Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel!

On 2018-02-19 17:25, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, blubee blubeeme wrote: ... > > For those of us requiring a perl module on a bunch of machines, we don't have > a good mechanism (outside of ports/pkg/poudriere) to build those modules and > get them out.  One of the things

Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel!

Hi! > On 02/19/2018 11:25 AM, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: > > Several of the CPAN modules currently around today don't compile cleanly > > under FreeBSD, but nobody cares because they just use the package which > > has the additional patches. > Do you have a list of those CPAN modules which

Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel!

On 02/19/2018 11:25 AM, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: Several of the CPAN modules currently around today don't compile cleanly under FreeBSD, but nobody cares because they just use the package which has the additional patches. Do you have a list of those CPAN modules which don't compile

Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel!

On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, blubee blubeeme wrote: I agree with this as well, why maintain these ports when they're being maintained upstream. Plus, if we do need patches, they can be applied during the build step. maybe with the ability to add some patches on the way through.. There is just too

Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel!

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Gleb Popov <6year...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Julian Elischer > wrote: > > > On 29/12/17 5:16 am, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 03:54:28AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > >> > >>> 29.12.2017

Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel!

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 29/12/17 5:16 am, Bob Willcox wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 03:54:28AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> >>> 29.12.2017 3:36, Bob Willcox wrote: >>> >>> Does anyone else feel that having 6100 subdirectories

Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel!

On 29/12/17 5:16 am, Bob Willcox wrote: On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 03:54:28AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: 29.12.2017 3:36, Bob Willcox wrote: Does anyone else feel that having 6100 subdirectories (939 are for py-* stuff) is a bit excessive? It is. But py-* stuff has second place only: $ ls

Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel!

On 29/12/17 4:36 am, Bob Willcox wrote: Does anyone else feel that having 6100 subdirectories (939 are for py-* stuff) is a bit excessive? I hadn't really looked at the number of subdirectories there in quite a long time and was shocked to see how meny there are now. yeah we really could do

Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel!

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 04:28:43AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 29.12.2017 4:16, Bob Willcox wrote: > > >> In fact, ports/devel is first but not only category having similar problem > >> with p5-* stuff: > >> > >> $ cd /usr/ports > >> $ find . -type d -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 | while read

Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel!

29.12.2017 4:16, Bob Willcox wrote: >> In fact, ports/devel is first but not only category having similar problem >> with p5-* stuff: >> >> $ cd /usr/ports >> $ find . -type d -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 | while read category; do printf >> "%15s " ${category#./}; ls $category | sed 's/-.*//' | sort

Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel!

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 03:54:28AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 29.12.2017 3:36, Bob Willcox wrote: > > >> Does anyone else feel that having 6100 subdirectories (939 are for py-* > >> stuff) > >> is a bit excessive? > > > > It is. But py-* stuff has second place only: > > > > $ ls

Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel!

29.12.2017 3:36, Bob Willcox wrote: >> Does anyone else feel that having 6100 subdirectories (939 are for py-* >> stuff) >> is a bit excessive? > > It is. But py-* stuff has second place only: > > $ ls /usr/ports/devel | sed 's/-.*//' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head > 1908 p5 > 964 py >

Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel!

29.12.2017 3:36, Bob Willcox wrote: > Does anyone else feel that having 6100 subdirectories (939 are for py-* stuff) > is a bit excessive? It is. But py-* stuff has second place only: $ ls /usr/ports/devel | sed 's/-.*//' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head 1908 p5 964 py 600 rubygem 280 hs

6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel!

Does anyone else feel that having 6100 subdirectories (939 are for py-* stuff) is a bit excessive? I hadn't really looked at the number of subdirectories there in quite a long time and was shocked to see how meny there are now. -- Bob Willcox| If everything is coming your way, you're in the