On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:12:22 -0500, martinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
martinko wrote:
mato wrote:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:42:41 -0400, Michael Johnson wrote
On 10/15/06, martinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello and thanks for your hard work!
I've been using WITH_GECKO=seamonkey (and
martinko wrote:
mato wrote:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:42:41 -0400, Michael Johnson wrote
On 10/15/06, martinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello and thanks for your hard work!
I've been using WITH_GECKO=seamonkey (and WITH_MOZILLA=seamonkey) and
now when trying to
martinko writes:
epiphany is using seamonkey for gecko support, but you can
change that by defining WITH_GECKO to the following values:
firefox
mozilla
seamonkey
firefox-devel
xulrunner
I don't know who's responsible, but I'd like to profusely thank
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 05:42 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
The FreeBSD GNOME Team is proud to announce that GNOME 2.16.1 has been
imported into the ports tree in time for FreeBSD 6.2.
Has anyone succeeded in compiling Metacity 2.16.3 with
--enable-compositor? From the looks of it, it should
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 08:57 -0500, Frank Knobbe wrote:
Has anyone succeeded in compiling Metacity 2.16.3 with
--enable-compositor? From the looks of it, it should find all the
required extensions in /usr/X11R6/libdata/pkconfig. The only one missing
appears to be cm.pc, the info for a composite
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:42:41 -0400, Michael Johnson wrote
On 10/15/06, martinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello and thanks for your hard work!
I've been using WITH_GECKO=seamonkey (and WITH_MOZILLA=seamonkey) and
now when trying to install new Gnome (after uninstalling nearly
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
The FreeBSD GNOME Team is proud to announce that GNOME 2.16.1 has been
imported into the ports tree in time for FreeBSD 6.2. This is a first.
Usually the GNOME release cycle has conflicted with the FreeBSD release
cycle. However, thanks to Kris and pointyhat, we were
The FreeBSD GNOME Team is proud to announce that GNOME 2.16.1 has been
imported into the ports tree in time for FreeBSD 6.2. This is a first.
Usually the GNOME release cycle has conflicted with the FreeBSD release
cycle. However, thanks to Kris and pointyhat, we were able to get the
major patch
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 05:42:41 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
The FreeBSD GNOME Team is proud to announce that GNOME 2.16.1 has been
imported into the ports tree in time for FreeBSD 6.2. This is a first.
Usually the GNOME release cycle has conflicted with the FreeBSD release
cycle. However,
Oops, I found a problem in print/freetype2.
Please add missing #.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/print/freetype2/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.75
diff -u -r1.75 Makefile
--- Makefile14 Oct 2006
Oops, I found a problem in print/freetype2. Please add missing #.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/print/freetype2/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.75
diff -u -r1.75 Makefile
--- Makefile14 Oct 2006
Bravo, I know the team had to do a lot of work to get this in before
6.2,
so great job everyone!
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 05:42 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
The FreeBSD GNOME Team is proud to announce that GNOME 2.16.1 has been
imported into the ports tree in time for FreeBSD 6.2. This is a
Is there an upgrade script or do we just do a portupgrade?
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 10:52 -0500, Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
Bravo, I know the team had to do a lot of work to get this in before
6.2,
so great job everyone!
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 05:42 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
The
Nevermind, I'm sure the directions are the same as 2.14 listed
on the www.freebsd.org/Gnome
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 11:48 -0500, Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
Is there an upgrade script or do we just do a portupgrade?
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 10:52 -0500, Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
Bravo, I know
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 11:48 -0500, Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
Is there an upgrade script or do we just do a portupgrade?
As with every major upgrade (GNOME or otherwise)
consult /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Joe
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 10:52 -0500, Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
Bravo, I know the team
On 10/14/06, John Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like ports/UPDATING is mixing sysutils/portmanager and
portmaster in the 20061014 part that tells how to update gnome. Is
that on purpose?
it's not mixing, it's giving you the option to use portmaster OR portmanager.
John
--
John Hay
On Saturday 14 October 2006 21:14, John Hay wrote:
It looks like ports/UPDATING is mixing sysutils/portmanager and
portmaster in the 20061014 part that tells how to update gnome. Is
that on purpose?
The instuctions are for portmaster; the mention of sysutils/portmanager looks
like a typo.
John Hay wrote:
It looks like ports/UPDATING is mixing sysutils/portmanager and
portmaster in the 20061014 part that tells how to update gnome. Is
that on purpose?
The entry says this:
20061014:
AFFECTS: All GNOME users
AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GNOME has been updated to 2.16 and all
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 23:54:08 -0500, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Hay wrote:
It looks like ports/UPDATING is mixing sysutils/portmanager and
portmaster in the 20061014 part that tells how to update gnome. Is
that on purpose?
The entry says this:
20061014:
AFFECTS: All GNOME
19 matches
Mail list logo
