Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-06 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Jim Ohlstein wrote: Hello, On 4/6/16 12:39 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: +--On 6 avril 2016 12:00:47 -0400 Jim Ohlstein wrote: | Hello, | |> On Apr 6, 2016, at 11:37 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: |> |> +--On 6 avril 2016 10:06:41 -0400 Jim Ohlstein

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-06 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! This is much ado about nothing. The "WITH_OPENSSL_PORT" option is there for just this purpose and is used in many ports. In 9.x this is sometimes a problem, if port X builds in variant 1 and port Y depends/links on X, but builds in variant 2. So it's a temporary

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-06 Thread Jim Ohlstein
Hello, On 4/6/16 12:39 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: +--On 6 avril 2016 12:00:47 -0400 Jim Ohlstein wrote: | Hello, | |> On Apr 6, 2016, at 11:37 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: |> |> +--On 6 avril 2016 10:06:41 -0400 Jim Ohlstein wrote: |> | Hello, |>

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-06 Thread Mathieu Arnold
+--On 6 avril 2016 12:00:47 -0400 Jim Ohlstein wrote: | Hello, | |> On Apr 6, 2016, at 11:37 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: |> |> +--On 6 avril 2016 10:06:41 -0400 Jim Ohlstein wrote: |> | Hello, |> | |> | On 4/6/16 12:44 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: |>

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-06 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Kurt Jaeger (li...@opsec.eu): > In 9.x this is sometimes a problem, if port X builds in variant 1 > and port Y depends/links on X, but builds in variant 2. So it's > a temporary solution for 9.x and will be solved when 9.x is EOL'ed. We have also seen that problem on 10.x:

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-06 Thread Jim Ohlstein
Hello, > On Apr 6, 2016, at 11:37 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > +--On 6 avril 2016 10:06:41 -0400 Jim Ohlstein wrote: > | Hello, > | > | On 4/6/16 12:44 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > |> Hi! > |> > |>> Actually, I just noticed (when compiling the port), that the

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-06 Thread Mathieu Arnold
+--On 6 avril 2016 10:06:41 -0400 Jim Ohlstein wrote: | Hello, | | On 4/6/16 12:44 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: |> Hi! |> |>> Actually, I just noticed (when compiling the port), that the Makefile |>> now says: |>> |>> WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes |> |> Yes, sorry, my fault. Fixed, and as

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-06 Thread Jim Ohlstein
Hello, > On Apr 6, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Hi! > >> This is much ado about nothing. The "WITH_OPENSSL_PORT" option is there >> for just this purpose and is used in many ports. > > In 9.x this is sometimes a problem, if port X builds in variant 1 > and port Y

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-06 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > This is much ado about nothing. The "WITH_OPENSSL_PORT" option is there > for just this purpose and is used in many ports. In 9.x this is sometimes a problem, if port X builds in variant 1 and port Y depends/links on X, but builds in variant 2. So it's a temporary solution for 9.x and

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-06 Thread Jim Ohlstein
Hello, On 4/6/16 12:44 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! Actually, I just noticed (when compiling the port), that the Makefile now says: WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes Yes, sorry, my fault. Fixed, and as suggested by mat: It is now as IGNORE with a message explaining how to do it for 9.x. This is much

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-06 Thread Mathieu Arnold
+--On 6 avril 2016 07:33:50 +0200 Michelle Sullivan wrote: | Kurt Jaeger wrote: |> Hi! |> |>> Actually, I just noticed (when compiling the port), that the Makefile |>> now says: |>> |>> WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes |> Yes, sorry, my fault. Fixed, and as suggested by mat: It is |>

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-05 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! Actually, I just noticed (when compiling the port), that the Makefile now says: WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes Yes, sorry, my fault. Fixed, and as suggested by mat: It is now as IGNORE with a message explaining how to do it for 9.x. Not sure about the IGNORE vs BROKEN but

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-05 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > Actually, I just noticed (when compiling the port), that the Makefile now > says: > > WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes Yes, sorry, my fault. Fixed, and as suggested by mat: It is now as IGNORE with a message explaining how to do it for 9.x. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-05 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Martin Waschbüsch wrote: Umm probably a really bad idea... consider this or something more creative/descriptive: .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100 && ${WITH_OPENSSL_PORT} != "yes" BROKEN= You must set WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes in /etc/make.conf on Pre 10.x .endif ...

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-05 Thread Martin Waschbüsch
> Umm probably a really bad idea... consider this or something more > creative/descriptive: > > .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100 && ${WITH_OPENSSL_PORT} != > "yes" > BROKEN= You must set WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes in /etc/make.conf on > Pre 10.x > .endif > > > ...

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-05 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! I'm testbuilding those ports right now and find that they fail on 9.3amd64 with: With this in the -server Makefile, all is fine. .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100 WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes .endif Umm probably a really bad idea... consider this or

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-05 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! Could someone please have a look at this one. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208029 All patches got approval from the maintainer. For all I can see this should be ready to be committed. If I overlooked anything or more information is needed, please

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-05 Thread Martin Waschbüsch
> Am 05.04.2016 um 22:15 schrieb Kurt Jaeger : > > Hi! > >> Could someone please have a look at this one. >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208029 >> >> All patches got approval from the maintainer. >> For all I can see this should be ready to be committed. >

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-05 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > Could someone please have a look at this one. > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208029 > > All patches got approval from the maintainer. > For all I can see this should be ready to be committed. Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-05 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I'm testbuilding those ports right now and find that > they fail on 9.3amd64 with: With this in the -server Makefile, all is fine. .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100 WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes .endif -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-05 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I'm testbuilding those ports right now and find that > they fail on 9.3amd64 with: > > checking for OpenSSL support... yes > configure: error: OpenSSL library version requirement not met (>= 1.0.1) > > So it seems that OpenSSL and 9.3amd64 do not build ? Should the > default for 9.3

Re: Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-05 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > Could someone please have a look at this one. > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208029 > > All patches got approval from the maintainer. > For all I can see this should be ready to be committed. > > If I overlooked anything or more information is needed, > please let me

Committer needed for PR 208029

2016-04-05 Thread Martin Waschbüsch
Hi all, Could someone please have a look at this one. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208029 All patches got approval from the maintainer. For all I can see this should be ready to be committed. If I overlooked anything or more information is needed, please let me know and