Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 01:19:26PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sep 8, 2011, at 7:35 AM, Miroslav Lachman<000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 00:04:14 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
No, you don't hit the limitatio
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 01:19:26PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2011, at 7:35 AM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>
> > Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> >> Sahil Tandon wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 00:04:14 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> >>>
> No, you don't hit the limitation
On Sep 8, 2011, at 7:35 AM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
> Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>> Sahil Tandon wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 00:04:14 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
>>>
No, you don't hit the limitation. It seems you really found a bug in
the Framework!
From the
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 00:04:14 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
No, you don't hit the limitation. It seems you really found a bug in
the Framework!
From the Framework code in bsd.port.mk existing groups should honored.
Along those lines, what about using
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 00:05:16 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> [ adding portmgr@ to the chain since we're in bpmk territory]
>
> On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 15:09:49 +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>
> > Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > >On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 00:04:14 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> > >
> > >>No, you d
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 00:04:14 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
No, you don't hit the limitation. It seems you really found a bug in
the Framework!
From the Framework code in bsd.port.mk existing groups should honored.
Along those lines, what about using groupmod instead of user
On Aug 1, 2011, at 9:01 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 00:04:14 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
>
>> No, you don't hit the limitation. It seems you really found a bug in
>> the Framework!
>>
>> From the Framework code in bsd.port.mk existing groups should honored.
>
> Along those lin
