Re: graphics/linux-dri on 4.11

2006-07-07 Thread Bill Milford
- Original Message - From: "Mark Linimon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Matt Sealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Mark Linimon'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Bill Milford'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: graphics/linux-dri on 4.11

2006-07-07 Thread Mark Linimon
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:49:51PM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote: > Yeah wouldn't a solution be to have bsdtar have a PORT_REPLACES_BASE kind > of thing? > > Or a use.tar like use.perl? Well, it would be, if we were going to continue to support base systems without bsdtar already in them :-) mcl

RE: graphics/linux-dri on 4.11

2006-07-07 Thread Matt Sealey
riday, July 07, 2006 1:43 PM > To: Matt Sealey > Cc: 'Mark Linimon'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Bill Milford' > Subject: Re: graphics/linux-dri on 4.11 > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:33:55PM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote: > > Well this is a kind of internal-to-ports

Re: graphics/linux-dri on 4.11

2006-07-07 Thread Mark Linimon
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:33:55PM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote: > Well this is a kind of internal-to-ports thing that needs a > small change, not really a "fix linux-dri" thing. It could happen > with plenty of packages, so who deals with that? There is no individual who's on the hook for that, exact

RE: graphics/linux-dri on 4.11

2006-07-07 Thread Matt Sealey
> The policy is that we no longer require committers to make > sure things work on 4.X before they commit. To the extent > that people send patches, things will keep running. Well this is a kind of internal-to-ports thing that needs a small change, not really a "fix linux-dri" thing. It could

Re: graphics/linux-dri on 4.11

2006-07-07 Thread Mark Linimon
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 12:18:15PM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote: > I guess this has been completely looked over since BSD tar got very > clever about it. The worry is.. isn't 4.x totally obsolete, unsupported > now, and therefore not worth coding that fix for? :D The policy is that we no longer requir

RE: graphics/linux-dri on 4.11

2006-07-07 Thread Matt Sealey
> On 6.1, the bsdtar will figure out that a file is .gz or .bz2 > and still extract, however, the GNU tar does not. Conclusion, GNU tar sucks :) > It seems that this port has distfile in two different formats > and the the port structure cannot handle it. Definitely. USE_BZIP2 (see docs in M

Re: graphics/linux-dri on 4.11

2006-07-07 Thread Bill Milford
- Original Message - From: "Matt Sealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Bill Milford'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 9:48 AM Subject: RE: graphics/linux-dri on 4.11 Odd! The tar in FreeBSD 4.9 (tar

RE: graphics/linux-dri on 4.11

2006-07-07 Thread Matt Sealey
Odd! The tar in FreeBSD 4.9 (tar (GNU tar) 1.13.25) supports .bz2 files. Archive format selection: -V, --label=NAME create archive with volume name NAME PATTERNat list/extract time, a globbing PATTERN -o, --old-archive, --portability write a V