Re: UPDATING 20110730

On 2011-Aug-01 19:21:21 +0200, Michel Talon wrote: >This is unfortunately impossible because the ports system is organized >around a make logic and the relevant dependency variables are only >obtained through running make on each ports Makefile *in the context* of >the gigantic makefiles (bsd.port

Re: UPDATING 20110730

On 08/02/2011 13:39, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Just a few small corrections: I was using your description of the situation. Sorry if I misunderstood. -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of k

Re: UPDATING 20110730

on 02/08/2011 23:08 Doug Barton said the following: > On 08/02/2011 12:12, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 02/08/2011 21:26 Doug Barton said the following: >>> On 08/02/2011 06:14, Andriy Gapon wrote: Second, I think that portmaster could cache the origin => pkg mapping that it builds whi

Any progress on updating boost?

I notice that http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/156253 exists for the 1.46.1 update, however 1.47 is out since July 11. I'm curious about whatever plans may exist to do the update ... Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.

Re: UPDATING 20110730

On 08/02/2011 12:12, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 02/08/2011 21:26 Doug Barton said the following: >> On 08/02/2011 06:14, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> Second, I think that portmaster could cache the origin => pkg mapping that >>> it >>> builds while working on port A, so that it can be readily re-used for

Re: UPDATING 20110730

on 02/08/2011 21:26 Doug Barton said the following: > On 08/02/2011 06:14, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Second, I think that portmaster could cache the origin => pkg mapping that it >> builds while working on port A, so that it can be readily re-used for port B. >> That could also include "negative" mapp

Re: UPDATING 20110730

On 08/02/2011 06:14, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Second, I think that portmaster could cache the origin => pkg mapping that it > builds while working on port A, so that it can be readily re-used for port B. > That could also include "negative" mapping where there is no installed pkg > for a > given orig

portmaster, zfs metadata caching [Was: UPDATING 20110730]

on 02/08/2011 16:14 Andriy Gapon said the following: > And now to my side of the problem. > While "profiling" pkg_info with ktrace I see getdirentries(2) calls sometimes > take quite a while. And since I have > 1000 ports all those calls do add up. > DTrace shows that the calls are quite fast (~0.

Re: UPDATING 20110730

on 31/07/2011 22:14 Doug Barton said the following: > Understood, but I'm not sure what I can do about it unless I can > reproduce it. I reproduced the problem by doing a similar kind of upgrade: $ pkg_delete -f gtk-2.\* $ portmaster -v atk-2.0.1 gio-fam-backend-2.28.8 glib-2.28.8 gobject-introspe

Re: UPDATING 20110730

On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 09:39:05AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: > On Aug 1, 2011 7:10 AM, "Michel Talon" wrote: > [snip] > > This being said if an upgrade tool needs to compute (partially) the INDEX, > > most of the time is spent in running make -V in each port, > > because make has to read and int

Re: UPDATING 20110730

s in a week time, > I build a database (postgres) that contains all the ports installed, > de depencies and a flag that tells me if that port needs updating > (pkg_version) > a shell script scans the ports (pkg_info | cut -d ' ' -f 1) and builds > the database once a week (can

Re: UPDATING 20110730

On Aug 1, 2011 7:10 AM, "Michel Talon" wrote: [snip] > This being said if an upgrade tool needs to compute (partially) the INDEX, > most of the time is spent in running make -V in each port, > because make has to read and interpret enormous files. I don't see any way to > cut on that, or one sh

Re: UPDATING 20110730

that tells me if that port needs updating (pkg_version) a shell script scans the ports (pkg_info | cut -d ' ' -f 1) and builds the database once a week (can take several hours... Once the database is built, an sql query (only ms...) tells me what to do... it then executes pkg_delete, cd

Re: UPDATING 20110730

Le Monday 01 August 2011, Doug wrote: > > A lot of people say that, but I'll stack it up against just about any > interpreted language. Some of my routines are actually faster than the > equivalents in pkg_info (which is why I use them). > Yes, i have seen that portmaster is quite fast. I was me

Re: UPDATING 20110730

he origins in +CONTENTS > http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/check_pkg.py > proceeding globally as you describe above. It would not make a big > difference to completely fix the +CONTENTS. FYI, what portmaster is doing is fixing the pkgdep lines in +CONTENTS, and updating +REQUIRED_BY as nee

Re: UPDATING 20110730

Doug wrote: > Unfortunately the only way to improve on this would be to not do the > checks on a port-by-port basis, and do them all together at the end. > While that sounds appealing, it would dramatically increase the code > complexity, and also dramatically increase the chances of leaving the >

Re: UPDATING 20110730

On 08/01/2011 05:09, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> If for X ports all the relevant data under /var/db/pkg fits into >> fs cache, then the performance may be blazing, but once you exceed >> the cache size the performance might become totally different. > > and/or the poo

Re: UPDATING 20110730

Andriy Gapon wrote: > If for X ports all the relevant data under /var/db/pkg fits into > fs cache, then the performance may be blazing, but once you exceed > the cache size the performance might become totally different. and/or the poorly-performing system may have enough less memory than the ot

Re: UPDATING 20110730

on 31/07/2011 22:14 Doug Barton said the following: > On 07/31/2011 04:19, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 31/07/2011 04:32 Doug Barton said the following: > >>> I am not sure what you mean by "inside portmaster" is quite accurate. I >>> followed the instructions and everything worked according to plan.

Re: UPDATING 20110730

On 07/31/2011 04:19, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 31/07/2011 04:32 Doug Barton said the following: >> I am not sure what you mean by "inside portmaster" is quite accurate. I >> followed the instructions and everything worked according to plan. The >> vast majority of the wall clock time spent followin

Re: UPDATING 20110730

on 31/07/2011 04:32 Doug Barton said the following: > On 07/30/2011 12:38, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> 20110730: >>> AFFECTS: users of x11-toolkits/gtk20 >>> AUTHOR: gn...@freebsd.org >>> >>> The gtk-update-icon-cache utility has been slipt out of the gtk20 port. >> >> A minor typo in the above l

Re: UPDATING 20110730

On 07/30/2011 12:38, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> 20110730: >> AFFECTS: users of x11-toolkits/gtk20 >> AUTHOR: gn...@freebsd.org >> >> The gtk-update-icon-cache utility has been slipt out of the gtk20 port. > > A minor typo in the above line - slipt -> split. > >> Use the following instructions

UPDATING 20110730

-check-depends ===>>> devel/gobject-introspection is listed as a dependency ===>>> but there is no installed version ===>>> Try portmaster --check-depends This carpet of output starts with: ===>>> Updating dependency entry for gio-fam-backend-2.28.8

audio/umurmur needs updating

This port was added but has not been updated. When I created the following PR ( http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/**query-pr.cgi?pr=157100 ) ... this port wasn't in the repository yet. Please commit the newer version of this port found at the link prov

Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.gecko.mk ports/mail/thunderbird Makefile distinfo ports/mail/thunderbird/files liboggplay_oss patch-configure.in patch-directory-sdks-c-sdk-ldap-libraries-l

On 07/02/11 10:19, Florian Smeets wrote: On 01.07.11 07:45, Thomas Gellekum wrote: On 06/30/11 20:19, Florian Smeets wrote: [...] Log: update thunderbird to 5.0 Are you guys also planning to update deskutils/lightning-thunderbird to 1.0b4? The old port no longer works with Thunderbird 5. Y

Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.gecko.mk ports/mail/thunderbird Makefile distinfo ports/mail/thunderbird/files liboggplay_oss patch-configure.in patch-directory-sdks-c-sdk-ldap-libraries-l

On 01.07.11 07:45, Thomas Gellekum wrote: On 06/30/11 20:19, Florian Smeets wrote: [...] Log: update thunderbird to 5.0 Are you guys also planning to update deskutils/lightning-thunderbird to 1.0b4? The old port no longer works with Thunderbird 5. Yes, but there is no source.tar.gz yet. Onl

Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING

Matthias Andree wrote: Am 01.07.2011 05:22, schrieb Doug Barton: On 06/30/2011 14:03, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: stephen 2011-06-30 21:03:43 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: .UPDATING Log: - Tell octave-forge* users to completely

Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING

On 01/07/2011 05:22, Doug Barton wrote: > On 06/30/2011 14:03, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >> stephen 2011-06-30 21:03:43 UTC >> >>FreeBSD ports repository >> >>Modified files: >> .UPDATING >>Log: >>

Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING

Am 01.07.2011 05:22, schrieb Doug Barton: > On 06/30/2011 14:03, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >> stephen 2011-06-30 21:03:43 UTC >> >>FreeBSD ports repository >> >>Modified files: >> .UPDATING >>Log: >>

Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.gecko.mk ports/mail/thunderbird Makefile distinfo ports/mail/thunderbird/files liboggplay_oss patch-configure.in patch-directory-sdks-c-sdk-ldap-libraries-l

On 06/30/11 20:19, Florian Smeets wrote: [...] Log: update thunderbird to 5.0 Are you guys also planning to update deskutils/lightning-thunderbird to 1.0b4? The old port no longer works with Thunderbird 5. tg ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mai

Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING

On 06/30/2011 11:18 PM, Glen Barber wrote: I think it would be nice to have a "I_KNOW_I_HAVE_THIS_PORT_INSTALLED_ALREADY_BUT_UPGRADE_IT_ANYWAY" flag for situations that seem to be what caused this reply, unless I misunderstand the cause of the UPDATING entry. In either case, see be

Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING

On 06/30/2011 20:57, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 06/30/2011 10:22 PM, Doug Barton wrote: On 06/30/2011 14:03, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: stephen 2011-06-30 21:03:43 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: . UPDATING Log: - Tell octave-forge* users to completely remove old

Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING

irst. > I think it would be nice to have a "I_KNOW_I_HAVE_THIS_PORT_INSTALLED_ALREADY_BUT_UPGRADE_IT_ANYWAY" flag for situations that seem to be what caused this reply, unless I misunderstand the cause of the UPDATING entry. In either case, see below. More specifically, I think it w

Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING

On 06/30/2011 10:22 PM, Doug Barton wrote: On 06/30/2011 14:03, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: stephen 2011-06-30 21:03:43 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: .UPDATING Log: - Tell octave-forge* users to completely remove old ports

Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING

On 06/30/2011 14:03, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: stephen 2011-06-30 21:03:43 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: .UPDATING Log: - Tell octave-forge* users to completely remove old ports before reinstalling. This is not the first time

Re: multimedia/ffmpeg: error updating to 0.7.1,1

> > It seems the problem is still there: > tingo@kg-v2$ uname -a > FreeBSD kg-v2.kg4.no 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #3: Thu Sep 16 > 22:18:48 CEST 2010 r...@kg-v2.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > amd64 > Last part of build output: > CClibavcodec/vp5.o > CClibavcodec/vp56.o > {st

Re: multimedia/ffmpeg: error updating to 0.7.1,1

Hi, On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Robert Huff wrote: > >        There was a problem with the latest update - maintainer missed > a patch file. >        It has been corrected; please update and try again.  If failure > persists, please talk to the maintainer. It seems the problem is still the

Re: multimedia/ffmpeg: error updating to 0.7.1,1

There was a problem with the latest update - maintainer missed a patch file. It has been corrected; please update and try again. If failure persists, please talk to the maintainer. Respectfully, Robert Huff __

Re: multimedia/ffmpeg: error updating to 0.7.1,1

On 6/26/2011 12:27 PM, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: Confirmed, as long as I use the default system compiler (gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]). When using gcc 4.5 (set USE_GCC=4.5+) from ports, I can build ffmpeg just fine on amd64 8.2-RELEASE, even with SSE3 etc. enabled. I'm getting th

Re: multimedia/ffmpeg: error updating to 0.7.1,1

## Torfinn Ingolfsen (tin...@gmail.com): > Hi, > More errors. > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Barbara wrote: > > > > I'm getting the following error (http://pastebin.com/fjggW0C4) trying to > > upgrade ffmpeg: > > On a 64-bit machine and os: > tingo@kg-v2$ uname -a > FreeBSD kg-v2.kg4.no 8.

Re: multimedia/ffmpeg: error updating to 0.7.1,1

On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Hi, > More errors. > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Barbara wrote: >> >> I'm getting the following error (http://pastebin.com/fjggW0C4) trying to >> upgrade ffmpeg: > > On a 64-bit machine and os: And I get the same error on a machi

Re: multimedia/ffmpeg: error updating to 0.7.1,1

peg-0.6.3_1,1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=0.6.3_1,1 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! multimedia/ffmpeg (ffmpeg-0.6.3_1,1) (new compiler error) root@kg-v2# pv | grep ffmpeg ffmpeg-0.6.3_1,1< needs updating (port has 0.7.1,1) --

multimedia/ffmpeg: error updating to 0.7.1,1

I'm getting the following error (http://pastebin.com/fjggW0C4) trying to upgrade ffmpeg: In file included from ffplay.c:34: libavformat/avformat.h:151: warning: 'AVMetadata' is deprecated ffplay.c: In function 'input_request_frame': ffplay.c:1627: warning: passing argument 3 of 'av_image_copy

Updating "Moonlight" port

Is it possible to update the Moonlight port? There appears to be a newer version available, Moonlight 4. -- Carmel ✌ carmel...@hotmail.com Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. __

Re: "UPDATING" file

On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 07:41:56 -0400, Jerry wrote: > 20110620: > AFFECTS: users of net/samba35 > AUTHOR: ti...@freebsd.org > > A bug, introduced by local patch to pam_winbind.so, that made it coredump > was spotted by Martin Minkus. It is fixed in the 3.5.9 version of the port. > So, if

Re: "UPDATING" file

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Jerry wrote: > > 20110620: > AFFECTS: users of net/samba35 > AUTHOR: ti...@freebsd.org > > A bug, introduced by local patch to pam_winbind.so, that made it coredump > was spotted by Martin Minkus. It is fixed in the 3.5.9 version of the > port. > So, if pam_

"UPDATING" file

20110620: AFFECTS: users of net/samba35 AUTHOR: ti...@freebsd.org A bug, introduced by local patch to pam_winbind.so, that made it coredump was spotted by Martin Minkus. It is fixed in the 3.5.9 version of the port. So, if pam_winbind.so strated to work for you - send him kudos. Inter

Re: Next commit... please correct UPDATING

On 06/07/2011 12:08, Jason Hellenthal wrote: ports, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:06:28PM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote: Ports, etc... Would whomever checks in the next commit please fix the following entries in UPDATING 20110503 20110427 This was also supposed to say... by adding a

Re: Next commit... please correct UPDATING

ports, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:06:28PM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > Ports, etc... > > Would whomever checks in the next commit please fix the following > entries in UPDATING > > 20110503 > 20110427 > > This was also supposed to say... by add

Re: portmaster - updating devel/gconf2 triggers install of net/openldap24-sasl-client, even though it's installed and up to date

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> > Did you set any OPTIONS on openldap when you first installed it? >> >> I bet the SASL option is set and net/openldap24-client (origin) is >> installed. > > yes and yes > >> We should just kill the openldap2{3,4}-sasl-{client,server} >>

Re: portmaster - updating devel/gconf2 triggers install of net/openldap24-sasl-client, even though it's installed and up to date

On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 04:15:29PM +0400, Yuri Pankov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:07:29PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 6 Jun 2011 12:41, "Anton Shterenlikht" wrote: > > > > > > > > > # pkg_version -vXs openlda > > > openldap-sasl-client-2.4.25_2 = up-to-date with port > > > > >

Re: portmaster - updating devel/gconf2 triggers install of net/openldap24-sasl-client, even though it's installed and up to date

On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:07:29PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > On 6 Jun 2011 12:41, "Anton Shterenlikht" wrote: > > > > > > # pkg_version -vXs openlda > > openldap-sasl-client-2.4.25_2 = up-to-date with port > > > > # portmaster gconf > > > > ===>>> Currently installed version: gconf2-2.32.

Re: portmaster - updating devel/gconf2 triggers install of net/openldap24-sasl-client, even though it's installed and up to date

On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:07:29PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > On 6 Jun 2011 12:41, "Anton Shterenlikht" wrote: > > > > > > # pkg_version -vXs openlda > > openldap-sasl-client-2.4.25_2 = up-to-date with port > > > > # portmaster gconf > > > > ===>>> Currently installed version: gconf2-2.32.

Re: portmaster - updating devel/gconf2 triggers install of net/openldap24-sasl-client, even though it's installed and up to date

On 6 Jun 2011 12:41, "Anton Shterenlikht" wrote: > > > # pkg_version -vXs openlda > openldap-sasl-client-2.4.25_2 = up-to-date with port > > # portmaster gconf > > ===>>> Currently installed version: gconf2-2.32.0_2 > ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/gconf2 > > ===>>> Gathering dist

portmaster - updating devel/gconf2 triggers install of net/openldap24-sasl-client, even though it's installed and up to date

# pkg_version -vXs openlda openldap-sasl-client-2.4.25_2 = up-to-date with port # portmaster gconf ===>>> Currently installed version: gconf2-2.32.0_2 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/gconf2 ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports ===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

Dear All, I have just submitted an update to net/p5-IO-Socket-INET6. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=157427 Sorry for the long delay. Janos Mohacsi Head of HBONE+ project Network Engineer, Deputy Director of Network Planning and Projects NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY Key 70EF9882: D

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

On Mon, 23 May 2011 21:07:27 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen articulated: > Yes, all went flawlessly. Spamd now starts without the error. Thanks > for the help! I'll send the PR too. Don't thank me, thank Hajimu UMEMOTO , he was the one who figured it out. Hopefully the maintainer of the "net/p5-I

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

On Mon, 23 May 2011, the wise Jerry wrote: OK, I just used the patch and updated the port and all is well. To patch the port Makefile, cd to /usr/ports/net/p5-IO-Socket-INET6 and then place the patch into that directory. You can name the patch anything you like; ie, New_Make for example. Then a

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

On Mon, 23 May 2011 19:09:51 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen articulated: > On Mon, 23 May 2011, the wise Jerry wrote: > > >> In my case spamd sometimes terminates, and sometimes not. I don't > >> know when or why unfortunately. > > > > Did you try the patch from Hajimu UMEMOTO in a > > previous

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

On Mon, 23 May 2011, the wise Jerry wrote: In my case spamd sometimes terminates, and sometimes not. I don't know when or why unfortunately. Did you try the patch from Hajimu UMEMOTO in a previous post? I cannot do it until this evening. I am wondering if it might correct your problem also. I

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

On Mon, 23 May 2011 17:52:41 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen articulated: > In my case spamd sometimes terminates, and sometimes not. I don't > know when or why unfortunately. Did you try the patch from Hajimu UMEMOTO in a previous post? I cannot do it until this evening. I am wondering if it mig

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

On Mon, 23 May 2011, the wise Jerry wrote: I have confirmed that the program does run even though it emits that warning. I have noticed that users of "spamd" and perhaps others are experiencing the same phenomena. I am not sure if it causes "spamd" to terminate or not. In my case spamd someti

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

On Mon, 23 May 2011 22:09:30 +0900 Hajimu UMEMOTO articulated: > Hi, > > # I've CC'ed the maintainer of p5-IO-Socket-INET6. > > > On Sat, 21 May 2011 08:36:45 -0400 > > Jerry said: > > jerry> The port: "/net/sendemail" builds fine after the update to > jerry> Perl; however, it no long

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

Hi, # I've CC'ed the maintainer of p5-IO-Socket-INET6. > On Sat, 21 May 2011 08:36:45 -0400 > Jerry said: jerry> The port: "/net/sendemail" builds fine after the update to Perl; jerry> however, it no longer runs. It terminates with this error message: jerry> Subroutine IO::Socket::INET

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

is not mandatory > so bumping this ports will be pointless to all users (and they are > most of users) who decide to stay with old perl - they just end up > with unneeded superfluous rebuilds. And those who want to be on the > edge with perl should follow UPDATING entry (rebuild all t

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

On Sun, 22 May 2011 19:00:52 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen articulated: {SNIP} > I'm getting this same error message with spamd: > ... > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd restart > Stopping spamd. > Waiting for PIDS: 44108. > Starting spamd. > Subroutine IO::Socket::INET6::sockaddr_in6 redefined at

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

On 22/05/2011 12:13, Jerry wrote: [snip] Been there, done that; however, the problem still exists. If you had read my original post you would have been aware of that. Yes, you are quite right - I apologise for only having scanned your OP. Regards, Jase. _

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

nd up with unneeded superfluous rebuilds. And those who want to be on the edge with perl should follow UPDATING entry (rebuild all that depends on perl) or resolve such issues manually. But they surely should be bumped when ports tree will be switched to 5.14 as a main perl version. -- Regar

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/IO/Socket/INET6.pm line 21 This is a FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE amd64 machine. I followed the directions in the UPDATING file when upgrading Perl and then even did a reboot to insure everything would start up correctly. The only errors I received when updating

Re: net/sendemail fails with perl 5.14 (INET6) (was: Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl)

Hi, > On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:51:35 +0300 > Ion-Mihai Tetcu said: > jerry> The port: "/net/sendemail" builds fine after the update to > jerry> Perl; however, it no longer runs. It terminates with this > jerry> error message: > > jerry> Subroutine IO::Socket::INET6::sockaddr_in6 redefined

net/sendemail fails with perl 5.14 (INET6) (was: Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl)

On Sun, 22 May 2011 21:21:44 +0900 Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > > > On Sat, 21 May 2011 08:36:45 -0400 > > Jerry said: > > jerry> The port: "/net/sendemail" builds fine after the update to > jerry> Perl; however, it no longer runs. It terminates with this > jerry> error message: > >

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

Hi, > On Sat, 21 May 2011 08:36:45 -0400 > Jerry said: jerry> The port: "/net/sendemail" builds fine after the update to Perl; jerry> however, it no longer runs. It terminates with this error message: jerry> Subroutine IO::Socket::INET6::sockaddr_in6 redefined at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

t of the woodwork. In > > any case, it is a problem that needs solving. > > Isn't the recommended practice to reinstall all perl related ports > after upgrading perl to a new minor version? > > Taken from /usr/ports/UPDATING : [snip] Been there, done that; however, the pr

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

that more will be crawling out of the woodwork. In any case, it is a problem that needs solving. Isn't the recommended practice to reinstall all perl related ports after upgrading perl to a new minor version? Taken from /usr/ports/UPDATING : 20110517: AFFECTS: users of lang/pe

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

On Sat, 21 May 2011 22:38:33 +0400 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov articulated: > 21.05.2011 22:30, Doug Barton пишет: > > > Check /usr/local/lib/perl5/ and /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl to > > see if you still have modules installed from the previous version > > of perl. If you do, use pkg_info -W to find

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

21.05.2011 22:30, Doug Barton пишет: Check /usr/local/lib/perl5/ and /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl to see if you still have modules installed from the previous version of perl. If you do, use pkg_info -W to find what module, and reinstall it. If you use portmaster, 'portmaster p5' is usually su

Re: "net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

On 05/21/2011 05:36, Jerry wrote: The port: "/net/sendemail" builds fine after the update to Perl; however, it no longer runs. It terminates with this error message: Subroutine IO::Socket::INET6::sockaddr_in6 redefined at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.0/Exporter.pm line 67. at /usr/local/lib/perl

Re: ERROR building webkit-gtk2 after updating to Perl

> > Switch.pm was deprecated for some time as a core perl module and > > finally removed from 5.14.0. You need to install devel/p5-Switch for > > building webkit-gtk2 (same goes for chromium). I'm just figuring out > > how how to have a conditional dependency, then I'll send a PR. > > I don't seem

Re: ERROR building webkit-gtk2 after updating to Perl

## Jerry (je...@seibercom.net): > > Switch.pm was deprecated for some time as a core perl module and > > finally removed from 5.14.0. You need to install devel/p5-Switch for > > building webkit-gtk2 (same goes for chromium). I'm just figuring out > > how how to have a conditional dependency, then

Re: ERROR building webkit-gtk2 after updating to Perl

On Sat, 21 May 2011 14:32:26 +0200 Christoph Moench-Tegeder articulated: > ## Jerry (je...@seibercom.net): > > > Can't locate Switch.pm in @INC (@INC > > contains: ./WebCore/bindings/scripts /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.0/BSDPAN > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/mach > > /usr/local/lib/pe

Re: ERROR building webkit-gtk2 after updating to Perl

On Sat, 21 May 2011, the wise Jerry wrote: After updating Perl, I am unable to build "www/webkit-gtk2". It terminates with the following error message: /usr/local/bin/perl "./WebCore/css/makeprop.pl" mv CSSPropertyNames.* ./DerivedSources /usr/local/bin/perl -ne '

"net/sendemail" fails after updating Perl

cket/INET6.pm line 21 This is a FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE amd64 machine. I followed the directions in the UPDATING file when upgrading Perl and then even did a reboot to insure everything would start up correctly. The only errors I received when updating Perl were regarding "graphics/graphviz"

Re: ERROR building webkit-gtk2 after updating to Perl

## Jerry (je...@seibercom.net): > Can't locate Switch.pm in @INC (@INC contains: ./WebCore/bindings/scripts > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.0/BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/mach > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.0/mach > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.0 .) a

ERROR building webkit-gtk2 after updating to Perl

After updating Perl, I am unable to build "www/webkit-gtk2". It terminates with the following error message: /usr/local/bin/perl "./WebCore/css/makeprop.pl" mv CSSPropertyNames.* ./DerivedSources /usr/local/bin/perl -ne 'print lc' ./WebCore/css/CSSV

Re: Error when updating sudo

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:57:45AM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:03:34AM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > > > I get the error below when updating/installing sudo > > > > everything in the file /usr/local/etc/sudoers near line 97 > >

Re: Error when updating sudo

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:03:34AM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > I get the error below when updating/installing sudo > > everything in the file /usr/local/etc/sudoers near line 97 > > is commented out! It's actually not commented out, as Charlie mentioned. I committ

Re: Error when updating sudo

On Sun 10 Apr 2011 at 23:03:34 PDT Leslie Jensen wrote: I get the error below when updating/installing sudo everything in the file /usr/local/etc/sudoers near line 97 is commented out! If the comment just before line 97 is to be believed, the line beginning with "#include" is NOT

Error when updating sudo

I get the error below when updating/installing sudo everything in the file /usr/local/etc/sudoers near line 97 is commented out! Thanks /Leslie -Wl,-soname -Wl,sample_group.so -Wl,-retain-symbols-file -Wl,./sample_group.sym -o .libs/sample_group.so libtool: link: ( cd ".libs"

Re: Updating multiple ports with portmaster

On 03/26/2011 09:47, Doug Barton wrote: On 3/26/2011 8:22 AM, Ron (Lists) wrote: Is there a way to get portmaster to behave like portupgrade did and only upgrade what needs to be upgraded? I reserve the right not only to change my mind, but also to be wrong on occasion. :) I just ran into

Re: Updating multiple ports with portmaster

On 03/27/2011 03:07, J. Hellenthal wrote: Hi Doug, ...Everyone else, Since were on the (-i) subject here. Do you have any plans in the near future to implement a way for to change the default questioning response from [y] to [n] ? No, sorry. I think it would be very confusing to the average

Re: Updating multiple ports with portmaster

On 03/27/2011 00:26, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Doug Barton wrote: On 03/26/2011 10:00, Matthew Seaman wrote: pkg_version -vIL= | awk '/^p5-/ { print $1 }' | xargs portmaster That's a good suggestion, but if you want to use that technique, better would be: portmaster `pkg_version -vIL= |

Re: Updating multiple ports with portmaster

On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 12:47, dougb@ wrote: On 3/26/2011 8:22 AM, Ron (Lists) wrote: I have a questions about the use of portmaster when upgrading multiple ports and how to correctly use wildcards. For example, I have this from pkg_version: p5-Digest-SHA-5.50 < needs updating (port has 5.61)

Re: Updating multiple ports with portmaster

Doug Barton wrote: > On 03/26/2011 10:00, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > pkg_version -vIL= | awk '/^p5-/ { print $1 }' | xargs portmaster > > That's a good suggestion, but if you want to use that technique, better > would be: portmaster `pkg_version -vIL= | awk '/^p5-/ { print $1 }'` ... Unless the

Re: Updating multiple ports with portmaster

On 03/26/2011 10:00, Matthew Seaman wrote: pkg_version -vIL= | awk '/^p5-/ { print $1 }' | xargs portmaster That's a good suggestion, but if you want to use that technique, better would be: portmaster `pkg_version -vIL= | awk '/^p5-/ { print $1 }'` so that you can take advantage of the inte

Re: Updating multiple ports with portmaster

; > other ports that need to be updated, you could use something like: > > > > pkg_version -qos p5- -l '<' | xargs portmaster > > > > Of course, since some new versions of p5-* ports may depend upon new > > versions of other, non p5-* ports, updating onl

Re: Updating multiple ports with portmaster

Am 26.03.2011 17:58, schrieb b. f.: I have a questions about the use of portmaster when upgrading multiple ports and how to correctly use wildcards. For example, I have this from pkg_version: p5-Digest-SHA-5.50<needs updating (port has 5.61) p5-IO-Socket-SSL-1.38<needs up

Re: Updating multiple ports with portmaster

On 26/03/2011 16:47, Doug Barton wrote: > On 3/26/2011 8:22 AM, Ron (Lists) wrote: >> I have a questions about the use of portmaster when upgrading multiple >> ports and how to correctly use wildcards. >> >> For example, I have this from pkg_version: >> >> p5

Re: Updating multiple ports with portmaster

> I have a questions about the use of portmaster when upgrading multiple > ports and how to correctly use wildcards. > > For example, I have this from pkg_version: > > p5-Digest-SHA-5.50 < needs updating (port has 5.61) > p5-IO-Socket-SSL-1.38

Re: Updating multiple ports with portmaster

On 3/26/2011 8:22 AM, Ron (Lists) wrote: I have a questions about the use of portmaster when upgrading multiple ports and how to correctly use wildcards. For example, I have this from pkg_version: p5-Digest-SHA-5.50 < needs updating (port has 5.61) p5-IO-Socket-SSL-1.38 < needs updating

Updating multiple ports with portmaster

I have a questions about the use of portmaster when upgrading multiple ports and how to correctly use wildcards. For example, I have this from pkg_version: p5-Digest-SHA-5.50 < needs updating (port has 5.61) p5-IO-Socket-SSL-1.38 < needs updating (po

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >