Le 21/11/2016 à 04:25, Bruce Albrecht a écrit :
> I was wondering why the port which is now default is version 5.24-RC4
> instead of 5.24.0? Perl 5.24.0 was released on 2016-05-09 (May 9th).
> Even if RC4 and 5.24.0 have no code differences besides the
> versioning, I fail to understand why you
I was wondering why the port which is now default is version 5.24-RC4
instead of 5.24.0? Perl 5.24.0 was released on 2016-05-09 (May 9th).
Even if RC4 and 5.24.0 have no code differences besides the versioning,
I fail to understand why you would not update the perl 5.24 port to use
the final
On 07/11/2016 06:47, Mark Millard wrote:
> Here is what I found looking back in 5.22 after switching to 5.24:
>
>> > # find /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/mach/5.22/ -print | grep packlist |
>> > more
>> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/mach/5.22/auto/File/Listing/.packlist
>> >
Stefan Ehmann shoesoft at gmx.net on Sun Nov 6 17:51:01 UTC 2016 wrote:
> Sun Nov 6 17:51:01 UTC 2016On 06.11.2016 12:43, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>> On 06.11.2016 12:34, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>> Le 05/11/2016 à 16:00, Andrey Chernov a écrit :
The instruction posted to UPDATING is a bit
On 06.11.2016 12:43, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 06.11.2016 12:34, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>> Le 05/11/2016 à 16:00, Andrey Chernov a écrit :
>>> The instruction posted to UPDATING is a bit incomplete.
>>> Additionlly
>>> portupgrade -f "p5-*"
>>> should run to move all ports still sitting in 5.20
On 06.11.2016 12:34, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Le 05/11/2016 à 16:00, Andrey Chernov a écrit :
>> The instruction posted to UPDATING is a bit incomplete.
>> Additionlly
>> portupgrade -f "p5-*"
>> should run to move all ports still sitting in 5.20 directory, even if
>> they are not depending on perl
Hi,
audio/logitechmediaserver is really not fine with 5.24. How to I set it to use
a previous version in the mean time?
Thanks,
Mark
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe,
On 11/05/16 08:12, Piotr Szafarczyk wrote:
It looks like the same problem I encountered with 5.20 under 10.3 (just
one box). Links are not created during port building (with other than
perl too). With perl, two links are missing under /usr/local/bin.
Creating them manually allows for a
Le 05/11/2016 à 16:00, Andrey Chernov a écrit :
> The instruction posted to UPDATING is a bit incomplete.
> Additionlly
> portupgrade -f "p5-*"
> should run to move all ports still sitting in 5.20 directory, even if
> they are not depending on perl lib.
That should not happen, what ports are
The instruction posted to UPDATING is a bit incomplete.
Additionlly
portupgrade -f "p5-*"
should run to move all ports still sitting in 5.20 directory, even if
they are not depending on perl lib.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On 2016-11-05 15:33, tech-lists wrote:
On 05/11/2016 14:18, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
It's probably caused by pkg not copying hardlinks:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213255
What version of pkg are we using?
Mine is 1.9.3
My problems were because of 1.8.7. With 1.9.3 (and
On 05/11/2016 14:48, tech-lists wrote:
On second thoughts, I don't think it was this because the portupgrade
tool builds a package, removes the old one then installs the new one.
The bug you posted says the problem doesn't happen when one makes the
package.
edit: i think my issue was slightly
On 05/11/2016 14:18, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
It's probably caused by pkg not copying hardlinks:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213255
On second thoughts, I don't think it was this because the portupgrade
tool builds a package, removes the old one then installs the new one.
On 2016-11-05 15:18, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
It's probably caused by pkg not copying hardlinks:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213255
Hi,
Wonderful! This is exactly my problem. Using pkg add installs all the files.
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Piotr
On 05/11/2016 14:18, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
It's probably caused by pkg not copying hardlinks:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213255
What version of pkg are we using?
Mine is 1.9.3
--
J.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 23:00:56 + tech-lists wrote:
> On 04/11/2016 22:58, tech-lists wrote:
>> On 03/11/2016 15:00, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>> Instructions on how to switch are in UPDATING.
>>>
>>> If you do not want to switch, you do not have to do anything.
>>
>> I
On 2016-11-05 14:51, tech-lists wrote:
Everything? Could you try any other port that creates links? Are links
created?
By "links" do you mean "installed usable links into /usr/local/bin"
then yes. A little earlier today I built and installed libreoffice
from ports, without issue.
$ ls -lah
On 05/11/2016 11:46, Piotr Szafarczyk wrote:
Everything? Could you try any other port that creates links? Are links
created?
By "links" do you mean "installed usable links into /usr/local/bin" then
yes. A little earlier today I built and installed libreoffice from
ports, without issue.
$
On 05/11/2016 11:46, Piotr Szafarczyk wrote:
Everything? Could you try any other port that creates links? Are links
created?
Seems so. What port(s) would you like me to try?
--
J.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On 2016-11-05 10:58, tech-lists wrote:
It looks like the same problem I encountered with 5.20 under 10.3 (just
one box). Links are not created during port building (with other than
perl too). With perl, two links are missing under /usr/local/bin.
Creating them manually allows for a successful
On 05/11/2016 07:12, Piotr Szafarczyk wrote:
Hi,
It looks like the same problem I encountered with 5.20 under 10.3 (just
one box). Links are not created during port building (with other than
perl too). With perl, two links are missing under /usr/local/bin.
Creating them manually allows for a
On 2016-11-05 00:00, tech-lists wrote:
On 04/11/2016 22:58, tech-lists wrote:
On 03/11/2016 15:00, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
I followed the instructions in /usr/ports/UPDATING for portupgrade. I
have found that numerous ports will not build:
edit: the error I get now when I try to rebuild an
On 04/11/2016 22:58, tech-lists wrote:
On 03/11/2016 15:00, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Instructions on how to switch are in UPDATING.
If you do not want to switch, you do not have to do anything.
EVERYTHING IS FINE.
-- Mathieu Arnold
Hello,
I followed the instructions in /usr/ports/UPDATING
On 03/11/2016 15:00, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Instructions on how to switch are in UPDATING.
If you do not want to switch, you do not have to do anything.
EVERYTHING IS FINE.
-- Mathieu Arnold
Hello,
I followed the instructions in /usr/ports/UPDATING for portupgrade. I
have found that
On 04/11/2016 15:40, Marko Cupać wrote:
> I guess I came to positive conclusion too early. Everything did
> compile, install and start without problems. But so far I had problems
> with amavisd-new which would die with the following message:
>
> Nov 4 15:20:52 mx1 amavis[38170]: (!)_DIE: Suicide
2016-11-04 15:40, Marko Cupać wrote:
I guess I came to positive conclusion too early. Everything did
compile, install and start without problems. But so far I had problems
with amavisd-new which would die with the following message:
Nov 4 15:20:52 mx1 amavis[38170]: (!)_DIE: Suicide in
On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:41:29 +0100
Marko Cupać wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:00:57 +0100
> Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
> > Instructions on how to switch are in UPDATING.
> >
> > If you do not want to switch, you do not have to do anything.
> >
> >
On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:00:57 +0100
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Instructions on how to switch are in UPDATING.
>
> If you do not want to switch, you do not have to do anything.
>
> EVERYTHING IS FINE.
>
Thank you for the information, upgrade using poudriere and pkg finished
Instructions on how to switch are in UPDATING.
If you do not want to switch, you do not have to do anything.
EVERYTHING IS FINE.
--
Mathieu Arnold
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
29 matches
Mail list logo