Chris Rees wrote:
On 19 August 2011 11:18, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
Boris Samorodov wrote:
You may try to reduce pkg-plist changes. Are you speaking about
www/typo* ports? If yes, those ports have hardcoded PORTVERSION
at pkg-plist. One can use make variables to
Mark Linimon wrote:
Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately.
GNATS has a spamcatcher for 500k messages (mostly this catches
viruses). Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup
process runs, but I forgot to do it this time. (I only took a
glance.)
On 19 August 2011 08:55, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
Mark Linimon wrote:
Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately.
GNATS has a spamcatcher for 500k messages (mostly this catches
viruses). Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup
process runs,
Hi!
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 + (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote:
I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be
avoided´at most costs.
Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a SPAM Filter or at
least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I
Chris Rees wrote:
On 19 August 2011 08:55, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
Mark Linimon wrote:
Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately.
GNATS has a spamcatcher for 500k messages (mostly this catches
viruses). Normally I handle such PRs manually before
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 + (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote:
I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be
avoided´at most costs.
Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a SPAM Filter or at
least take 2 days until I get reply.
On 19 August 2011 11:18, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 + (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote:
I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be
avoided´at most costs.
Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked
Hi,
I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be
avoided´at most costs.
Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a SPAM Filter or at
least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I submitted the
patches on tuesday.
So, what should I do? Still create full
On 18 August 2011 20:11, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be
avoided´at most costs.
Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a SPAM Filter or at
least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I
Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately.
GNATS has a spamcatcher for 500k messages (mostly this catches viruses).
Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup process runs, but
I forgot to do it this time. (I only took a glance.)
Does the plist change
10 matches
Mail list logo
