That said, I think that un-deprecating these ports just because someone
can find a distfile somewhere is the wrong approach. bapt has been very
careful to only deprecate ports that are on the absolute bottom of the
pile. They are unmaintained, and unfetchable.
That's not completely accurate.
Am 15.03.2011 23:19, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin:
2011/3/15 Charlie Kestercorky1...@comcast.net
I see there's been another few batch commits deprecating some
unmaintained ports where upstream is gone and/or distfile is no longer
available.
Maintainers and prospective maintainers should be sure
2011/3/16 Matthias Andree mand...@freebsd.org
Baptiste,
I generally agree with your approach, and as Doug pointed out, it has
worked out fine. Those ports that people had interest in triggered, for
instance, Charlie's response.
However, we should be sure to find maintainers before ports
+ the period emails
from portsmon about deprecated ports.
The next one of those is scheduled in the next few days.
(Remember, too, that deleted ports can always be brought back from
the Attic, if there is sufficient cause.)
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 06:15:11AM +, b. f. wrote:
But it's not clear to me why, for example, some usable fonts were
deprecated -- fonts often don't have homepages.
The deprecations are (currently) advisory-only.
If people are using these ports, and want to keep them, then they need
to
--On March 16, 2011 6:15:11 AM + b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
That said, I think that un-deprecating these ports just because someone
can find a distfile somewhere is the wrong approach. bapt has been very
careful to only deprecate ports that are on the absolute bottom of the
pile.
On Wed 16 Mar 2011 at 03:45:25 PDT Matthias Andree wrote:
However, we should be sure to find maintainers before ports are
undeprecated, else we run into a cycle of deprecation, reviving the
port, deprecating it again, and so on.
I definitely agree with this. If someone wants to get one of
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
I also saw that graphics/gimp-greycstoration is finally deprecated.
Baptiste you may want to look at ports/154596 to close it.
In fact this is an interesting plugin which is superseded by
gmic from the same author David Tschumperlé
I see there's been another few batch commits deprecating some
unmaintained ports where upstream is gone and/or distfile is no longer
available.
Maintainers and prospective maintainers should be sure to look at the
ports listed in these commits. I don't think much effort was made to
check the
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 02:58:01PM -0700, Charlie Kester thus spake:
I see there's been another few batch commits deprecating some
unmaintained ports where upstream is gone and/or distfile is no longer
available.
Maintainers and prospective maintainers should be sure to look at the
ports listed
On Tue 15 Mar 2011 at 14:59:57 PDT Jason Helfman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 02:58:01PM -0700, Charlie Kester thus spake:
I see there's been another few batch commits deprecating some
unmaintained ports where upstream is gone and/or distfile is no longer
available.
Maintainers and
2011/3/15 Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net
I see there's been another few batch commits deprecating some
unmaintained ports where upstream is gone and/or distfile is no longer
available.
Maintainers and prospective maintainers should be sure to look at the
ports listed in these commits.
2011/3/15 Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net
On Tue 15 Mar 2011 at 14:59:57 PDT Jason Helfman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 02:58:01PM -0700, Charlie Kester thus spake:
I see there's been another few batch commits deprecating some
unmaintained ports where upstream is gone and/or distfile
On Tue 15 Mar 2011 at 15:19:29 PDT Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I am responsible for the deprecation and I have done more than just
look if the distfiles fetch (I fixed lot of them) I may have missed
some for sure, when when I deprecate sysutils/lookat I wasn't able to
join the main website nor
2011/3/15 Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net
On Tue 15 Mar 2011 at 15:19:29 PDT Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I am responsible for the deprecation and I have done more than just
look if the distfiles fetch (I fixed lot of them) I may have missed
some for sure, when when I deprecate
On 03/15/2011 15:16, Charlie Kester wrote:
BTW, I don't use either of these, or gimpshop, so I'm not going to fix
the ports myself. Instead, I'll leave that to anyone who's interested.
Charlie,
I think you've been very diplomatic in your approach, so to be clear I
don't have a problem with
16.03.2011 01:27, Charlie Kester пишет:
Maybe it wasn't there when you looked, but
http://www.gimpshop.com/download.shtml has links to download sources for
both the development version and the latest release (2.2.8). They even
have an alternate link for the release version.
gimpshop is pretty
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 07:40 +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
gimpshop is pretty old and development seems stalled. The next gimp release
will
have gimpshop-like UI by default so i think it worth deprecating.
That's almost too optimistic thing to say at the moment, as GIMP's
single window
18 matches
Mail list logo
