On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 05:14:29PM -0700, Jack L. wrote:
> Are you using php? Does php -v result in a crash?
>
Yes I use php and
No crash.
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:54 PM Jonathan Chen wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 09:40, The Doctor wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Just recompiled and still
Are you using php? Does php -v result in a crash?
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:54 PM Jonathan Chen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 09:40, The Doctor wrote:
> [...]
> > Just recompiled and still crashing
> >
> > [Tue Apr 02 14:38:55.791536 2019] [core:notice] [pid 33235:tid 34380963840]
> >
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 09:40, The Doctor wrote:
[...]
> Just recompiled and still crashing
>
> [Tue Apr 02 14:38:55.791536 2019] [core:notice] [pid 33235:tid 34380963840]
> AH00052: child pid 33933 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
> [Tue Apr 02 14:38:55.791603 2019] [core:notice] [pid
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 08:48:25AM +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 07:48, The Doctor via freebsd-ports
> wrote:
> >
> > Got a major concern.
> >
> > I upgraded to FreeBSD 12.0 over the weekend.
> >
> > Ports were upgraded correct on the servers.
> >
> > Made an adjustment for
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 07:48, The Doctor via freebsd-ports
wrote:
>
> Got a major concern.
>
> I upgraded to FreeBSD 12.0 over the weekend.
>
> Ports were upgraded correct on the servers.
>
> Made an adjustment for apache 2.4 .
>
> Suddenly one one server httpd is crashing without reason.
>
> Ran
Got a major concern.
I upgraded to FreeBSD 12.0 over the weekend.
Ports were upgraded correct on the servers.
Made an adjustment for apache 2.4 .
Suddenly one one server httpd is crashing without reason.
Ran gbd it turns out a module in devel/apr1 might be at issue.
Can we get consistency?
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:02:18PM +, Carmel NY wrote:
> I just updated my system and installed the "security/py-certbot-apache" port
> using "synth". The installation went fine. The problem now is when I attempt
> to run "certbot" it fails. The err
I just updated my system and installed the "security/py-certbot-apache" port
using "synth". The installation went fine. The problem now is when I attempt
to run "certbot" it fails. The error log is below. I was forced to remove the
py-certbot-apache port in order to g
On Tuesday 09 Sep 2014 08:09:10 Vick Khera wrote:
Thanks. This seems to be working. Should I file a bug report? It
seems to me that the DEFAULT_VERSIONS ought to be sufficient.
Things have changed. It looks like it got fixed with version 367897 of
Mk/bsd.apache.mk on September 10.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Mike Clarke jmc-freeb...@milibyte.co.uk wrote:
APACHE_PORT=www/apache22
Thanks. This seems to be working. Should I file a bug report? It seems
to me that the DEFAULT_VERSIONS ought to be sufficient.
___
My recent run of poudriere to build my package collection rebuilt all
my apache dependents against 2.4. I knew this was coming, so had set
in my poudriere make.conf the following:
DEFAULT_VERSIONS=mysql=5.5 pgsql=9.2 apache=2.2 perl5=5.16
However, that seems to be ignored. The build logs do show
On Monday 08 Sep 2014 15:52:17 Vick Khera wrote:
My recent run of poudriere to build my package collection rebuilt
all my apache dependents against 2.4. I knew this was coming, so had
set in my poudriere make.conf the following:
DEFAULT_VERSIONS=mysql=5.5 pgsql=9.2 apache=2.2 perl5=5.16
Olli Hauer:
Hi Jos,
it's easy, even quickly overseen DBD != BDB
AUTHN_DBD and DBD are SQL modules and this apache options are only
valid if APR was build with MYSQL, PGSQL or SQLITE support.
In the past we ask the user to specify if APR was build with SQL
support, now the port checks the
Olli,
This is my current setup of Apache:
=== The following configuration options are available for
apache22-2.2.22_8:
AUTH_BASIC=on: mod_auth_basic
AUTH_DIGEST=on: mod_auth_digest
AUTHN_ALIAS=on: mod_authn_alias
AUTHN_ANON=on: mod_authn_anon
AUTHN_DBD=on: mod_authn_dbd
Sorry, it should work as there is a symbolic link for the one you are
searching for...
Really don't understand why I still get the port is IGNORED line on
portupgrade -a
Jos
Jos Chrispijn:
Olli,
This is my current setup of Apache:
=== The following configuration options are available for
On 2012-09-09 12:58, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Sorry, it should work as there is a symbolic link for the one you are
searching for...
Really don't understand why I still get the port is IGNORED line on
portupgrade -a
Jos
Jos Chrispijn:
Olli,
This is my current setup of Apache:
=== The
Just updating Apache22 (apache-2.2.22_6) and get this error:
Port marked as IGNORE: www/apache22:
AUTHN_DBD and DBD requires APR-util to have DBD support build in.
Please rebuild APR at last with one DBD backend
The issue is that I did config APR with DBD support.
Currently have
On 2012-09-08 16:22, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Just updating Apache22 (apache-2.2.22_6) and get this error:
Port marked as IGNORE: www/apache22:
AUTHN_DBD and DBD requires APR-util to have DBD support build in.
Please rebuild APR at last with one DBD backend
The issue is that I did
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2012-09-08 16:22, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Just updating Apache22 (apache-2.2.22_6) and get this error:
Port marked as IGNORE: www/apache22:
AUTHN_DBD and DBD requires APR-util to have DBD support build in.
Please rebuild APR at last with one DBD
On 2012-09-08 17:58, Warren Block wrote:
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2012-09-08 16:22, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Just updating Apache22 (apache-2.2.22_6) and get this error:
Port marked as IGNORE: www/apache22:
AUTHN_DBD and DBD requires APR-util to have DBD support build in.
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2012-09-08 17:58, Warren Block wrote:
How about adding mention of SQL in the IGNORE message?
I will rewrite the message to
Please rebuild APR at last with one DBD backend (MYSQL, PGSQL or SQLITE)
Hope then is is more clear.
That is much better.
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 10:57:35 -0600 (MDT)
Warren Block articulated:
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2012-09-08 17:58, Warren Block wrote:
How about adding mention of SQL in the IGNORE message?
I will rewrite the message to
Please rebuild APR at last with one DBD backend
On 2012-09-09 00:48, Jerry wrote:
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 10:57:35 -0600 (MDT)
Warren Block articulated:
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2012-09-08 17:58, Warren Block wrote:
How about adding mention of SQL in the IGNORE message?
I will rewrite the message to
Please rebuild APR at
be a good idea to add one. In the past when
I've changed variable names in my ports I've added compatibility
shims for about 6 months, then warnings for another 6, then dropped
support for the old names.
It only fails if you use WITH_BDB_VER to set WITH_BERKELEYDB for the
apache port like I
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 09:36:55PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
It seems that the recent changes to the apache20 port Makefile.modules
has broken how I've been configuring my systems.
In my make.conf file I have globally set the following:
WITH_BDB_VER=43
which instructs many ports
Clement Laforet wrote:
WITH_BERKELEYDB is now deprecated in favor of WITH_BDB in order to
make BDB support consistent with the rest of the ports tree.
Is there a warning generated for users that have the old one defined? If
not it would be a good idea to add one. In the past when I've
It seems that the recent changes to the apache20 port Makefile.modules
has broken how I've been configuring my systems.
In my make.conf file I have globally set the following:
WITH_BDB_VER=43
which instructs many ports to use that version of Berkeley DB.
Furtnermore, in my apache
27 matches
Mail list logo
