On 2/17/2016 12:25 AM, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> Am 16.02.2016 um 20:23 schrieb Douglas Thrift:
>> While your arguments for user isolation make sense, they really only
>> make sense if you were to be using gitolite or gitosis at the same time
>> as gogs which I imagine would not be that common. I a
Am 16.02.2016 um 20:23 schrieb Douglas Thrift:
While your arguments for user isolation make sense, they really only
make sense if you were to be using gitolite or gitosis at the same time
as gogs which I imagine would not be that common. I am not opposed to
you having a gogs user on your system,
On 2/16/2016 12:19 AM, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> Am 16.02.2016 um 00:09 schrieb Douglas Thrift:
>> I mentioned this already on that ticket, but why use the user "gogs"
>> instead of "git" which is already used by the gitosis and gitolite
>> ports? That seems like a more standard thing to see in you
Am 16.02.2016 um 12:04 schrieb Kurt Jaeger:
Done.
Thanks a lot!
Gruß
Matthias
--
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to
produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning."
Hi!
> Am 16.02.2016 um 00:09 schrieb Douglas Thrift:
> > I mentioned this already on that ticket, but why use the user "gogs"
> > instead of "git" which is already used by the gitosis and gitolite
> > ports? That seems like a more standard thing to see in your git urls:
> >
> > git clone g...@exam
Am 16.02.2016 um 00:09 schrieb Douglas Thrift:
I mentioned this already on that ticket, but why use the user "gogs"
instead of "git" which is already used by the gitosis and gitolite
ports? That seems like a more standard thing to see in your git urls:
git clone g...@example.com vs git clone g..
On 2/15/2016 2:46 PM, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> Am 15.02.2016 um 16:24 schrieb Kurt Jaeger:
>>> it is not blocking in a hard way.
>>> But if you have it installed you deinstall it and reinstall it again,
>>> you maybe get permission problems, because the UID/GID for the gogs user
>>> can change.
>>
Am 15.02.2016 um 16:24 schrieb Kurt Jaeger:
>> it is not blocking in a hard way.
>> But if you have it installed you deinstall it and reinstall it again,
>> you maybe get permission problems, because the UID/GID for the gogs user
>> can change.
>
> That's a valid point.
>
> Is there a reason for
Hi!
> Am 15.02.2016 um 10:49 schrieb Kurt Jaeger:
> > The blocker for gogs is not the additional users, the blockers are
> > the GH_TUPLE and the Uses/go.mk changes:
> >
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204772
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205282
>
>
Am 15.02.2016 um 10:49 schrieb Kurt Jaeger:
> The blocker for gogs is not the additional users, the blockers are
> the GH_TUPLE and the Uses/go.mk changes:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204772
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205282
it is not blocking in
Hi!
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205283
[...]
> I created for this now:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207206
The blocker for gogs is not the additional users, the blockers are
the GH_TUPLE and the Uses/go.mk changes:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzill
Dear all,
Am 13.02.2016 um 11:40 schrieb Matthias Fechner:
> Yuri us are currently working on a new port for gogs:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205283
>
> For this a new user and group is required.
> I already checked the file and I would like to add the following files:
>
Dear all,
Yuri us are currently working on a new port for gogs:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205283
For this a new user and group is required.
I already checked the file and I would like to add the following files:
gogs:*:209:209::0:0:gogs user:/var/db/gogs/home:/bin/sh
and
13 matches
Mail list logo
