Re: LICENSE questions

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:15:28 +0200 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 04/10/2016 à 14:03, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit : > > On 10/04/2016 06:47 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> Le 04/10/2016 à 09:29, Eitan Adler a écrit : > >>> On 4 October 2016 at 00:25, Mathieu Arnold

Re: LICENSE questions

Le 04/10/2016 à 14:03, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit : > On 10/04/2016 06:47 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> Le 04/10/2016 à 09:29, Eitan Adler a écrit : >>> On 4 October 2016 at 00:25, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 04/10/2016 à 03:58, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit : >

Re: LICENSE questions

On 10/04/2016 06:47 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 04/10/2016 à 09:29, Eitan Adler a écrit : >> On 4 October 2016 at 00:25, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >>> Le 04/10/2016 à 03:58, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit : Could we use USES=metaport to suppress these messages? >>>

Re: LICENSE questions

Le 04/10/2016 à 09:29, Eitan Adler a écrit : > On 4 October 2016 at 00:25, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> Le 04/10/2016 à 03:58, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit : >>> On 10/03/2016 07:34 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: On 3 October 2016 at 05:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen

Re: LICENSE questions

On 4 October 2016 at 00:25, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 04/10/2016 à 03:58, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit : >> On 10/03/2016 07:34 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> On 3 October 2016 at 05:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen >>> wrote: On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM,

Re: LICENSE questions

Le 04/10/2016 à 03:58, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit : > On 10/03/2016 07:34 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On 3 October 2016 at 05:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen >> wrote: >>> On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith,

Re: LICENSE questions

On 10/03/2016 07:34 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 3 October 2016 at 05:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen > wrote: >> On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen >>> wrote: So I have a couple of

Re: LICENSE questions

Le 03/10/2016 à 14:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit : > On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen >> wrote: >>> So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have >>> licenses I can't find

Re: LICENSE questions

On 3 October 2016 at 05:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: > On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen >> wrote: >>> So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have

Re: LICENSE questions

On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen > wrote: >> So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have >> licenses I can't find in Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk. How do I set LICENSE in >> those ports?

Re: LICENSE questions

On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: > So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have > licenses I can't find in Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk. How do I set LICENSE in > those ports? The other answers are correct. If the license is

Re: LICENSE questions

On Sun, 2 Oct 2016 18:44:43 + "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" wrote: > So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which > have licenses I can't find in Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk. How do I set > LICENSE in those ports? Like this example: LICENSE=

Re: LICENSE questions

On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen < step...@missouri.edu> wrote: > So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have > licenses I can't find in Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk. How do I set LICENSE in > those ports? > > An even tougher one is

LICENSE questions

So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have licenses I can't find in Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk. How do I set LICENSE in those ports? An even tougher one is math/octave-forge-optim, where each individual file has its own license.

Re: LICENSE questions

Hi, On Jun 15, 2010, at 01:10, Doug Barton wrote: My vote would be that we add a PERL category, but maybe there is a reason not to do this? I would like to second this vote. Unless somebody is already working on this(?) I will try and come up with a patch. Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix

LICENSE questions

I'm working on adding LICENSE information to my ports, and have a few questions. A lot of my ports are ISC products, and they have the following: http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/COPYRIGHT.txt I also have dns/fpdns which has this: http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/LICENSE.txt which looks like

Re: LICENSE questions

On 06/14/10 08:05, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: Doug Barton writes: [...] Then there is security/libassuan which seems to be dual licensed under GPLv3 and LGPLv2, did we ever decide how to handle that? In one of the dual-licensed port's Makefile, I added: #v+ LICENSE= GPLv3 LGPL3

Re: LICENSE questions

On 06/14/10 09:59, Chuck Swiger wrote: Hi-- On Jun 14, 2010, at 1:07 AM, Doug Barton wrote: I'm working on adding LICENSE information to my ports, and have a few questions. A lot of my ports are ISC products, and they have the following: http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/COPYRIGHT.txt Yes,

Re: LICENSE questions

Hi-- On Jun 14, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Doug Barton wrote: On 06/14/10 09:59, Chuck Swiger wrote: On Jun 14, 2010, at 1:07 AM, Doug Barton wrote: I'm working on adding LICENSE information to my ports, and have a few questions. A lot of my ports are ISC products, and they have the following:

Re: LICENSE questions

This LICENSE stuff is beginning to look more complex than it seemed at first. From this thread I gather that maintainers are going to have to do a bit more than simply check a box. Here, for example, we see some well-known licenses that don't readily identify themselves as such. How can a