Hi Alex
On Thursday 05 Nov 2009 15:39:20 Oliver Schonrock wrote:
You are probably aware of the discussion
here:http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=5132
Do you plan to create a php53 set of ports or just update the php5 set?
How far have you got?
Obviously since then we have had
Oliver Schonrock wrote:
Hi Alex
On Thursday 05 Nov 2009 15:39:20 Oliver Schonrock wrote:
You are probably aware of the discussion
here:http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=5132
Do you plan to create a php53 set of ports or just update the php5 set?
How far have you got?
Obviously
Hi Alex,
So you don't plan to leave 5.2.x version in ports for people who need to
maintain servers in production with many clients and many 'old' web
applications?
Like we don't have ports for php 5.0 and 5.1, I'll not maintain ports
for 5.2 when the switchover will take place.
I don't
Miroslav Lachman пишет:
Seriously - if ports team is willing to have legacy versions in ports,
we need to discuss some rules for this work. Not just for PHP, but more
general. In which conditions we need/allow them, the naming conventions
(some ports already have more versions but names are
Doug Barton wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Even if there are just a few incompatibilities, it means some clients
applications on webhosting will stop working and clients will scream on
helpline right after the update of the servers PHP...
Sounds like you're familiar with the problems, why
