 'broad' functionality would be
Alex Dupre píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 08:52 +0100:
> Martin Wilke ha scritto:
> > www-clients - browsers, rss clients, wget-alike, webapi/soap clients,
> > benchmarks
> > www-servers - http servers, proxy servers, everything related to apache
> > www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries
> > www
Philip M. Gollucci píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 00:51 -0400:
> If might be useful to coordinate this with the default switch from 1.3
No. Let's keep things simple, one thing at a time.
--
--
Pav Lucistnik
The use of the lavatory is restricted to the train's cat.
signature.asc
Des
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 04:34:17PM +0800, wen heping wrote:
> devel category is the largest one, how about divide it into :
>
> devel
> devel-perl
> devel-python
My own view is that naming the categories by language (e.g. "java")
is not a good idea. I'd rather divide things up by what they do,
r
devel category is the largest one, how about divide it into :
devel
devel-perl
devel-python
wen
2011/3/19 Martin Wilke :
> Hey,
>
> as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
> do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
> largest with over 2000 individual
Martin Wilke ha scritto:
www-clients - browsers, rss clients, wget-alike, webapi/soap clients,
benchmarks
www-servers - http servers, proxy servers, everything related to apache
www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries
www (rest, not moved) - html editors, authoring tools, search engines ..
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
wrote:
> On 3/19/2011 12:51 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> > On 3/18/2011 9:49 PM, Martin Wilke wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
> >> do some changes to the category layout. The www categor
On 3/19/2011 12:51 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> On 3/18/2011 9:49 PM, Martin Wilke wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
>> do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
>> largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three sub
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
wrote:
> On 3/18/2011 9:49 PM, Martin Wilke wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
> > do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
> > largest with over 2000 individual ports, wi
On 3/18/2011 9:49 PM, Martin Wilke wrote:
> Hey,
>
> as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
> do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
> largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories
> spinned out. On the other side, x11-server
On 3/18/2011 9:49 PM, Martin Wilke wrote:
> Hey,
>
> as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
> do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
> largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories
> spinned out. On the other side, x11-server
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Michal Varga wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 09:49 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
>
>> Attached is a proposed list of ports being moved from the www category.
>> Please review, discuss and report ommissions and mistakes. The general
>> key to the new categories is as fo
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 09:49 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> Attached is a proposed list of ports being moved from the www category.
> Please review, discuss and report ommissions and mistakes. The general
> key to the new categories is as follows:
[...]
> www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, librari
Hey,
as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories
spinned out. On the other side, x11-servers category, with only
10 ports, will be folded into re
57 matches
Mail list logo
