On 08/12/14 14:11, Patrick Powell wrote:
On 08/09/14 18:15, Naram Qashat wrote:
On 08/09/14 19:45, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Naram Qashat cyberb...@cyberbotx.com wrote:
On 08/04/14 07:28, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 07:09:33AM -0400, Naram Qashat
On 08/09/14 18:15, Naram Qashat wrote:
On 08/09/14 19:45, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Naram Qashat
cyberb...@cyberbotx.com wrote:
On 08/04/14 07:28, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 07:09:33AM -0400, Naram Qashat wrote:
On 08/03/14 22:14, David
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Naram Qashat cyberb...@cyberbotx.com wrote:
On 08/04/14 07:28, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 07:09:33AM -0400, Naram Qashat wrote:
On 08/03/14 22:14, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 10:10:27PM -0400, Naram Qashat wrote:
...
On 08/09/14 19:45, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Naram Qashat cyberb...@cyberbotx.com wrote:
On 08/04/14 07:28, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 07:09:33AM -0400, Naram Qashat wrote:
On 08/03/14 22:14, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at
On 08/04/14 07:28, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 07:09:33AM -0400, Naram Qashat wrote:
On 08/03/14 22:14, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 10:10:27PM -0400, Naram Qashat wrote:
...
If there is
a way to find out when any process is attempting to modify a file,
On 08/03/14 22:14, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 10:10:27PM -0400, Naram Qashat wrote:
...
If there is
a way to find out when any process is attempting to modify a file, that would
probably help me narrow it down, but I'm not aware of anything that can do that,
...
Well,
On Sun, 03 Aug 2014 16:27:36 -0400
Naram Qashat cyberb...@cyberbotx.com wrote:
On 08/03/14 15:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 03/08/2014 20:34, Naram Qashat wrote:
Well, I've been using the command line arguments of -voL '=', and
looking at the man page for pkg-version, as far as I can tell,
On 08/04/14 15:41, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Sun, 03 Aug 2014 16:27:36 -0400
Naram Qashat cyberb...@cyberbotx.com wrote:
On 08/03/14 15:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 03/08/2014 20:34, Naram Qashat wrote:
Well, I've been using the command line arguments of -voL '=', and
looking at the man
I've been noticing this whenever I do a 'pkg version -v', it shows some ports as
being different from the INDEX, but when I check the actual port, it isn't the
same version that 'pkg version' shows. I usually rebuild my INDEX manually after
doing an svn update, so I'm wondering if this is pkg
On 08/03/14 14:57, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 03/08/2014 18:33, Naram Qashat wrote:
I've been noticing this whenever I do a 'pkg version -v', it shows some
ports as being different from the INDEX, but when I check the actual
port, it isn't the same version that 'pkg version' shows. I usually
On 03/08/2014 20:34, Naram Qashat wrote:
Well, I've been using the command line arguments of -voL '=', and
looking at the man page for pkg-version, as far as I can tell, it
shouldn't be downloading INDEX, since I do have INDEX-9 on my system.
pkg(8) doesn't download or attempt to build an
On 08/03/14 15:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 03/08/2014 20:34, Naram Qashat wrote:
Well, I've been using the command line arguments of -voL '=', and
looking at the man page for pkg-version, as far as I can tell, it
shouldn't be downloading INDEX, since I do have INDEX-9 on my system.
pkg(8)
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Naram Qashat cyberb...@cyberbotx.com
wrote:
On 08/03/14 15:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 03/08/2014 20:34, Naram Qashat wrote:
Well, I've been using the command line arguments of -voL '=', and
looking at the man page for pkg-version, as far as I can tell, it
On 08/03/14 21:24, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Naram Qashat cyberb...@cyberbotx.com
mailto:cyberb...@cyberbotx.com wrote:
On 08/03/14 15:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 03/08/2014 20:34, Naram Qashat wrote:
Well, I've been using the command line
14 matches
Mail list logo
