The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
The port's Makefile properly conditionalizes on it, but pkg-plist does not.
How do I conditionalize ppk-list on NOPORTDOCS=yes?
Makefile:
.if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
@${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR}
${INSTALL_DATA}
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:05:28AM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
The port's Makefile properly conditionalizes on it, but pkg-plist does not.
How do I conditionalize ppk-list on NOPORTDOCS=yes?
Makefile:
.if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
The port's Makefile properly conditionalizes on it, but pkg-plist
does not.
How do I conditionalize ppk-list on NOPORTDOCS=yes?
Makefile:
.if
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
[ .. ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:52:57AM +0200:
Hi,
BTW, you got the same error in two other BotMails (at least):
From: [EMAIL
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:57:17PM +0200:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
[ .. ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:52:57AM +0200:
Hi,
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:57:17PM +0200:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
[ ..
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x
http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/
The
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:28:37PM +0200:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x,
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:35:45 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:28:37PM +0200:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Cracauer wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:28:37PM +0200:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
problem: it's a
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x
http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/
The 6.3 will run everywhere. Should I just use that one? Do you want
me
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:30:33PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x
http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/
The
Wesley Shields wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:36:23PM -0500:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:30:33PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:38:52PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
Wesley Shields wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:36:23PM -0500:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:30:33PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
problem: it's a binary
14 matches
Mail list logo
