Am 28.03.2010, 22:16 Uhr, schrieb Hiroki Sato:
Peter Olsson wrote
in <1269804756.2864.94.ca...@x61s>:
po> I added no options to the configs that were displayed, just removed
some
po> (e.g. X11 from ghostscript IIRC). I'm not so concerned with the time
po> that passed, I'm just shocked by
Peter Olsson wrote
in <1269804756.2864.94.ca...@x61s>:
po> I added no options to the configs that were displayed, just removed some
po> (e.g. X11 from ghostscript IIRC). I'm not so concerned with the time
po> that passed, I'm just shocked by the number of ports that got installed.
po>
po> I'm g
Hello!
I did a test install of 8.0-RELEASE, and during installation I let the
recommended English docs remain chosen. After installation I installed
portmaster, cvsuped and ran portmaster -bda.
Five hours later (test PC is PIII 450) I'm in shock by the end result:
Installation of devel/li
Peter Thoenen wrote:
A) Making a delete port pr request. This way port maintainers INSTEAD
of marking 'transfer ownership to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' and hoping
somebody takes it over one day could actually just delete ports they no
longer wish to maintain. There should be some sort of WARN marking
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:53:32PM -0700, Peter Thoenen wrote:
> A couple months ago somebody posted a heads up on this list from the
> FreeBSD Ports Team about ports bloat and the massive influx of new
> software along with all the unmaintained ports. Has the port team ever
> thought about:
>
>
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:53:32PM -0700, Peter Thoenen wrote:
>
> A) Making a delete port pr request. This way port maintainers INSTEAD
> of marking 'transfer ownership to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' and hoping
> somebody takes it over one day could actually just delete ports they no
> longer wish to mai
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:53:32 -0500, Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A couple months ago somebody posted a heads up on this list from the
FreeBSD Ports Team about ports bloat and the massive influx of new
software along with all the unmaintained ports. Has the port team ever
thought abo
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:53:32PM -0700, Peter Thoenen wrote:
> B) In line with A, has anybody thought about just marking ALL
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] as scheduled for deletion on X date.
It turns out that a few of them are key pieces of infrastructure. Perhaps
we can generate a list of "ports that w
Peter Thoenen wrote:
A couple months ago somebody posted a heads up on this list from the
FreeBSD Ports Team about ports bloat and the massive influx of new
software along with all the unmaintained ports. Has the port team ever
thought about:
A) Making a delete port pr request. This way port m
A couple months ago somebody posted a heads up on this list from the
FreeBSD Ports Team about ports bloat and the massive influx of new
software along with all the unmaintained ports. Has the port team ever
thought about:
A) Making a delete port pr request. This way port maintainers INSTEAD
of m
10 matches
Mail list logo
