Greetings,
The time has now come to remove these db4* ports, Berkeley DB versions
4.0 to 4.7, inclusively. Most of their dependent ports can cope with
upgrades to db48, db5, or db6, most of the others could be patched to work.
I will wait a few hours after this announcement has appeared on the
l
On 2014-Aug-21 20:56:47 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
>The time has now come to remove these db4* ports, Berkeley DB versions
>4.0 to 4.7, inclusively. Most of their dependent ports can cope with
>upgrades to db48, db5, or db6, most of the others could be patched to work.
...
>I have created a Wi
Hi!
> If you have further questions, please ask them on the freebsd-ports@
> mailing list, and feel free to Cc: me, but do make sure your mailer does
> not break threading, and do keep the Subject line intact.
For devel/ice:
If I run portupgrade, it says:
cannot install: no eligible BerkeleyDB
> On 24 Aug 2014, at 12:28, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> If you have further questions, please ask them on the freebsd-ports@
>> mailing list, and feel free to Cc: me, but do make sure your mailer does
>> not break threading, and do keep the Subject line intact.
>
> For devel/ice:
>
> If
Hi!
> > For devel/ice:
[...]
> Is this exclusive to portupgrade (does "make install" work)? Ice
> only supports bdb 5, so the Makefile should be correct.
No, it's not exclusive. Same behaviour with
# make
===> Ice-3.5.1_1 cannot install: no eligible BerkeleyDB version. Requested: 6,
incompatib
On 2014-08-24 13:11, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> For devel/ice:
> [...]
>> Is this exclusive to portupgrade (does "make install" work)? Ice
>> only supports bdb 5, so the Makefile should be correct.
>
> No, it's not exclusive. Same behaviour with
>
> # make
> ===> Ice-3.5.1_1 cannot install:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:39:06 +0200
olli hauer wrote:
> On 2014-08-24 13:11, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >>> For devel/ice:
> > [...]
> >> Is this exclusive to portupgrade (does "make install" work)? Ice
> >> only supports bdb 5, so the Makefile should be correct.
> >
> > No, it's not exc
Hi!
> > Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks wrong to me in devel/ice.
> >
> > Can you test the following patch.
> >
> > Index: Makefile
> > ===
> > --- devel/ice/Makefile(revision 365910)
> > +++ devel/ice/Makefile(working copy)
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks wrong to me in devel/ice.
> > >
> > > Can you test the following patch.
> > >
> > > Index: Makefile
> > > ===
> > > --- devel/ic
On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200
> Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks wrong to me in devel/ice.
Can you test the following patch.
Index: Makefile
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:08:07 +0200
olli hauer wrote:
> On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200
> > Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks wrong to me in devel/ice.
>
> Can you test the following
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:08:07 +0200
olli hauer wrote:
> On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200
> > Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks wrong to me in devel/ice.
>
> Can you test the following
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:08:07 +0200
olli hauer wrote:
> On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200
> > Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks wrong to me in devel/ice.
>
> Can you test the following p
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:36:18 +0200
Michael Gmelin wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:08:07 +0200
> olli hauer wrote:
>
> > On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200
> > > Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi!
> > >>
> > Hm, using USE_BDB
On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 15:08 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200
> > Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks wrong to me in devel/ice.
>
> Can you test the following pat
Hi!
> > > Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks wrong to me in devel/ice.
[...]
> > > USES= iconv gmake
> > > -USE_BDB= 5
> > > +USE_BDB= yes
> > > +WANT_BDB_VER= 5
> > > INVALID_BDB_VER= 40 41 42 43 44 46 47 48
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> @Olli: Checking Mk/bsd.databasemk it seems like you're right. It's
> quite amusing how this went unnoticed for so long, it has been in
> there for eight years :)
>
As the original author of the USE_BDB code, the USE_BDB=5 had worked
in the
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:59:37 -0500
Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Michael Gmelin
> wrote:
> > @Olli: Checking Mk/bsd.databasemk it seems like you're right. It's
> > quite amusing how this went unnoticed for so long, it has been in
> > there for eight years :)
> >
>
> As
Hi!
There is the possible mechanism of
WITH_BDB_VER=6
in /etc/make.conf.
Is there a way to also add some
DEFAULT_VERSIONS= bdb=6
like syntax in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk to keep the
mechanism similar to other "default versions" ?
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:59:37 -0500
> Scot Hetzel wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Michael Gmelin
>> wrote:
>> > @Olli: Checking Mk/bsd.databasemk it seems like you're right. It's
>> > quite amusing how this went unnoticed
On 24. August 2014 15:36:18 MESZ, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:08:07 +0200
>olli hauer wrote:
>
>> On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200
>> > Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks
On 24. August 2014 21:55:40 MESZ, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>Hi!
>
>There is the possible mechanism of
>
>WITH_BDB_VER=6
>
>in /etc/make.conf.
>
>Is there a way to also add some
>
>DEFAULT_VERSIONS= bdb=6
>
>like syntax in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk to keep the
>mechanism similar to other "def
On 24. August 2014 16:46:17 MESZ, Dennis Glatting wrote:
>On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 15:08 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
>> On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200
>> > Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks wr
On 25. August 2014 07:57:36 MESZ, Scot Hetzel wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Michael Gmelin
>wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:59:37 -0500
>> Scot Hetzel wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Michael Gmelin
>>> wrote:
>>> > @Olli: Checking Mk/bsd.databasemk it seems lik
>> On 25 Aug 2014, at 12:00, Matthias Andree wrote:
>>
>> On 24. August 2014 15:36:18 MESZ, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:08:07 +0200
>> olli hauer wrote:
>>
On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200
Kurt Jaeger
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
> On 25. August 2014 07:57:36 MESZ, Scot Hetzel wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Michael Gmelin
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:59:37 -0500
>>> Scot Hetzel wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 7:20 AM,
Am 24.08.2014 um 01:06 schrieb Peter Jeremy:
> On 2014-Aug-21 20:56:47 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
>> The time has now come to remove these db4* ports, Berkeley DB versions
>> 4.0 to 4.7, inclusively. Most of their dependent ports can cope with
>> upgrades to db48, db5, or db6, most of the othe
Am 25.08.2014 um 07:57 schrieb Scot Hetzel:
[...]
> I was also thinking that we should make WITH_BDB_HIGHEST the default.
> It is used by VER+ when multiple versions of bdb are installed. That
> way we can remove this variable also.
I filed two Bugzilla bugs, 193000 and 193002 to keep track of
28 matches
Mail list logo
